PFRE is the original online resource for real estate and interior photographers. Since 2006, it has been a community hub where like-minded professionals from around the world gather to share information with a common goal of improving their work and advancing their business. With thousands of articles, covering hundreds of topics, PFRE offers the most robust collection of educational material in our field. The history of real estate photography has been documented within these pages.
All Articles


Have you ever walked into a room because you had to go get something and by the time you got there, you forgot what you were supposed to get? I don't know about you but this happens to me all the time! It's happened so frequently lately that I started ...



The PFRE Community Forum is an online resource for discussing the art and business of Real Estate and Interior Photography.
Join The Discussion


View Now


For over a decade, photographers from around the world have participated in PFRE’s monthly photography contests, culminating in the year-end crowning of PFRE’s Photographer of the Year. With a new theme each month and commentary offered by some of the finest real estate & interior photographers anywhere, these contests offer a fun, competitive environment with rich learning opportunities. 

Contest Rules


View / Submit


View Archive


PFRE’s Annual Conference in Las Vegas provides real estate and interior photographers from around the world an opportunity to meet on an annual basis, to learn, share best practices and make connections. Many of the leading names in our field are selected to speak on topics aimed at improving our craft and advancing our business. It’s a comfortable, relaxed environment that is fun, easy to get to, and affordable.


PFRE Conference 2020

Register Now

Latest News

Limited Early Bird Spots on Sale Now! PFRE Virtual Conference 2020

The roster of presenters is full, and the PFRE Virtual Conference is o ...

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 2 of 2

*Early bird tickets go on sale September 28th* Here are the remaining ...

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 1 of 2

We're a few short months away from the PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 an ...

Reader Poll: Which Topics Should Be Covered at the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference?

Planning is well underway for the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference and we' ...



The PFRE podcast is focused on having meaningful conversations with world-class photographers, business professionals and industry leaders, with the goal to inform and inspire.
All Podcasts

Coming Soon...



PFRE prides itself on the depth and breadth of the information and professional development resources it makes available to our community. Our goal is to help real estate and interior photographers be successful while bringing the community together and elevating the industry as a whole.


Coming Soon...

Shoot Low to Give a More Spacious Feeling

Published: 04/04/2007
By: larry
Click photo to see examples

I want to highlight an important tip raised recently in comments by Cherie Irwin and Scott Hargis. Last week Cherie sent me some examples of the same image shot from different heights above the floor (see Cherie's examples above). Cherie pointed out that she'd been viewing some interior images shot by a tall person standing up straight and that she thought her images (shot lower because she was short) worked better.

About the same time Cherie and I were discussing this issue Scott Hargis commented that:

"Almost every room will benefit from shooting from a kneeling or squatting position - putting the camera about 30? to 45? off the floor. This emphasizes the floor more than the ceiling (making the room appear more spacious), and in my opinion, more readily mimics the human eye’s perception of the room."

I think Cherie and Scott have raised an important observation. Too much ceiling can be distracting and having more floor in an interior image does give a feeling of spaciousness. Of course, in kitchens counter tops force you to have the camera at least counter-top level (usually bout 37") so the images shows the top of the counter.

Thanks Cherie and Scott for pointing this out. Many times I've found myself shooting low but I've never given much thought to why it worked better than standing up straight.

9 comments on “Shoot Low to Give a More Spacious Feeling”

  1. My belief is that the best vertical position is in the middle of the ceiling-floor distance, this give no more emphasis on one or the other. Further: the spacious feeling is caused by the distance with the structure; ceilings, floors, walls, furniture. To emphasize space, you have to compose your shot with this in mind.

  2. I take the contents of the room into account as well. You can see how the couch against the wall is more blocked in the lower photo. The middle one or even the higher one would be my choice in this case. Hardwood floors are always important to emphasize.

  3. IMHO...Ceiling space should not be the determining factor in how high you position the camera. Like Mark said, the contents of the room are more important. I crop out the ceilings after the fact. And though my photos are rarely the 4:3 MLS ratio, I am willing to sacrifice some image quality, via MLS compression, for better composition.

    That said, I've noticed that I usually shoot from about 40" or so.

  4. Composition is important, and that is why I chose this room to use for my experiment. You see, those are my little dogs in my little family room. I've always had issues with this's a long & narrow room, at 24' x 12', and is difficult to photograph due to the furniture arrangement & floorplan.

    After examining photos taken by one of my competitors...from his "tall" point of view. I started questioning what was "wrong" with his photos. It seemed strange to me that I was looking down into the room. I'm not very tall, so I never see furniture from such a high perspective. That brings me to the room used for my experiment. When I walk into this room, I see exactly what you see in Example 2 (at 60"). But, I thought that Example 1 (shot at 48") was the best of the three because it showed the room in perfect balance, and it didn't give the feeling that one was looking down into the room. The comment was made, however, that the sofa against the wall was blocked in that particular photo. That begs the question, how important is it to highlight or show off the furniture, and will it skew the view/composition of the room to do so?

  5. I don't think you are comparing apples with apples in the three examples presented.

    The camera should have been titlted down in the 60" shot, and even more so in the 72" shot, so that the same relative proportions of floor and ceiling are shown.

    The lower 48" shot does have potential (and benefit?) of exagerating perspective, especially with foreground detail, but you need to be mindful of distant objects that may become obscured by the foreground objects.

  6. Cute dogs 🙂

    I tend to mostly shoot from about my lower chest level, camera leveled out.

    I guess if were me, I would have moved in a little and not gotten the stair well wall in the shot... but the lower shot does look better, IMO

  7. Personally, I like the composition of the 60" shot based on the rule of thirds, the placement of the picture frame to the right setting the vanishing point and the banister settling into the bottom left corner.
    But that's my novice opinion, I'm here to learn from the pros.

  8. I would have moved that chair and come forward from the banister but I suspect that Cherie would have done that if she were actually shooting for a client rather than as examples for us. (her work and website are beautiful) I agree about keeping the camera low. I shoot on a tripod at all times because I find it easier to keep the camera low enough without totally frying my knees (yes I am over 45)and also to keep it level. (For those of you who have read Larry's other posts about furniture moving pro/con...I carry a lot of business liability insurance so if the worst happens when I move a piece of furniture, I am covered.)

  9. Thank you...I also would have moved the dogs out of the shot, too...if I were getting paid for the shoot, rather than just firing off experimental shots.

    I shoot on a tripod too, as a girl who wears dresses often, I'd rather not have crusty callused knees. Ewww... Besides, shooting on a tripod, you rarely have to fix verticals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *