PFRE is the original online resource for real estate and interior photographers. Since 2006, it has been a community hub where like-minded professionals from around the world gather to share information with a common goal of improving their work and advancing their business. With thousands of articles, covering hundreds of topics, PFRE offers the most robust collection of educational material in our field. The history of real estate photography has been documented within these pages.
All Articles


For most real estate photographers, poor weather can make or break our day and create painful scheduling challenges for days to come. Mainstream weather reports are notoriously inaccurate, and depending on your location, weather can change with little ...



The PFRE Community Forum is an online resource for discussing the art and business of Real Estate and Interior Photography.
Join The Discussion


View Now


For over a decade, photographers from around the world have participated in PFRE’s monthly photography contests, culminating in the year-end crowning of PFRE’s Photographer of the Year. With a new theme each month and commentary offered by some of the finest real estate & interior photographers anywhere, these contests offer a fun, competitive environment with rich learning opportunities. 

Contest Rules


PFRE’s Annual Conference in Las Vegas provides real estate and interior photographers from around the world an opportunity to meet on an annual basis, to learn, share best practices and make connections. Many of the leading names in our field are selected to speak on topics aimed at improving our craft and advancing our business. It’s a comfortable, relaxed environment that is fun, easy to get to, and affordable.


PFRE 2020-16-9

PFRE Conference 2020

Registration not open yet
App Store

Latest News

Reader Poll: Which Topics Should Be Covered at the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference?

Planning is well underway for the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference and we' ...

PFRE Conference 2020 Announcement

As many of you know, last year we hosted the first-ever PFRE Conferenc ...



The PFRE podcast is focused on having meaningful conversations with world-class photographers, business professionals and industry leaders, with the goal to inform and inspire.
All Podcasts

Coming Soon...



PFRE prides itself on the depth and breadth of the information and professional development resources it makes available to our community. Our goal is to help real estate and interior photographers be successful while bringing the community together and elevating the industry as a whole.


Coming Soon...

Is It Better To Use A Single Lightroom Catalog or Multiple Catalogs For Real Estate Photography?

Published: 13/10/2015
By: larry

SingleVsMultiCatalogAngel in Barcalona asks:

Nowadays, I'm reconsidering my workflow and I'm curious about if the most experienced real estate photographers are using one catalog in LR for each shoot or if all the shoots are included in the same catalog (every one in its folder, of course!)

I think you'll find that most low volume photographers that have everything in one catalog but some that break their photos down into smaller catalogs.

Scott Kelby the, Lightroom author, claims that in the early versions of Lightroom processing use to be slower with large catalogues but with the latest versions of Lightroom processing doesn't slow down noticeably with large catalogs. However, I've noticed that with large catalogues backing up the catalogue up and moving it takes much longer.

I think it comes down to your personal organisation preferences. There are pros and cons to both having everything in once catalogue and having a catalogue for each shoot. The video above from SLR Lounge  gives a more in depth explanation:

One catalog for everything

  • Pros: Easier and quicker to use, Easy to find things
  • Cons: Slower speed if you are a high volume photographer, More difficult to archive or move catalogues

A Catalog for each shoot

  • Pros: Best performance, Backups are faster, Easier to move catalogues
  • Cons: Harder to find things

So my recommendation would be for most photographers is to use a single catalogue but for very high volume photographers use a multi-catalogue workflow.

6 comments on “Is It Better To Use A Single Lightroom Catalog or Multiple Catalogs For Real Estate Photography?”

  1. I put all of my real estate into one catalog. That catalog also has a copy of my cloud, fire, b/w public domain images, some of my landscape photos and misc things that I use as replacements for RE work. All of my timelapse is in another catalog. etc etc. My biggest catalog contains much of my personal project stuff and just lots and lots of images of the world around me.

    Since LR is not duplicating files, it's easy to have photos in several catalogs without eating up disk space. I convert my RAW files to .dng on import to incorporate my editing information into the image file rather than having .xmp side car files.

    I bet that Scott Kelby is upgrading his computer about as often as PS/LR making any slow downs from larger catalogs less obvious. My Mac is a couple of years old and I do notice the difference in speed between my smaller and larger catalogs. A solid state drive will probably help boost performance, but I just bought more flashes, so I'm out of funds again.

    I've only photographed about 200 homes so far this year, so my RE catalog for the year isn't monstrous. I don't think that I would see enough of a difference in speed by splitting off into smaller catalogs, such as by quarter, and one catalog for each job might speed things up a tiny bit, but I'd have hundreds of LR catalogs to hunt through if I wanted to find something in particular.

    If I am bringing my laptop with me to ingest photos of a job while working at another or while having a break between homes, I will make an individual catalog for the job to make it easier to merge into my RE catalog on my main computer at the office. I have lens corrections and conversion to .dng on import set up as part of my usual workflow at the office, so if those tasks as well as generating previews is taken care of before I head home, I can get to processing the images faster.

  2. I am a fairly high volume shooter. I shoot mostly editorial and architecture with a few real estate gigs here and there. I noticed that I really only access photos that I shot in the last 6 months. Anything older then that only gets accessed if I'm updating my website or putting together a PDF portfolio for a potential client. So my work flow has been to create a current year catalog and a second catalog with all other years. The current year lightroom catalog LRT file lives on my internal SSD drive for better performance. I work mostly in the current year catalog and only access the other other catalog maybe a few times a month. The current year catalog is about 10% the size of the other catalog. All the files live on the same drive which is backed up nightly.

  3. Personally I think that the catalog is the worst part of LightRoom. It's the main reason that I do not use the program. Lots of other programs have catalog equivalents, but most let you work with the program without forcing you to use it. I find that DXO gives far superior results anyways.

  4. We used a catalog for each day. We use a coding system so that we can find the catalog based on the day we shot the photos. Not hard to find. We rarely have to go back anyway.

  5. I have three catalogs; Architecture, Outdoor Adventure, and Weddings. My Architecture catalog has almost 64,000 files in it from full frame cameras and speed is not a problem. I update my computer every three years to the best macbook pro available with all the upgrades. I find it very useful to have all the architecture shoots in one catalog because I am often searching for past shoots for a variety of reasons, mostly to relicense the images to another broker, builder, architect, etc. For this reason I find it important to have the address in the Caption info to make searching easier.

  6. I create a new catalog for every shoot which keeps everything nice and clean and optimal performance. If I ever have a need to go back to a previous shoot (rarely) I simply do so thru windows explorer since my file structure is organized and I keep all the exported JPGs. I do delete all the RAW files after a job is completed. The idea of having 200+ folders and collections that I will most likely never use again in LR every time I process a shoot makes me shudder.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *