PFRE is the original online resource for real estate and interior photographers. Since 2006, it has been a community hub where like-minded professionals from around the world gather to share information with a common goal of improving their work and advancing their business. With thousands of articles, covering hundreds of topics, PFRE offers the most robust collection of educational material in our field. The history of real estate photography has been documented within these pages.
All Articles


Have you ever walked into a room because you had to go get something and by the time you got there, you forgot what you were supposed to get? I don't know about you but this happens to me all the time! It's happened so frequently lately that I started ...



The PFRE Community Forum is an online resource for discussing the art and business of Real Estate and Interior Photography.
Join The Discussion


View Now


For over a decade, photographers from around the world have participated in PFRE’s monthly photography contests, culminating in the year-end crowning of PFRE’s Photographer of the Year. With a new theme each month and commentary offered by some of the finest real estate & interior photographers anywhere, these contests offer a fun, competitive environment with rich learning opportunities. 

Contest Rules


View / Submit


View Archive


PFRE’s Annual Conference in Las Vegas provides real estate and interior photographers from around the world an opportunity to meet on an annual basis, to learn, share best practices and make connections. Many of the leading names in our field are selected to speak on topics aimed at improving our craft and advancing our business. It’s a comfortable, relaxed environment that is fun, easy to get to, and affordable.


PFRE Conference 2020

Register Now

Latest News

Limited Early Bird Spots on Sale Now! PFRE Virtual Conference 2020

The roster of presenters is full, and the PFRE Virtual Conference is o ...

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 2 of 2

*Early bird tickets go on sale September 28th* Here are the remaining ...

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 1 of 2

We're a few short months away from the PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 an ...

Reader Poll: Which Topics Should Be Covered at the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference?

Planning is well underway for the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference and we' ...



The PFRE podcast is focused on having meaningful conversations with world-class photographers, business professionals and industry leaders, with the goal to inform and inspire.
All Podcasts

Coming Soon...



PFRE prides itself on the depth and breadth of the information and professional development resources it makes available to our community. Our goal is to help real estate and interior photographers be successful while bringing the community together and elevating the industry as a whole.


Coming Soon...

If You Break A 2600 Year Archaeological Specimen Worth $300,000 During A Shoot Are You Covered?

Published: 04/05/2012
By: larry

According to a recent article in PDN:

According to a lawsuit filed April 24 in New York state supreme court, the 2,600 year-old archaeological specimen was destroyed when "photographers" hired by Art + Auction magazine to photograph the statue moved it. The "photographers" aren't named in the lawsuit, which is against Art + Auction's owner, Louise Blouin Media. But the New York papers have identified the photographer as fashion shooter Eric Guillemain.

When this kind of problem comes up you want to have a good solid insurance company to turn the whole ugly thing over to.

Along with general business liability insurance you need to have  your equipment insured. You should be able to get a general business insurance policy that covers your business for liability and for loss of your equipment for somewhere between $500 to $1,200 a year depending on the details and extent of your coverage.

Here are some contacts for business insurance brokers that specialize in coverage for Photographers:

Check out what works best for you, you’ll be glad you did. I'm sure Eric Guillemain is glad he had an insurance company to turn his problem over to!

7 comments on “If You Break A 2600 Year Archaeological Specimen Worth $300,000 During A Shoot Are You Covered?”

  1. Actually, according to the article -- liability insurance typically won't pay for something like that, because it is "property of others in the care, custody or control of the insured" (aka not covered).

    This is something I've worried / wondered about -- I'm always shooting on location in people's homes, I've got a tripod and light stands I'm moving around; sometimes I'm doing minor rearrangements of items. I assumed my liability insurance would cover me if I screw up, but sounds like it may not -- I'll need to revisit my policy to confirm.

    And be EXTRA careful on future shoots!

  2. Ahhh...That will buff right out. 🙂

    While the "property of other's in care" clause would set up the insurance battle on which insurance company cover - yours or the homeowner's, more concerning is the "prop" exclusion clause. Essentially, if taking a picture of a home, everything in is - by a selfserving definition - is considered a prop.

  3. I don't known how it works there but here I'm covered when I visit a house with a client, or a photographer. Imagine that I go to a clients house to shoot some photos with a photographer and the photographer destroys something, MY insurance will cover that.

  4. I spoke with my insurance agent, Richard Reyes, with Hill & Usher today about this. In MY specific case, my insurance covers up to $5,000 for items in my "care, custody & control" and I also have coverage for props, etc.
    The explanation about "care, custody & control" is this: If I accept an object to photograph or if I personally touch and object to move it, even to protect it then that object is under my "care, custody and control". If I'm there to photograph a home and not a specific object and I damage that object it is covered under my general liability policy, up to the limits of the policy, again, UNLESS I pick it up or move it.
    Bottom line is - If you need something moved ask the homeowner or the owner of the object to move it!


  5. imo bottom line never say you "moved" something. just say you inadvertently destroyed it. $5000 is really low... My insurance is 150000€ and I think it's low. lol
    I also advertise the insurance, it's one more good thing to mention and clients never really think about it.
    Never used the insurance. Fortunately never happened to me. But I known some cases where bad things happened. But generally just small things. The bigger one I knew was an agency that was stolen with all the keys from hundreds of properties on it, the insurance paid for all the new locks and keys for all clients.

  6. The "care, custody and control" is $5K. My GL coverage is $2M / $4M and also includes coverage for my equipment, fire etc. I generally don't accept items to photography and if I break something in a venue that I'm photographing GL will cover it, AND I NEVER move anything!

  7. I learned my lessons early. DON'T TOUCH NOTHIN! I had a homeowner say I tracked mud into a room I hadn't even walked into. I've backed up into (and broke) two lamps. I left the door open and an expensive cat ran outside. I've opened blinds that everyone (but me) knew not to open, because they didn't come back down. Silly stuff, and worked out fine, but not funny when they want you to pay for it.

    34,000+ shoots since, and no problems. 🙂

    We carry liability insurance, of course, and we also require our contract photographers to carry their own insurance, plus all my customers must sign off on our terms and conditions which say...

    Client agrees to defend and hold Company and photographer harmless regarding any damage to property or furniture, including accusations of theft. In the event that photographer accidentally breaks or otherwise damages personal property while in the course of photographing the property, client agrees to reimburse seller for any and all expenses involved and will not demand reimbursement from Company or photographer.

    In addition, we expressly state in our client correspondence that our photographers are not permitted to move anything.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *