PFRE is the original online resource for real estate and interior photographers. Since 2006, it has been a community hub where like-minded professionals from around the world gather to share information with a common goal of improving their work and advancing their business. With thousands of articles, covering hundreds of topics, PFRE offers the most robust collection of educational material in our field. The history of real estate photography has been documented within these pages.
All Articles


Author: Brian Berkowitz When it comes to real estate photography, the first thing that always comes to mind are phrases like “how big is the home?”, “what’s the listing price?”, “will the homeowners be there?”, or even “will the agent/client be there?” ...



The PFRE Community Forum is an online resource for discussing the art and business of Real Estate and Interior Photography.
Join The Discussion


View Now


For over a decade, photographers from around the world have participated in PFRE’s monthly photography contests, culminating in the year-end crowning of PFRE’s Photographer of the Year. With a new theme each month and commentary offered by some of the finest real estate & interior photographers anywhere, these contests offer a fun, competitive environment with rich learning opportunities. 

Contest Rules


View / Submit


View Archive


PFRE’s Annual Conference in Las Vegas provides real estate and interior photographers from around the world an opportunity to meet on an annual basis, to learn, share best practices and make connections. Many of the leading names in our field are selected to speak on topics aimed at improving our craft and advancing our business. It’s a comfortable, relaxed environment that is fun, easy to get to, and affordable.


PFRE Conference 2020

Register Now

Latest News

Stream the Entire 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference Now!

On November 20th and 21st 2020, 537 attendees from 21 different countr ...

Sneak Peek - PFRE Virtual Conference 2020

We are less than two weeks away from the PFRE Virtual Conference. Chec ...

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 2 of 2

Purchase Full Conference Replay Here Here are the remaining 13 present ...

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 1 of 2

We're a few short months away from the PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 an ...



The PFRE podcast is focused on having meaningful conversations with world-class photographers, business professionals and industry leaders, with the goal to inform and inspire.
All Podcasts

Coming Soon...



PFRE prides itself on the depth and breadth of the information and professional development resources it makes available to our community. Our goal is to help real estate and interior photographers be successful while bringing the community together and elevating the industry as a whole.


Coming Soon...

Photoshop vs Luminar: Sky Replacement Tool Comparison

Published: 13/11/2020
By: Brandon

Author: Colin Robertson

Adobe finally copied the one Luminar tool I use. How does it stack up? Here's a summary of my experience comparing the two AI-powered tools:

Photoshop Pros:

  • You get a layer mask that you can edit
  • No need to use a separate plug-in
  • Ability to build your own sky library using Creative Cloud


  • Results aren't as good
  • Fewer controls to fine-tune the sky replacement
  • Has crashed Photoshop several times during use

Luminar Pros:

  • Generates a far more convincing effect
  • Less detail loss and virtually no haloing
  • Has more controls to fine-tune the sky replacement


  • Controls to fine-tune the mask are obscurely named (i.e. "Sky Global", "Sky Local") and not obvious, resulting in lots of fiddling around to get the best result.
  • Sometimes the sky will "bleed through" onto building surfaces that have a similar tone and contrast to the sky.
  • The mask editing tools are no good.
  • You can't generate an editable mask.
  • You need to buy and run a separate piece of software.

I have compared both sky replacement features using the same sky, fiddled with the "Shift Edge" and "Fade Edge" sliders and my results are just never as good in Photoshop; and that's when it doesn't crash. In this comparison, (ignoring the different sky) you can get a good idea of how much better Luminar is at recognizing what is sky and what isn't.

Luminar isn't perfect either, but I'm seeing lots of detail loss in the trees and haloing around the building edge with Photoshop. Yes, I could fix the mask, but it's faster to get to a good result in Luminar and I plan to keep using it until Adobe catches up.

I don't want to be too down on Adobe here. I think using the new sky replacement tool could be a great starting point to a high-end, more manual replacement where you want maximum control. I've even used it to generate a quick mask to fix a sky replacement I did in Luminar where the sky bled through to the building (but otherwise looked great). Given Adobe's push into AI in the past few years, I have every expectation that this tool will eventually catch up to Luminar's genuinely impressive technology. For now, I still consider Luminar a great value and a must-buy if you find yourself regularly doing sky replacements; even if that's all you use it for.