PFRE is the original online resource for real estate and interior photographers. Since 2006, it has been a community hub where like-minded professionals from around the world gather to share information with a common goal of improving their work and advancing their business. With thousands of articles, covering hundreds of topics, PFRE offers the most robust collection of educational material in our field. The history of real estate photography has been documented within these pages.
All Articles


Woman tweaking the pixels per inch of her images in Lightroom

Do you want to create more defined real estate photos? We're sharing how many pixels per inch can produce high-quality image resolution.



The PFRE Community Forum is an online resource for discussing the art and business of Real Estate and Interior Photography.
Join The Discussion


View Now


For over a decade, photographers from around the world have participated in PFRE’s monthly photography contests, culminating in the year-end crowning of PFRE’s Photographer of the Year. With a new theme each month and commentary offered by some of the finest real estate & interior photographers anywhere, these contests offer a fun, competitive environment with rich learning opportunities. 

Contest Rules


View / Submit


View Archive


PFRE prides itself on the depth and breadth of the information and professional development resources it makes available to our community. Our goal is to help real estate and interior photographers be successful while bringing the community together and elevating the industry as a whole.

Conference News

No items found

Is a Tilt-Shift Lens the Right Tool for the Job?

Published: 01/06/2020

Author: Garey Gomez

The case AGAINST using a tilt-shift lens:

I have long felt that for most real estate photographers, it's not a necessary tool, despite the indisputable fact that they are very useful in many circumstances. But that assumes you are a full-time real estate photographer, possibly shooting a mid-to-high volume of homes where efficiency is just as important as quality. In that scenario, logically, I feel that a zoom lens is far more versatile and efficient.

I have also observed in various online groups where photographers share their photos that when a tilt-shift lens is used, it is rarely used beyond the most basic problem-solving use cases (higher camera height in a kitchen, and shifted down; or shifted up for an exterior photo), which can be done 99% of the time by using the "fake tilt-shift method", where you intentionally tilt the camera to get the framing you want, and correct verticals in post with a slight crop.

In that case, I don't see any value in using a tilt-shift lens for real estate photography. It is not adding anything to the image compared to faking it. The loss in pixels and the marginal loss of image quality is hardly worth discussing when the photos are destined for the MLS, and there are a couple of associated downsides: First is, if you are spending time changing lenses instead of using a far more versatile zoom lens (loss of time, less efficiency; time = money), and the second is, if you are not changing lenses and are instead shooting all of your photos at one focal length (no variety, default mode of operation instead of using a focal length that better suits the scene in front of your camera). Compositions can change dramatically at different focal lengths and a zoom lens can offer many more possibilities when moving quickly.

The case FOR using a tilt-shift lens:

I own tilt-shift lenses, and they are AMAZING creative tools and problem-solving tools. There simply is no replacement for what they can do. As soon as a photographer embraces all of the lens's movements and begins seeing new compositions that were previously impossible, there is no going back to conventional lenses.

There is a limit to what can be accomplished with the "fake tilt-shift method". You can only get away with it to a point, beyond which, objects in the photo become too distorted. This is where a tilt-shift lens surpasses the work-around method with a conventional lens. It is far more versatile while still retaining the correct perspective with minimal or no distortion.

It depends on...

  • What are your goals? Who are your clients, and will your clients know the difference? Will you know the difference? How will you use the lens?
  • There is a trade-off on both sides of the discussion, and it really depends on what works for you. Start with knowing what the lens will do for you, and go from there. It's totally up to you!
  • I personally don't often bring my tilt-shift lenses to my real estate shoots unless I know I'm shooting something special and I'm shooting at a rate that justifies the extra time on site.
  • Do you shoot with tilt-shift lenses? Why or why not? Can you speak about shooting high volume with or without tilt-shift lenses? I am not a high volume shooter, so I am particularly interested in hearing from those who are.

Garey Gomez is an interiors/architectural photographer based in Decatur, GA. He is also the creator of the "Mastering Real Estate Photography" video tutorial series

Garey Gomez