PFRE is the original online resource for real estate and interior photographers. Since 2006, it has been a community hub where like-minded professionals from around the world gather to share information with a common goal of improving their work and advancing their business. With thousands of articles, covering hundreds of topics, PFRE offers the most robust collection of educational material in our field. The history of real estate photography has been documented within these pages.
All Articles


The Render Flames tool in Photoshop is a very powerful and dynamic tool that lets you add fire in just a few steps where there otherwise wasn't one in your photo. In this video, I demonstrate step by step how you can have Photoshop render a fire into a ...



The PFRE Community Forum is an online resource for discussing the art and business of Real Estate and Interior Photography.
Join The Discussion


View Now


For over a decade, photographers from around the world have participated in PFRE’s monthly photography contests, culminating in the year-end crowning of PFRE’s Photographer of the Year. With a new theme each month and commentary offered by some of the finest real estate & interior photographers anywhere, these contests offer a fun, competitive environment with rich learning opportunities. 

Contest Rules


View / Submit


View Archive


PFRE’s Annual Conference in Las Vegas provides real estate and interior photographers from around the world an opportunity to meet on an annual basis, to learn, share best practices and make connections. Many of the leading names in our field are selected to speak on topics aimed at improving our craft and advancing our business. It’s a comfortable, relaxed environment that is fun, easy to get to, and affordable.


PFRE Conference 2020

Registration not open yet
App Store

Latest News

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 2 of 2

*Early bird tickets go on sale September 28th* Here are the remaining ...

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 1 of 2

We're a few short months away from the PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 an ...

Reader Poll: Which Topics Should Be Covered at the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference?

Planning is well underway for the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference and we' ...

PFRE Conference 2020 Announcement

As many of you know, last year we hosted the first-ever PFRE Conferenc ...



The PFRE podcast is focused on having meaningful conversations with world-class photographers, business professionals and industry leaders, with the goal to inform and inspire.
All Podcasts

Coming Soon...



PFRE prides itself on the depth and breadth of the information and professional development resources it makes available to our community. Our goal is to help real estate and interior photographers be successful while bringing the community together and elevating the industry as a whole.


Coming Soon...

Alternative To The Top Nikon and Canon Ultra-wides

Published: 27/06/2011
By: larry

Peter Brandt posed a question last week about the Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 FX wide angle lens. Peter's question was, "wouldn't the Tokina 16-28 be a better lens than the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G ED AF-S?" Peter points out that the Tokina 16-28 is less than half the price of the Nikon 14-24mm and for interiors you really don't need the range below 16mm that much. By the way, Peter's question also applies to the Canon world if you compare the Tokina 16-28mm to the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II .

It's worth noting that the Tokina 16-28mm is designed for full frame cameras. That's what the FX designation stands for.

Ken Rockwell has reviewed the Tokina 16-28 and here's a summary of Ken's findings:

  1. The optical quality of the Tokina 16-28 is as good as the Nikon 14-24mm and the Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L II.
  2. Nikon owners considering a top end wide angle lens should also consider the Nikon 16-35mm f/4G ED VR II AF-S IF. Ken likes it better than the Nikon 14-24mm because you can use filters on the Nikon 16-35 and not on the Nikon 14-24.
  3. You can't use filters on the Tokina 16-28 or the Nikon 14-24mm.
  4. The lens cap that comes on the Tokina is not effective, Ken recommends an alternative.
  5. The Tokina weighs less than the Nikon 14-24mm but more than the Canon 16-35mm.

Conclusion: What it boils down to is how important using filters on your ultra-wide lens is to you and how sensitive you are to lens weight. I think Peter is right, the Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 FX is a pretty good alternative to the top Nikon and Canon ultra-wides.

Update 6/30/2011: As David points out below Ken Rockwell's comparison is not super rigorous. In the comments below there are other reviews that agree with Ken's review but it is not conclusive that the Tokina is as good as the Nikon 14-24mm or the Canon 16-35mm. We would welcome input from anyone that has had a chance to compare the Tokina 16-28mm to the top Nikon and Canon Ultra-wides.

7 comments on “Alternative To The Top Nikon and Canon Ultra-wides”

  1. In my experience and personal opinion photograph first is skill, second glass, third camera body.

    Purchasing a brand camera body and then slapping some generic lens on it forgoes all the research and art of optics by the genuine creators who optimize these lenses to perform with their native bodies. If one was to decide what to invest in to save money, glass or camera body, go with a lesser body, but get good glass. Especially in real estate photography where high iso performance is usually not as imperative as say in documentary field. In the end, you'll always get what you pay for.

  2. p.s. there are some third party filter systems for these types of lenses such as Lee filter BF holder
    they're generally targeted towards landscape photographers

  3. Peter Brandt says: Bought the lens after reading the review links. I like it so far !
    The kicker was that the lens is as sharp as the Nikkor 14-24mm f2.8. With the spare cash I'll buy a tele extender for my Nikkor 300mm f2.8.

  4. I don't pay much attention to Ken Rockwell. As far as I can tell, he is not a professional photographer and does not subject the equipment to rigorous testing.

  5. Here is another test/review: This one seems more in depth and technical. Sharpness fall off and more noticeable vignetting at the corners wide-open is hardly surprising, even for top quality lenses, especially zooms, so I would not hold that against it. Note the quality control issues though. However, I am not sure Canon's quality control of its wideangle zooms is that great either.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *