Reading
blue-triangle-element

Articles

PFRE is the original online resource for real estate and interior photographers. Since 2006, it has been a community hub where like-minded professionals from around the world gather to share information with a common goal of improving their work and advancing their business. With thousands of articles, covering hundreds of topics, PFRE offers the most robust collection of educational material in our field. The history of real estate photography has been documented within these pages.
All Articles
blue-triangle-element

Latest

Have you ever walked into a room because you had to go get something and by the time you got there, you forgot what you were supposed to get? I don't know about you but this happens to me all the time! It's happened so frequently lately that I started ...

COMMUNITY
blue-triangle-element

Forum

The PFRE Community Forum is an online resource for discussing the art and business of Real Estate and Interior Photography.
Join The Discussion
blue-triangle-element

Latest

View Now
Contest
blue-triangle-element

OVERVIEW

For over a decade, photographers from around the world have participated in PFRE’s monthly photography contests, culminating in the year-end crowning of PFRE’s Photographer of the Year. With a new theme each month and commentary offered by some of the finest real estate & interior photographers anywhere, these contests offer a fun, competitive environment with rich learning opportunities. 

Contest Rules
blue-triangle-element

CURRENT CONTESTS

View / Submit
blue-triangle-element

PAST CONTESTS

View Archive
Conference
blue-triangle-element

Conference

PFRE’s Annual Conference in Las Vegas provides real estate and interior photographers from around the world an opportunity to meet on an annual basis, to learn, share best practices and make connections. Many of the leading names in our field are selected to speak on topics aimed at improving our craft and advancing our business. It’s a comfortable, relaxed environment that is fun, easy to get to, and affordable.
blue-triangle-element

Upcoming

PFRE Conference 2020

Register Now
blue-triangle-element

Latest News

Limited Early Bird Spots on Sale Now! PFRE Virtual Conference 2020

The roster of presenters is full, and the PFRE Virtual Conference is o ...

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 2 of 2

*Early bird tickets go on sale September 28th* Here are the remaining ...

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 1 of 2

We're a few short months away from the PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 an ...

Reader Poll: Which Topics Should Be Covered at the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference?

Planning is well underway for the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference and we' ...

Podcast
blue-triangle-element

Podcasts

The PFRE podcast is focused on having meaningful conversations with world-class photographers, business professionals and industry leaders, with the goal to inform and inspire.
All Podcasts

Coming Soon...

Resources
blue-triangle-element

Resources

PFRE prides itself on the depth and breadth of the information and professional development resources it makes available to our community. Our goal is to help real estate and interior photographers be successful while bringing the community together and elevating the industry as a whole.
blue-triangle-element

Directory

Coming Soon...

DxOMark.com: Nikon D800 is Best Sensor Ever Analyzed!

Published: 23/05/2012
By: larry

Now that both the Nikon D800 and Canon 5D Mk III have been on the street for a while It's beginning to look like Nikon users are the big winner.

DxOMark.com, which analyzes DSLRs, sensors and lenses has given the sensor in the new Nikon D800 (see the full report here) their top ranked camera sensor, with a score higher than any preceding camera, including top medium format backs. And the D800 is $3,000 USD ($500 less than the 5D Mk III).

For contrast the DxOMark.com rating of the 5D Mk III is here. The 5D Mk III sensor rating is only slightly (3 DxOMark points) better than the 5D Mk II whereas the D800 is rated 15 DxOMark points better than the D700. Looks like Nikon may have hit it out of the park with this one!

Of coarse sensor performance is not everything. Handling, video features, etc are all important but those reviewing the D800 and the 5D Mk III (see here, here and here) seem to be very positive about the D800.

As Michael Riechmann says in his review, "Experienced photographers know that quality lenses trump everything else in the image quality chain. A good lens can make the most of a sub-par sensor, but a poor lens on a great sensor is a waste of money. To coin a phrase – a chain is only as strong as its weakest link, and this is especially true in the camera/lens equation". So if you are going to get a D800 for real estate you'd better also spring for the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 G ED wide angle lens, if you don't already have one, because you'll need top notch glass to get the best out of this top sensor!

But wait, Ken Rockwell says "screw Nikon", he likes his 5DMk III better than his D800 because of the handling. Who can you trust on these things?

 

14 comments on “DxOMark.com: Nikon D800 is Best Sensor Ever Analyzed!”

  1. Canon vs Nikon - will be an aged old battle of the features vs benefits in current models. One may be ahead with this model, but in the end - it really is the glass that counts the most - the biggest investment is in the glass and without good glass, your photos will look horrid. With the web - pixels have become moot because resolution is not important unless you are on billboards or posted up at Grand Central Station in New York City. Rather than saying one is better, one should compare up and down the line within the brand and try to migrate up as one improves his or her photography. Although Michael Reichman says a poor lens on a sensor is a waste of money - there is no waste of a $2500 lens on a Canon Mark 3. You cannot convince us that there is a better lens out there than the Canon 24 tSE for a DSLR. What he should have said was that having a one-step up from a point and shoot like a Rebel vs a Mark 3 - there is a huge difference in how the glass records the photo.
    People should get the Body and Lenses that meet the requirements of the work they specifically do. Reviews are just a guideline to help decide which are the tops from each manufacturer and why.

  2. As a Nikon shooter, it's pleasing to be on the Nikon side of the debate, but really... As incredibly good as these cameras are, does it really matter?

  3. Realistically I have to admit that even the IQ of my Canon 10D made images that were celebrated on billboards. I made 40x60 prints that still draw admiring comment in my studio. Moreover, as a business person, I was able to get a screaming deal on an additional mint 5DmkII after the intro of the mkIII. The AF ain't all that but I use live view on a tripod (even for portraits). My prints still look great and my architectural work goes to print at A4 or to the web.

    If I were a wedding photographer (Heaven forfend!) I would chose Nikon in an instant for its speed. As it is, I just admire them both.

  4. Ken Rockwell, who may have now lost his marbles with his tantrum at Nikon, says:
    http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/16-35mm.htm

    'The Nikon 16-35mm VR is the sharpest ultrawide zoom I've ever used. Under test conditions, it's even slightly sharper than the old king, the beastly Nikon 14-24mm.

    This Nikon 16-35mm is so good that there isn't much to write about. It's ultra-sharp, it has no significant light falloff in the corners, distortion is reasonable from 20-35mm, focus and zooming are easy and perfect, and it focuses to within just inches in front of the lens.'

    I have the 16-35 and love it. With the VRII I get way more light options than I would with the difference between f/4 and f/2.8. I like that I can use a filter for protection.

  5. No doubt the 14-24 is a wonderful lens.

    I find the 16-35 VRII to be excellent. The ACR Lens Profile is very good. It seems to handle flare a bit better than the three other wide zoom lenses I've owned. On the D700, it's purple fringing artifacts are the lowest I've seen. I use the lens mostly at 20mm.

    Technically, the ACR Lens Profile doesn't handle barrel distortion well below 20mm. The primary weakness of the 16-35 is the barrel distortion has high-order components below 20 mm. In fact, I think the lens is borders on unusable at 16 mm.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

magnifiercrossmenucross-circle