PFRE is the original online resource for real estate and interior photographers. Since 2006, it has been a community hub where like-minded professionals from around the world gather to share information with a common goal of improving their work and advancing their business. With thousands of articles, covering hundreds of topics, PFRE offers the most robust collection of educational material in our field. The history of real estate photography has been documented within these pages.
All Articles


Have you ever walked into a room because you had to go get something and by the time you got there, you forgot what you were supposed to get? I don't know about you but this happens to me all the time! It's happened so frequently lately that I started ...



The PFRE Community Forum is an online resource for discussing the art and business of Real Estate and Interior Photography.
Join The Discussion


View Now


For over a decade, photographers from around the world have participated in PFRE’s monthly photography contests, culminating in the year-end crowning of PFRE’s Photographer of the Year. With a new theme each month and commentary offered by some of the finest real estate & interior photographers anywhere, these contests offer a fun, competitive environment with rich learning opportunities. 

Contest Rules


View / Submit


View Archive


PFRE’s Annual Conference in Las Vegas provides real estate and interior photographers from around the world an opportunity to meet on an annual basis, to learn, share best practices and make connections. Many of the leading names in our field are selected to speak on topics aimed at improving our craft and advancing our business. It’s a comfortable, relaxed environment that is fun, easy to get to, and affordable.


PFRE Conference 2020

Register Now

Latest News

Limited Early Bird Spots on Sale Now! PFRE Virtual Conference 2020

The roster of presenters is full, and the PFRE Virtual Conference is o ...

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 2 of 2

*Early bird tickets go on sale September 28th* Here are the remaining ...

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 1 of 2

We're a few short months away from the PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 an ...

Reader Poll: Which Topics Should Be Covered at the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference?

Planning is well underway for the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference and we' ...



The PFRE podcast is focused on having meaningful conversations with world-class photographers, business professionals and industry leaders, with the goal to inform and inspire.
All Podcasts

Coming Soon...



PFRE prides itself on the depth and breadth of the information and professional development resources it makes available to our community. Our goal is to help real estate and interior photographers be successful while bringing the community together and elevating the industry as a whole.


Coming Soon...

Get Your Local NAR Involved In Your State's Discussion About Drone Legislation

Published: 25/02/2014
By: larry

NARlobbyforUAVsIn a post last week I suggested pointed out that: Anyone interested in commercial use of RCMA in the future should be tracking legislation in their state and be giving regular rational input to their state legislators on the subject to counterbalance all the irrational input they are getting. Because states are under pressure to act because the FAA has been so slow to act. If nothing is done many states my ban RCMA use.

Within 24 hours of when I did the post I heard from Tom Tezak on Maui who had just gotten wind of Hawaii's SB2608 that is under consideration and threatens to shut down RCMA use in Hawaii. Tom had come to the same conclusion that I did and has a great suggestion on exactly how to do it. Here is Tom's suggestion:

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) has one of the largest lobbying constituencies in the country, and I would encourage PFRE readers to encourage their Realtors to reach out to their respective boards and make them aware of the drone legislation that is starting to pop up around the country and get them involved. The real estate associations have a strong voice and more importantly a lot of votes.

Tom is right on! According to the NAR website:

NAR is the "Voice for Real Estate" and a lobbying group to be reckoned with. In fact, Fortune Magazine has ranked NAR among the 25 most powerful lobbying groups in the nation.

Most Agents are members of the NAR and will quickly appreciate the value of RCMA use in real estate marketing. So, make a point to discuss this issue with your clients. And for those of you that are Realtors talk to your local NAR government affairs representative and let them know how valuable RCMAs can be in marketing real estate.

11 comments on “Get Your Local NAR Involved In Your State's Discussion About Drone Legislation”

  1. Hey Larry, I just want to make your readers aware the picture you posted along side of this entry is not me...I don't wear long pants 🙂
    As for the local real estate boards and National association of Realtors they really are a great resource and your readers would be wise to make them aware. But it was interesting when I went to my board they were barely aware of the aerial possibilities to our industry, so it may take some educating

  2. As the local REALTOR association executive, I just sent a message to the Texas Association of REALTORS political affairs director requesting some time to discuss the impact of this legislation on real estate.

  3. Don't let Tom fool you... That's a photo I took of Tom about a year ago when he bought me lunch at the Wailea Golf Club:)

  4. It's easy to see Hawaii's concerns. I can imagine 2 dozen operators on Waikiki beach offering to record people learning to surf. Even if only a couple of companies were permitted to operate an RCMA at a given time, the beach is often very crowded and the risk of injuring somebody will be high.

    The Texas bill is a little strange that there is a provision requiring a property owner or occupant's to consent and another provision allowing a broker to use an RCMA. The property owner's consent seems like it would encompass both provisions. Of the brokers I know, I have a hard time visualizing them standing outside in a 3 piece suit flying a RCMA. Other provisions allow for an outside contractor, such as with law enforcement. The bill looks like an outline done quickly by somebody with only the fear of peeping toms and Big Brother on their minds.

    @Lee Jinks - The best approach might be to convince the TAR to form a small working group to draft a better bill (or the portion relating to RE needs). The group should included a person with RCMA or R/C experience, a photographer/videographer and an agent. Lawmakers are often too busy negotiating their bribes to spend much time crafting legislation and most are happy to have it all typed up for them in a neat package. Ever wonder why oil companies are exempt from clean air, clean water and other environmental regulations even though they are often the most polluting entities? I'll wager that they wrote the exemptions and sent them to their favorite pet politician. Yes, I'm rather cynical when it comes to the suits feeding at the public trough.

  5. The TX promulgated listing agreement has a catch all language authorizing the listing broker to market the property. Although I doubt the poo-bahs on the RE Comission in Austin know what a radio controlled vehicle is, one could argue that the broker has the property owner's permission.

  6. Through a few emails between the Texas Association of REALTORS Director of Legislative Affairs and me, I found that TAR was involved in getting the two exemptions added to the aforementioned bill (HB912), namely permission from the owner and for the purpose of real estate marketing (as long as no one is identifiable in the photos). So it looks like we are covered in Texas for the moment.

    My concern is with future FAA regulations. There seems to be some question as to the jurisdiction of the FAA. Generally the FAA controls aircraft above 500 feet. Does this mean the FAA has no jurisdiction over aircraft (manned or otherwise) below 500 feet? I would think the FAA would argue that they do have jurisdiction. If so, do FAA rules trump state laws concerning unmanned aircraft? As you can see, I only have questions and no answers.

  7. @Lee - As Peter Sachs argues persuasively at there are no enforceable laws governing below 400' only guidelines.

    Peter also points out that there is a 1946 supreme court decision ( United States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256 (1946)) that establishes that you don't control the airspace above your property... but that will likely change some due to UAVs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *