Reading
blue-triangle-element

Articles

PFRE is the original online resource for real estate and interior photographers. Since 2006, it has been a community hub where like-minded professionals from around the world gather to share information with a common goal of improving their work and advancing their business. With thousands of articles, covering hundreds of topics, PFRE offers the most robust collection of educational material in our field. The history of real estate photography has been documented within these pages.
All Articles
blue-triangle-element

Latest

Have you ever walked into a room because you had to go get something and by the time you got there, you forgot what you were supposed to get? I don't know about you but this happens to me all the time! It's happened so frequently lately that I started ...

COMMUNITY
blue-triangle-element

Forum

The PFRE Community Forum is an online resource for discussing the art and business of Real Estate and Interior Photography.
Join The Discussion
blue-triangle-element

Latest

View Now
Contest
blue-triangle-element

OVERVIEW

For over a decade, photographers from around the world have participated in PFRE’s monthly photography contests, culminating in the year-end crowning of PFRE’s Photographer of the Year. With a new theme each month and commentary offered by some of the finest real estate & interior photographers anywhere, these contests offer a fun, competitive environment with rich learning opportunities. 

Contest Rules
blue-triangle-element

CURRENT CONTESTS

View / Submit
blue-triangle-element

PAST CONTESTS

View Archive
Conference
blue-triangle-element

Conference

PFRE’s Annual Conference in Las Vegas provides real estate and interior photographers from around the world an opportunity to meet on an annual basis, to learn, share best practices and make connections. Many of the leading names in our field are selected to speak on topics aimed at improving our craft and advancing our business. It’s a comfortable, relaxed environment that is fun, easy to get to, and affordable.
blue-triangle-element

Upcoming

PFRE Conference 2020

Register Now
blue-triangle-element

Latest News

Limited Early Bird Spots on Sale Now! PFRE Virtual Conference 2020

The roster of presenters is full, and the PFRE Virtual Conference is o ...

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 2 of 2

*Early bird tickets go on sale September 28th* Here are the remaining ...

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 1 of 2

We're a few short months away from the PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 an ...

Reader Poll: Which Topics Should Be Covered at the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference?

Planning is well underway for the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference and we' ...

Podcast
blue-triangle-element

Podcasts

The PFRE podcast is focused on having meaningful conversations with world-class photographers, business professionals and industry leaders, with the goal to inform and inspire.
All Podcasts

Coming Soon...

Resources
blue-triangle-element

Resources

PFRE prides itself on the depth and breadth of the information and professional development resources it makes available to our community. Our goal is to help real estate and interior photographers be successful while bringing the community together and elevating the industry as a whole.
blue-triangle-element

Directory

Coming Soon...

New Hampshire Moves Towards Prohibiting Aerial Real Estate Photography

In: 
Published: 21/02/2013
By: larry

NH-HB619Thanks to Suzanne Feinberg for sending me a link to the article over a PhotoAttorney.com that points out that the New Hampshire State legislature is considering a bill (HB 619-FN) that would make aerial real estate photography illegal.

The bill in part says:

A person is guilty of a class A misdemeanor if such person knowingly creates or assists in creating an image of the exterior of any residential dwelling in this state where such image is created by or with the assistance of a satellite, drone, or any device that is not supported by the ground. This prohibition shall not apply where the image does not reveal forms identifiable as human beings or man-made objects. In this paragraph, “dwelling” means any building, structure, or portion thereof which is occupied as, or designed or intended for occupancy as, a residence by one or more individuals.

Based on the public discussion that I've seen on this subject, I'm going to go out on a limb and make a wild guess and predict that this is not going to be an isolated incident. My guess is that other states will be doing this too. Particularly since so many cities are resisting use of UAVs by law enforcement.

So does this mean that if HB 619-FN is passes New Hampshire will disappear from the satellite layer of  Google Maps? I guess so.

20 comments on “New Hampshire Moves Towards Prohibiting Aerial Real Estate Photography”

  1. As that is written, you couldn't even rent a helicopter for an ariel photo. But, I wonder if you built a platform with helium balloons and anchored it to the ground for support...thus is the problem with writing laws. Create the loophole with their own restrictive definition. Seriously though, it was written and processed through the criminal justice committee with a focus on personal privacy that drives it. It doesn't address the issue where the owner of the property doesn't desire the privacy.

  2. If the bill pass, I will buy a few cherry pickers and rent them out in NH. There's always a way to make things happen. I can see both sides of the issue and I agree with LarryG about not addressing the issue where the home owner doesn't desire the privacy, I also understand the privacy concerns that could've lead to this bill. Staying private is getting harder with the tech advances and there are ill intended people that could use areal photos and not for real estate, but I guess that's stating the obvious.
    In conclusion there are other ways to get elevated pictures and I guess we have to focus on the solution and not the problem in this case.

  3. When the politicians get going, it rapidly becomes "everyone but us" in the line of thinking. They don't research it, they just jump. Tell me, how many deaths, thefts, accidents, injuries, etc., can we now definitely attribute to remote controlled aircraft? What about the hobbyist, can they no longer fly these things? What ever happened to common sense? Government killed it, since it is well beyong their scope or capabilities to think such things through.

  4. I'm a pilot, and I'd guess that the FAA, which is very jealous of its regulatory turf, is going to have something to say about this.

    And it flies in the face of the well established principal that if something is visible to the public it can be photographed. There are restrictions on the publication of pictures that invade someone's privacy, but just "creating an image" is surely going to face a legal challenge.

    You might also want to Google "The Streisand effect".

  5. In regard to Greg Peterson's comment, this is not an issue. All that would be required would be for the homeowner to sign a release, just as anyone does that is concerned about their privacy being invaded. Why is an aerial of your home suddenly a huge issue? I was always taught to "follow the money".

    As someone that has done aerials of many things, inclulding real estate, for many years, I smell a power play.

  6. Larry
    Thanks for keeping us up to date on the latest developments in the politics of UAV's and commercial photography. Everyday I see clips on TV programs and nationally distributed TV commercials that were captured with UAV's.
    The FAA is keeping us guessing on what will happen with their regs and I think the net effect is that only a few bold UAV operators are marketing their services at this time and a large portion, like 95% are doing business and keeping it quiet.
    So the general public, lawmakers and the FAA are not aware of the size of the underground UAV aerial industry that they are trying to regulate.
    When we started investigating using small UAV's for aerial photography and video I was amazed at the size of the hobby industry, how many remote control aerial craft are around us, and just how simple it is to build a UAV that will carry a camera. We are about to see an explosion of ready to fly affordable craft that will enable anyone to start capturing aerial images. DJI for instance just came out with an affordable quad built specifically to carry a gopro camera called the Phantom.
    This is already getting interesting and the regulators and over zealous lawmakers are just getting warmed up. Larry please keep these post coming as the drama unfolds and thanks for trying to keep up with the developments.

  7. I think Heath sums up the current situation accurately. The clear enforceable laws for UAV's are few so confusion is on this subject is high. Yet I can only find evidence of only two commercial operators that have been explicitly shutdown, Rusty Freeman and Daniel Gárate both in California. In other states UAV operators appear to be operating without interference.

    My concern is that commercial UAV operators need to be aware of the risk of investing heavily in UAV equipment. There is potential for public paranoia about UAVs to force State or Federal laws in unexpected directions... like New Hampshire.

  8. How many real estate photographers making their living shooting footage shot by drones/UAV's? None in my market. How many houses have been sold just because of aerial footage? Probably the same answer. What are the benefits to a real estate photographer of the unrestricted use of drones? Who would be the biggest benefactors? Follow the money, here is a list of drone manufactures in this country. http://www.auvsi.org/MembershipandChapters/CorporateMembers
    It is all about surveillance, therefore there must be restrictions.
    Land of the free? Do not confuse complying or acquiescing with the National Security State as freedom.

  9. Oregon is trying to pass a similar bill to ban drones. The way the bill is written it would even outlaw some childrens toys. Many are for the bill, but with changes needed. I have friends that film sports from RC helicopters, and I know of a couple of real estate photographers that use them. The way the bill is written, these would be against the law.

  10. there's so many things wrong with this law. what about if you take a drone to take pictures of your own house? you won't even be capable of that. what about google earth and other services? those use satellite imagines. but it only says satellites and drones. but you can fly over anything yourself and take pictures. what about rc hovercrafts? those can be drones too. they are rc controlled. what is the definition of a drone? what if you control it using a cable?
    seams to be that this law is so stupid that you can still use drones if they are connected to the ground. just add a cable and you are legal again.
    really... only in usa such a thing would happen.

  11. @Pedro- Well at least in New Hampshire you don't get arrested for owning a Drone like you will in Oregon. Yep, under these laws the whole US will soon be disappearing from Google Earth.

  12. Well I guess I may hold off on ordering the drone and just use my ar.drone I bought a few months back just for fun!

    This is getting a little out of hand really..they should make it so you can get permission from a home owner in writing to use on the property and not higher then a certain height.

  13. This is clearly a poorly thought out bill. Thinking it through, I believe that the bill is aimed at the paparazzi. It is a (poor) attempt at preventing the paparazzi from photography people in their backyard without their consent. That is the only line of reasoning that I could see that would validate such a measure. If you are in New Hampshire I would suggest that you write the Representative and ask that the clause "without owner or occupants consent" be added.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

magnifiercrossmenucross-circle