<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Photography For Real Estate &#187; Workflow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/category/workflow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:11:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Preview of Lens Correction Solution for Camera Raw 6 and Lightroom 3</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/05/03/preview-of-lens-correction-solution-for-camera-raw-6-and-lightroom-3/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/05/03/preview-of-lens-correction-solution-for-camera-raw-6-and-lightroom-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 02:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=4766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a subject that should pique the intrest of all real estate photographers! See Tom Hogarty&#8217;s post on this subject here.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/05/03/preview-of-lens-correction-solution-for-camera-raw-6-and-lightroom-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aperture vs Lightroom- Is There a Best Choice For Real Estate Photography?</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/02/21/aperture-vs-lightroom-is-there-a-best-choice-for-real-estate-photography/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/02/21/aperture-vs-lightroom-is-there-a-best-choice-for-real-estate-photography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aperture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=4207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple&#8217;s recent release of Aperture 3.0 highlight&#8217;s the fact that photographers that are Mac users are faced with a choice of do they use Adobe Lightroom or Aperture for digital asset and workflow management. I want to disclose right up front that I am a Mac user and I use Lightroom extensively and Aperture only [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/02/21/aperture-vs-lightroom-is-there-a-best-choice-for-real-estate-photography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pogoplug: A Fantastic Real Estate Photographer Photo Delivery System</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/01/26/pogoplug-a-fantastic-real-estate-photographer-photo-delivery-system/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/01/26/pogoplug-a-fantastic-real-estate-photographer-photo-delivery-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business of real estate photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=3986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been a enthusiastic DropBox user for some time and have been getting comfortable with the convenience of having important files accessible via a special drive in &#8220;the cloud&#8221;. In a previous post, I described how to use DropBox for photo delivery. After seeing Leo Laporte&#8217;s coverage of some of the new products this year at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/01/26/pogoplug-a-fantastic-real-estate-photographer-photo-delivery-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DXO Optics Pro 5.3 &#8211; Is It Worth The Price?</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/11/12/dxo-optics-pro-53-is-it-worth-the-price/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/11/12/dxo-optics-pro-53-is-it-worth-the-price/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/11/12/dxo-optics-pro-53-is-it-worth-the-price/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am taking another look at DXO Optics Pro because DXO recently did a release and a e-book subscriber suggested that I give DXO coverage in my book. I have to say up front that I&#8217;ve had some resistance in the past to using DXO in the past because: They charge twice as much ($249 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/11/12/dxo-optics-pro-53-is-it-worth-the-price/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Basic Real Estate Photography Shooting and Workflow</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/07/30/basic-real-estate-photography-shooting-and-workflow/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/07/30/basic-real-estate-photography-shooting-and-workflow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/07/30/basic-real-estate-photography-shooting-and-workflow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is for Enkay, a reader that asked me to go through  basic shooting considerations and post processing workflow. Great idea, I written about shooting and workflow for a while. Here are the things I do when shooting: Keep in mind the results you want. Things like, how many finished photos do you need? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/07/30/basic-real-estate-photography-shooting-and-workflow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lightroom 1.3 Update Feature/Problem Summary</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/26/lightroom-13-update-featureproblem-summary/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/26/lightroom-13-update-featureproblem-summary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was glad to get the Lightroom 1.3 update just for the fixes it had to Leopard on the Mac platform. However, the Lightroom 1.3 update had a good deal more than just fixes so it would behave well on Leopard. Martin Evening over at Light Room News has a couple of posts in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/26/lightroom-13-update-featureproblem-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do We Have Any Aperture Users Here?</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/25/do-we-have-any-aperture-users-here/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/25/do-we-have-any-aperture-users-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photo Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jerry Swanson of Eagan, MN says: &#8220;&#8230; use the Canon 1Ds with Aperture. After ten months I still have not learned all the features. The Apple Store has experts to teach the program but one hour a week is not great. &#8230;I have been using Aperture and have found this a long learning experience.&#8221; Is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/25/do-we-have-any-aperture-users-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharpening in Real Estate Photography Workflow</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/01/sharpening-in-real-estate-photography-workflow/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/01/sharpening-in-real-estate-photography-workflow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently a reader asked me if every image needed sharpening. The answer is yes when you are downsizing images for web use like real estate photographers do all the time, sharpening is necessary for every image. About the same time I was reading an excellent article in Photoshop User Magazine called Pro Sharpening Workflow in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/01/sharpening-in-real-estate-photography-workflow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lightroom 1.1 Moves Closer to Being The Only Photo Editor You Need</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/06/28/lightroom-11-moves-closer-to-being-the-only-photo-editor-you-need/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/06/28/lightroom-11-moves-closer-to-being-the-only-photo-editor-you-need/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you already own Lightroom and have used it in the last few days it will have automatically asked to be updated to version 1.1. Version 1.1 is free and has some pretty nice features. The two I like the best are sharpening, noise removal and clarity. Uwe Steinmueller over at outbackphoto.com has one of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/06/28/lightroom-11-moves-closer-to-being-the-only-photo-editor-you-need/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Estate Photography Workflow</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/31/real-estate-photography-workflow/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/31/real-estate-photography-workflow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 18:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Raye Bellinger of Sacramento asks: &#8220;Would you mind exploring workflow as it applies to the busy professional. Lightroom is nice but other programs like ACDSee Pro are more functional and much faster with RAW files. I would particularly like to see what the well established real estate photographers are using to speed workflow&#8221; Well I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/31/real-estate-photography-workflow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

