PFRE is the original online resource for real estate and interior photographers. Since 2006, it has been a community hub where like-minded professionals from around the world gather to share information with a common goal of improving their work and advancing their business. With thousands of articles, covering hundreds of topics, PFRE offers the most robust collection of educational material in our field. The history of real estate photography has been documented within these pages.
All Articles


The Render Flames tool in Photoshop is a very powerful and dynamic tool that lets you add fire in just a few steps where there otherwise wasn't one in your photo. In this video, I demonstrate step by step how you can have Photoshop render a fire into a ...



The PFRE Community Forum is an online resource for discussing the art and business of Real Estate and Interior Photography.
Join The Discussion


View Now


For over a decade, photographers from around the world have participated in PFRE’s monthly photography contests, culminating in the year-end crowning of PFRE’s Photographer of the Year. With a new theme each month and commentary offered by some of the finest real estate & interior photographers anywhere, these contests offer a fun, competitive environment with rich learning opportunities. 

Contest Rules


View / Submit


View Archive


PFRE’s Annual Conference in Las Vegas provides real estate and interior photographers from around the world an opportunity to meet on an annual basis, to learn, share best practices and make connections. Many of the leading names in our field are selected to speak on topics aimed at improving our craft and advancing our business. It’s a comfortable, relaxed environment that is fun, easy to get to, and affordable.


PFRE Conference 2020

Registration not open yet
App Store

Latest News

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 2 of 2

*Early bird tickets go on sale September 28th* Here are the remaining ...

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 1 of 2

We're a few short months away from the PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 an ...

Reader Poll: Which Topics Should Be Covered at the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference?

Planning is well underway for the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference and we' ...

PFRE Conference 2020 Announcement

As many of you know, last year we hosted the first-ever PFRE Conferenc ...



The PFRE podcast is focused on having meaningful conversations with world-class photographers, business professionals and industry leaders, with the goal to inform and inspire.
All Podcasts

Coming Soon...



PFRE prides itself on the depth and breadth of the information and professional development resources it makes available to our community. Our goal is to help real estate and interior photographers be successful while bringing the community together and elevating the industry as a whole.


Coming Soon...

Real Estate Photography Demand By State - From Google Correlate

Published: 01/09/2014
By: larry

REPdemandI've talked many times in the past about about how shows how it's possible to see what countries and cities in the world originate the most google searches for real estate photography and thus have the most demand for real estate photgraphy. What's always been difficult in the past is to get more detailed data about which states have the most demand for real estate photography. With you can get the data only down to the largest metro areas.

When I talk to real estate photographers just starting out I keep hearing that in some states it's much harder to convince agents to use professional real estate photography in some places than others. So I've been looking for some way to get google trends like data for each state in the US. It turns out that you can now get that kind of data from google.

Just recently I was reading a NY Times article that talked about "google correlate". I'd never heard of that, but it turns out that if you go to and give it a term of real estate photography you get a heat map of the US showing which states do the most google searches for the term "real estate photography". In the map above the darkest green states (Hawai'i, Washington, Idaho, Arizona, Colorado, etc) have the highest demand (most google searches) for real estate photography. And you can download a CSV file of the data, which I've done here.

So what does this mean to the real estate photography community? Here is my best guess:

  1. This is the best relative measure of the demand for real estate photography by state that I've seen and it covers all states.
  2. I believe this measure roughly correlates to the feedback that I get that in some states it's harder to convince real estate agents to pay for professional real estate photography than other.
  3. It's not absolute. It just says if you are in the real estate photography business in Bismarck, North Dakota expect to work harder at building your business than if you were in Seattle or Honolulu.
  4. Even though this is listed by state it's really about cities. That is, I know from experience that the Washington data is about Seattle and the Oregon data is mostly about Portland. That is, I know that while the demand for real estate photography is high in King County (the area around Seattle) it's not high in other rural areas of Washington like Spokane or Bellingham. So the biggest city in the state dominates the data.
  5. This data will likely change over time if demand (google searches for real estate photography) changes. I'm interested in tracking this measure over time and seeing how it changes.

Surprises in this data: Based on the number of real estate photographers from ID and MA, I find it surprising that the ID demand is number three between WA and AZ and that MA is #34 between MI and NJ. All the rest of the ranking in demand I find believeable. The ID and MA data may have a problem or this may reflect recent changes in demand.


11 comments on “Real Estate Photography Demand By State - From Google Correlate”

  1. I wonder how much the data is skewed by photographers searching those terms while either seeing what possible competition they have or might have, or simply looking for information on the subject. Wouldn't a better search term be "Real Estate Photographer", since that would be indicative of looking for someone who does that type of photography. I did a quick search for that, and the map changed considerably. My state (VA) showed a less negative number than the more generic "Real Estate Photography" term

  2. Hi Larry,
    It was interesting comparing real estate photography vs. real estate photographer which is a term more likely used by people/companies searching for a real estate photographer. Thanks for alerting us to another good search / seo tool. Best Regards, Ron

  3. What I find interesting is I'm from the Hampton Roads Metro area of Virginia and I tried for years to find an agent that was willing to use a professional photographer. Not long after I moved to New Mexico, I found work. Here in NM they can see the difference in quality and in VA they could not.

  4. @Tim & Ron - Yes, you are probably right RE photographer is a better term than RE photography and it does change the results significantly.

  5. Earlier this year I seriously contemplated relocating my photography business. Having done a lot of due diligence in the process, I can say what the map shows roughly approximates what I found.

    I also did a fair amount of research on the number of RE photogs in respective areas. A search for real estate photographer would likely be more reflective of 'us' than the 'demand' for us. Given enough time, aggregating the results across a number of applicable terms would probably be quite useful.

    Thanks for the pointer.

  6. Very interesting Larry,

    And very helpful...But there are so many variables here....

    First, different parts of the country have different markets. A hot market may have more searches for real estate photographers than a quiet one. But the quiet market may use more professional photography per capita.

    Location within a given state matters. As you said, "its about cities". NY seems very low on the list, but then NY is like two different states. The southern tip uses pro photography far more than the vast expanse of upstate NY. So I guess the impact of NYC and surrounds is diluted. In Westchester, the switch to pro-photography has been under way for a while. Agents still hate to pay for it, but their sellers are calling the shots

    The other issue is that as far as opportunities are concerned, high demand areas can be deceptive since the big tour companies fly in like vultures once it looks like they can make money. Lots of people using pro-photography around here, but they want it dirt cheap. I'm sure similar things are happening in states like WA.

    So each area is very unique...Each photographer has to assess their market and look at the variables within their immediate sphere....

    Just my $0.02. Happy Labor Day!

  7. interesting. when you search for real estate photographer you get completely new results. I'm in FL and that seems to be a rather light search for the term, which I find odd considering our market.

  8. The map is interesting. I live in Idaho and it fascinates me that we score so highly. There is a caveat, however. Lest anyone think that this high interest in RE photography equates to money, guess again. I do all kinds of commercial and editorial photography here. I recently shot two realtors at a new listing for an article in our local business newspaper. We chatted and I inquired about what they did for photography. They replied that they hire a women out of a small town in the burbs who does this for.....$35 per listing. 25 shots for MLS. I checked her work and, while it isn't remarkable in any way that would gain her notice here, they are nonetheless better than what the realtors could probably do for themselves. Of course I told them they could send her as many of those as they want. But it illustrates how geography can effect the marketplace. Idaho is at or near the top of the list for minimum wage jobs. We're near the bottom in median per capita income. Buy a used Nikon D70, change the oil in the Hyundai and make fractionally more than you would at McDonald's. It all flows from there. I have a few real estate clients, residential and commercial, and continue to look for more. But, I'm not aggressively pursuing residential work. $35 is a new low, but there are also several people out there charging somewhere in the range of $65-$95 per house. This has caused me to charge far less than what I should. Out-of-state assignments are still my best bet.

  9. @Pete Any chance Sun Valley (celebs) or Coeur d'Alene, or maybe Grand Targhee skew the stats? Heck, I almost moved to Boise earlier this year... when I drove through, I'm pretty sure I smelled money.

  10. RE Photographers will find well paying work where the avg sales price exceeds $500k. 5 figure commissions after broker split leaves some earnings for the agent. Remember the agents pay the photographer out of pocket on a contingency deal. Very few agents will pay 5-10% of the potential earnings on top of broker split and taxes in a low priced market.
    In a hot market, if the listing sells before the ink is dry on the listing agreement, why add expense?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *