I’ve had quite a few discussions with people concerning some aspect of being both a real estate agent and a real estate photographer. I find when a subject like this pops up out of the blue from a bunch of different people I usually indicate a trend going on. There were four different questions that people posed on this subject:
- Is there a benefit to being both an agent and a real estate photographer that shoots for other agents besides your own listings?
- Is there some conflict of interest if you are both a listing agent and a real estate photographers?
- Are there many agents that do real estate photography for other agents?
- What are the problems with being both an agent and a photographer?
Is there a benefit to be an agent-real estate photographer?
Yes, the benefits are substantial. As an agent you can legally go in a home that has a lock-box on it without the listing agent. This is a huge convenience for the listing agent. You don’t have to call, but instead they just call you and say go photograph my listing over on Main St, it has a lock box on it. They don’t have to go meet the photographer there. It’s worth noting that this is not an issue every place in the world. Some areas of the world photographers can just go contact the home owner and do the shoot.
Also, as an agent you have an inside perspective to the real estate business. You see how it works. Understand who the major players in your area are and gives you a lot of contacts in the business. It just gives you an inside track to be up to your armpits in the business.
Is there a conflict of interest?
No, I don’t see any conflict. Does anyone else see a conflict? I’m frankly puzzled why anyone would even think there might be a conflict.
Read more