PFRE is the original online resource for real estate and interior photographers. Since 2006, it has been a community hub where like-minded professionals from around the world gather to share information with a common goal of improving their work and advancing their business. With thousands of articles, covering hundreds of topics, PFRE offers the most robust collection of educational material in our field. The history of real estate photography has been documented within these pages.
All Articles


While we can discuss how to capture it, the fact remains that the front exterior photo is THE most important photo in real estate marketing. It's my understanding that, before the advent of online listings, agents were only required to choose one photo ...



The PFRE Community Forum is an online resource for discussing the art and business of Real Estate and Interior Photography.
Join The Discussion


View Now


For over a decade, photographers from around the world have participated in PFRE’s monthly photography contests, culminating in the year-end crowning of PFRE’s Photographer of the Year. With a new theme each month and commentary offered by some of the finest real estate & interior photographers anywhere, these contests offer a fun, competitive environment with rich learning opportunities. 

Contest Rules


View / Submit


View Archive


PFRE’s Annual Conference in Las Vegas provides real estate and interior photographers from around the world an opportunity to meet on an annual basis, to learn, share best practices and make connections. Many of the leading names in our field are selected to speak on topics aimed at improving our craft and advancing our business. It’s a comfortable, relaxed environment that is fun, easy to get to, and affordable.


PFRE Conference 2020

Register Now

Latest News

Limited Early Bird Spots on Sale Now! PFRE Virtual Conference 2020

The roster of presenters is full, and the PFRE Virtual Conference is o ...

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 2 of 2

*Early bird tickets go on sale September 28th* Here are the remaining ...

PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 Announcement: Presenter Line Up Part 1 of 2

We're a few short months away from the PFRE Virtual Conference 2020 an ...

Reader Poll: Which Topics Should Be Covered at the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference?

Planning is well underway for the 2020 PFRE Virtual Conference and we' ...



The PFRE podcast is focused on having meaningful conversations with world-class photographers, business professionals and industry leaders, with the goal to inform and inspire.
All Podcasts

Coming Soon...



PFRE prides itself on the depth and breadth of the information and professional development resources it makes available to our community. Our goal is to help real estate and interior photographers be successful while bringing the community together and elevating the industry as a whole.


Coming Soon...

Adobe Photoshop Photography Program Pricing - Scott Kelby's Take

Published: 16/09/2013
By: larry

adobedeal2Ever since Adobe announced Creative Cloud and the move to subscription pricing of most of their applications I've been a little cranky because I've been an Adobe customer since 1990 and I just don't like the subscription software model and Adobe's pricing up to now has felt like too much for what I'm going to get with Creative Cloud.

Rick, a PFRE reader pointed out the new limited time pricing that Adobe announced at Photoshop World last week. After reading Scott Kelby's take on the announcement I have to say it the pricing sounds much better for what you get. I still don't like the concept of subscription software, but this pricing is tolerable and is closer to what I paid for updates every year or two. I think Kelby is right, this offer is much better than anyone expected from Adobe, it is explicitly aimed at photographers. I think Scott's post does a much better job describing the product than the Adobe page does. Adobe is pretty damn lucky to have Scott Kelby promoting their products, he does a much better job marketing than Adobe does!

I think I'll sign up for this version of Creative Cloud. You have to already have PS CS3 or later and subscribe before December 31, 2013, but it effectively lasts forever... well they will probably increase it some time. Nothing is forever.

4 comments on “Adobe Photoshop Photography Program Pricing - Scott Kelby's Take”

  1. I'm an amateur who just bought PS Elements and haven't even actually used it yet. (I'm looking for tutorials to get started.) I'm confused by all the Photoshop news and the related controversy. Will I be able to use Elements without subscribing? Do I need Lightroom? Will I have to pay $10 or $20/month? Thanks for any guidance.

  2. @Richard- PS elements is a simplified version of Photoshop. You'll probably always be able to get PS Elements and Lightroom without a subscription. I my opinion every serious photographer needs Lightroom. I think Lightroom is more important for a photographer than PS Elements.

    For real estate work there are a few things that you can't do with LR, like sky replacement and quickly removing objects but 95% of real estate photography can be done with LR.

  3. @ Richard - PS Elements is actually NOT a simplified version of Photoshop. It is a separate program that offers similar features to those in Phtooshop and some other features not available in Photoshop. It has a decidedly different user interface and a dumbed down version of Adobe Camera RAW. It runs significantly slower than Photoshop. It is not (in it's current form) Photoshop Lite. It does not prepare you to use the interface in Photoshop or to use many of Photoshop's more advanced tools. Perhaps most significantly, except for the dumbed down Adobe Camera Raw, you are locked into an 8 bit workflow for almost everything. At times this can make a real difference. It's ability to edit large numbers of photos efficiently (time-wise) make's it an unwise choice in most professional settings

    However, Elements may just right for you, as an amateur or casual user. It is, in its own right, quite a powerful program and represents good value. However it does have significant limitations for working professionals. This is a partial list from the Adobe Site

    >Adobe Camera Raw differences between Photoshop and Photoshop Elements

    >Photoshop Elements comes with a database driven Digital Asset Management application called Elements Organizer. Photoshop comes with Bridge, a file navigation system that operates much like Windows Explorer or Macintosh Finder.

    >While there are several functions that both Organizer and Bridge use, they are fundamentally different applications and serve different purposes.

    >Photoshop Elements does not support the following color modes: Duotone, CMYK, Lab, Multichannel

    >There is very little 16-bit support in Photshop Elements. You cannot create or convert an image to 16-bit, only open images that are already 16-bit. While working with a 16-bit image you cannot work with layers. The following tools do not work: Magic Wand, Selection Brush, the family of Type tools, Recompose, Cookie Cutter, Straighten, the brush based tools (Paint Brush, Eraser, Dodge, Blur, etc), or the shape based tools (Rectangle, Ellipse, Custom Shape, etc).
    >Many filters do not work, mainly those featured in the Filter Gallery.

    >Photoshop Elements does not fully support Smart Objects. While you can open files that already have Smart Object layers, you cannot create Smart Objects nor open the files embedded as Smart Objects.

    >Photoshop Elements does not have a Channels panel. Nor does it have the Channel Mixer Adjustment/Enhancement.

    >Photoshop Elements cannot merge multiple/bracketed photo exposures into an HDR image. There is no support for 32-bit images. However, Photoshop Elements does offer Photomerge Exposure as a similar function.

    >Photoshop Elements does not use the same range of Content-Aware functions. While the Spot Healing Brush includes the Content-Aware option in both applications, Photoshop Elements does not have Conent-Aware as an option in the Edit > Fill Layer command (known simply as Edit > Fill in Photoshop). However, Photoshop Elements does use a Content-Aware Fill option when creating a Photomerge Panorama, this is not an option in Photoshop. Photoshop CS6 introduced the Content-Aware Extend and Move tools, which are not available in Photoshop Elements.

    >Photoshop Elements has fewer vector based tools. The Pen family of tools are not available. The Shape tools do create a vector shape layer, but the vector points cannot be edited individually. There is no Paths panel.

    >The licence from a boxed purchase of Photoshop Elements is multi-platform (as of version 9). This means you can install on either Windows or Macintosh or both without having to purchase a separate version. This is not true with Photoshop.

    >Photoshop Elements does not have the Subtract or Divide blending modes that were introduced in Photoshop CS5.

    >Photoshop and Photoshop Elements can both Transform selected pixels in the following ways: Scale, Rotate, Skew, Distort, and Perspective. Photoshop Elements does not have the Warp Transform option.

    >The Photoshop Elements Color Picker does not include the following options available in Photoshop's Color Picker: the Not a web-safe color alert icon, the Add to Swatches and Color Libraries buttons, and the Lab and CMYK models.
    Photoshop Extended CS6 has the following panels that Photoshop Elements 11 does not: 3D*, Brush, Brush Presets, Channels, Character, Character Styles, Clone Source, Color, Layer Comps, Measurement Log*, Notes, Paragraph, Paragraph Styles, Paths, Properties, Styles, Timeline, and Tool Presets.

    >Photoshop Elements does not support Extensions such as Mini Bridge and Kuler.

    And to answer your specific question-No, Elements is not part of the Creative Cloud subscription service and likely will never be (but who knows with Adobe?). If you are an aspiring professional, you would do better to invest in and learn Lightroom. Lightroom (as Larry points out) is also available outside the current Adobe Creative Cloud scheme.

  4. Of course they will increase the price once they've got everyone sucked into the subscription model. This price sounds good for some, but it's useless if you are just starting you career as a photographer since you aren't eligible without a previous copy of CS, or alternatively you are one of the vast numbers of people who use photoshop but don't live in the US. This is just a ploy to reduce resistance and suck everyone in to renting software. The ethics behind these sorts of moves are highly questionable in my opinion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *