<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Photography For Real Estate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:10:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nikon Announces A Serious Competitor To The 5DMKII by Jason Lusk</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2012/02/10/nikon-announces-a-serious-competitor-to-the-5dmkii/comment-page-1/#comment-57581</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Lusk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=10228#comment-57581</guid>
		<description>Uneducated real estate agents will be impressed with you telling them you can shoot their homes with 36 mega pixel shots - though it is overkill for most situations. Looks like an upgrade to the D800 or a similar camera that Canon will release will require a upgrade to my hardware as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uneducated real estate agents will be impressed with you telling them you can shoot their homes with 36 mega pixel shots &#8211; though it is overkill for most situations. Looks like an upgrade to the D800 or a similar camera that Canon will release will require a upgrade to my hardware as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another Stunning Video By Michael Pelzer of Uneek Luxury Tours by Chris</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2012/02/08/another-stunning-video-by-michael-pelzer-of-uneek-luxury-tours/comment-page-1/#comment-57579</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=10209#comment-57579</guid>
		<description>@Michael Yearout

This isnt meant to be rude, but In the end why would Michael from uneekluxurytours care what you (or anyone else) thinks?  There is only ONE person who matters and that is his client....period. 

Considering the amount of time that was spent on this video, I am sure this builder wanted EXACTLY what was filmed and it was done very well.  I honestly dont think any other style of video could have showcased the house as well as Michael did.

If this style of video is bringing in business for Michael then that is all that matters.

I always find it funny when people comment that  there are too many &quot;this&quot; or not enough of &quot;that without having a clue as to what the actual client wanted.  If the client asks for something...you do it.  Im not sure how you think you can run a business any other way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael Yearout</p>
<p>This isnt meant to be rude, but In the end why would Michael from uneekluxurytours care what you (or anyone else) thinks?  There is only ONE person who matters and that is his client&#8230;.period. </p>
<p>Considering the amount of time that was spent on this video, I am sure this builder wanted EXACTLY what was filmed and it was done very well.  I honestly dont think any other style of video could have showcased the house as well as Michael did.</p>
<p>If this style of video is bringing in business for Michael then that is all that matters.</p>
<p>I always find it funny when people comment that  there are too many &#8220;this&#8221; or not enough of &#8220;that without having a clue as to what the actual client wanted.  If the client asks for something&#8230;you do it.  Im not sure how you think you can run a business any other way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nikon Announces A Serious Competitor To The 5DMKII by Patrick</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2012/02/10/nikon-announces-a-serious-competitor-to-the-5dmkii/comment-page-1/#comment-57550</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=10228#comment-57550</guid>
		<description>Dynamic Range... Anyone know what the impact or meaning of the &quot;91,000-pixel RGB sensor&quot; is... I know in medium format cameras the dynamic range is wider... on my D3X I think it&#039;s a 1,005-pixel sensor... so on the D800 will the dynamic range be better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dynamic Range&#8230; Anyone know what the impact or meaning of the &#8220;91,000-pixel RGB sensor&#8221; is&#8230; I know in medium format cameras the dynamic range is wider&#8230; on my D3X I think it&#8217;s a 1,005-pixel sensor&#8230; so on the D800 will the dynamic range be better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nikon Announces A Serious Competitor To The 5DMKII by larry</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2012/02/10/nikon-announces-a-serious-competitor-to-the-5dmkii/comment-page-1/#comment-57536</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=10228#comment-57536</guid>
		<description>@Anne- Yes, I immediately thought of that too! I find 21 megapixels from my 5DM2 a bit of a nuisance... can&#039;t imagine 36.

Thank&#039;s for pointing out my error on Reverie... now that you point it out I recall Vincent&#039;s comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anne- Yes, I immediately thought of that too! I find 21 megapixels from my 5DM2 a bit of a nuisance&#8230; can&#8217;t imagine 36.</p>
<p>Thank&#8217;s for pointing out my error on Reverie&#8230; now that you point it out I recall Vincent&#8217;s comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nikon Announces A Serious Competitor To The 5DMKII by KH</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2012/02/10/nikon-announces-a-serious-competitor-to-the-5dmkii/comment-page-1/#comment-57529</link>
		<dc:creator>KH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=10228#comment-57529</guid>
		<description>There are some cool things about it, i don&#039;t know if would use the video anyways, but the idea of 36 meg files for shooting re photos.. I know 5D shooters are close to that now.. but that is a whole lot of files to download and store... maybe wait for good prices on a gently used D700 instead</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some cool things about it, i don&#8217;t know if would use the video anyways, but the idea of 36 meg files for shooting re photos.. I know 5D shooters are close to that now.. but that is a whole lot of files to download and store&#8230; maybe wait for good prices on a gently used D700 instead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nikon Announces A Serious Competitor To The 5DMKII by Anne On Ymous</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2012/02/10/nikon-announces-a-serious-competitor-to-the-5dmkii/comment-page-1/#comment-57523</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne On Ymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=10228#comment-57523</guid>
		<description>I ordered one the night it was released but I can&#039;t imagine using it for general real estate photography. I think a lot of people who are excited about the 36 megapixels just don&#039;t realize how large a cumbersome such a file is to work with. The video will be great though.

An interesting aside worth mentioning:  Canon did not hire Vincent LaForet to shoot Reverie. He funded the project himself and begged Canon to let him borrow the 5DmkII over a weekend because he saw what a groundbreaking product it was. At the time Canon had no clue as to the potential of what they had made...

http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2008/09/20/something-very-interesting-is-comingboth-to-this-blog-and-to-our-industry/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ordered one the night it was released but I can&#8217;t imagine using it for general real estate photography. I think a lot of people who are excited about the 36 megapixels just don&#8217;t realize how large a cumbersome such a file is to work with. The video will be great though.</p>
<p>An interesting aside worth mentioning:  Canon did not hire Vincent LaForet to shoot Reverie. He funded the project himself and begged Canon to let him borrow the 5DmkII over a weekend because he saw what a groundbreaking product it was. At the time Canon had no clue as to the potential of what they had made&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2008/09/20/something-very-interesting-is-comingboth-to-this-blog-and-to-our-industry/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2008/09/20/something-very-interesting-is-comingboth-to-this-blog-and-to-our-industry/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nikon Announces A Serious Competitor To The 5DMKII by David Lenhert</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2012/02/10/nikon-announces-a-serious-competitor-to-the-5dmkii/comment-page-1/#comment-57508</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lenhert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=10228#comment-57508</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait!  I placed my order the day it was announced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait!  I placed my order the day it was announced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Real Estate Prices Continue To Drop But This Isn&#8217;t A Negative For The Real Estate Photography Business by Charlie Dresen @ Steamboat Springs Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2012/02/05/real-estate-prices-continue-to-drop-but-this-isnt-a-negative-for-the-real-estate-photography-business/comment-page-1/#comment-57504</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Dresen @ Steamboat Springs Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=10159#comment-57504</guid>
		<description>Here you go:  http://www.brickroadvisuals.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=27:real-estate-photography-statistics&amp;catid=2:photography&amp;Itemid=3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here you go:  <a href="http://www.brickroadvisuals.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=27:real-estate-photography-statistics&#038;catid=2:photography&#038;Itemid=3" rel="nofollow">http://www.brickroadvisuals.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=27:real-estate-photography-statistics&#038;catid=2:photography&#038;Itemid=3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe Listened To User Feedback Regarding Their CS6 Upgrade Policy by doug stroud</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2012/02/02/adobe-listened-to-user-feedback-regarding-their-cs6-upgrade-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-57472</link>
		<dc:creator>doug stroud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=10149#comment-57472</guid>
		<description>This is a slightly different perspective on the cost of purchasing a product that is controlled by the seller.

There are a great number of independent small businesses using/rely on Photoshop that are made up of one person, (I venture not to guess for being grossly incorrect- maybe a gazillion?!, but whatever it is- it is a LOT); photographers, graphic designers, artists, painters, and many others that I am not aware of in the professional field. Then you have businesses that range from 2 upward with much bigger revenue streams and I dare say way more lucrative. I understand licensing, so I am not speaking about multiple users using the same copy but multiple people supporting the single license; e.g. the print shop with the graphic designer, the sales person, the printer effectively lowers the cost of said purchase. It would be very interesting to see just how many one-person businesses use Photoshop compared to everything larger in Photoshop&#039;s portfolio. Photoshop for the one-person outfit might be a 20% expense on their balance sheet while a larger outfit&#039;s cost ratio drops proportionately, scalability is a key element that is not considered in the pricing by Adobe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a slightly different perspective on the cost of purchasing a product that is controlled by the seller.</p>
<p>There are a great number of independent small businesses using/rely on Photoshop that are made up of one person, (I venture not to guess for being grossly incorrect- maybe a gazillion?!, but whatever it is- it is a LOT); photographers, graphic designers, artists, painters, and many others that I am not aware of in the professional field. Then you have businesses that range from 2 upward with much bigger revenue streams and I dare say way more lucrative. I understand licensing, so I am not speaking about multiple users using the same copy but multiple people supporting the single license; e.g. the print shop with the graphic designer, the sales person, the printer effectively lowers the cost of said purchase. It would be very interesting to see just how many one-person businesses use Photoshop compared to everything larger in Photoshop&#8217;s portfolio. Photoshop for the one-person outfit might be a 20% expense on their balance sheet while a larger outfit&#8217;s cost ratio drops proportionately, scalability is a key element that is not considered in the pricing by Adobe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another Stunning Video By Michael Pelzer of Uneek Luxury Tours by Steve</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2012/02/08/another-stunning-video-by-michael-pelzer-of-uneek-luxury-tours/comment-page-1/#comment-57413</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=10209#comment-57413</guid>
		<description>...ok now I can view it thanks....


Wow...shot with precision....nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;ok now I can view it thanks&#8230;.</p>
<p>Wow&#8230;shot with precision&#8230;.nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

