<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Photography For Real Estate &#187; Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/category/legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:11:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are You Giving Your Photo Rights Away?</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2011/07/06/are-you-giving-your-photo-rights-away/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2011/07/06/are-you-giving-your-photo-rights-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 03:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=8245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone is stoked about Google+ and it looks like it has some very cool features. But, Scott Bourne, over at photofocus.com, has a great article that professional photographers should read before posting photos on Google or FaceBook. Were you aware that when you post photos on Google and FaceBook you are granting them rights to pretty much [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2011/07/06/are-you-giving-your-photo-rights-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ethics Considerations In Real Estate Photography</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2011/02/14/ethics-considerations-in-real-estate-photography/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2011/02/14/ethics-considerations-in-real-estate-photography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 03:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business of real estate photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=6842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the years we&#8217;ve had a lot of heated discussions here about ethics of image modification in the context of real estate photography.  I think the subject is important enough that I have a separate page dedicated to summarizing the consensus that has evolved out of these discussions over the years. Here is a general outline [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2011/02/14/ethics-considerations-in-real-estate-photography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Scrape Maps From Google Maps or Google Earth</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/08/11/dont-scrape-maps-from-google-maps-or-google-earth/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/08/11/dont-scrape-maps-from-google-maps-or-google-earth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 04:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=5365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iran Watson started a thread in the PFRE flickr group about shooting acreage so I jumped in and described how on a large land listing we had I had used Photoshop to make a put a transparent surveyors map layer over a Google satellite map layer so that buyers could see the vegetation, the streets and how the newly subdivided [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/08/11/dont-scrape-maps-from-google-maps-or-google-earth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Can Stand Up To Unauthorized Use Of Your Images</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/08/19/you-can-stand-up-to-unauthorized-use-of-your-images/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/08/19/you-can-stand-up-to-unauthorized-use-of-your-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=2652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Scott for pointing out a great story of how you can stand up to unauthorized uses of your images without spending big money on legal support. Here is the story in the words of the photographer Christopher Boffoli. And here is Carolyn Wright&#8217;s legal analysis.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/08/19/you-can-stand-up-to-unauthorized-use-of-your-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Code of Ethics For Real Estate Photographers</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/07/15/code-of-ethics-for-real-estate-photographers/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/07/15/code-of-ethics-for-real-estate-photographers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFRE Idol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Editing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=2379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While cleaning up the blog I ran across the summary of a series of posts and discussions from two years ago on the subject of ethics. Two years ago this was a fairly heated discussion with opinions all over the map so what I did was attempt to summarize the general consensus of how readers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/07/15/code-of-ethics-for-real-estate-photographers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interior Photographer Wins $12M Verdict!</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/25/interior-photographer-wins-12m-verdict/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/25/interior-photographer-wins-12m-verdict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/25/interior-photographer-wins-12m-verdict/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via: Thomas Bliss&#8217;s IAAP site and Carolyn Wright&#8217;s Photo Attorney blog: &#8220;Liz Ordonez-Dawes, an accomplished architectural and interior design photographer, recently was awarded more than $12 million dollars for copyright infringement of seven photographs. In brief, the court found that the defendants distributed Ms. Ordonez-Dawes&#8217; photos of high-end houses to various third parties for advertisements [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/25/interior-photographer-wins-12m-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Petition Against Orphan Works Legislation</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/19/petition-against-orphan-works-legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/19/petition-against-orphan-works-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/19/petition-against-orphan-works-legislation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About a month ago I did a post highlighting some background on the The Shawn Bentley Orphan Works Act of 2008 legislation pending in the house and senate. Thanks to Carolyn Wright over at photoattorney.com I just noticed that there is a petition to sign registering sentiment against this legislation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/19/petition-against-orphan-works-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed Orphan Works Bills Will Radically Change Copyright</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/05/30/proposed-orphan-works-bills-will-radically-change-copyright/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/05/30/proposed-orphan-works-bills-will-radically-change-copyright/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 21:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/05/30/proposed-orphan-works-bills-will-radically-change-copyright/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven&#8217;t noticed Congress is on it&#8217;s way to passing some legislation that will radically change the way copyright law works. Photographers owning copyrighted material will be effected by these laws if passed. I suggest taking the time to understand what is about to happen with copyright and if you don&#8217;t like it, express [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/05/30/proposed-orphan-works-bills-will-radically-change-copyright/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Your Photo Licensing Consistent With Your Local MLS?</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/29/is-your-photo-licensing-consistent-with-your-local-mls/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/29/is-your-photo-licensing-consistent-with-your-local-mls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 05:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/29/is-your-photo-licensing-consistent-with-your-local-mls/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After participating in a number of discussions about photo licensing with real estate photographers I&#8217;ve realized that there is a disconnect going on between real estate photographers licensing and MLS photo usage rules. Here&#8217;s what I think is happening. Real estate photographers are coming up with their photo licensing without knowing what the local MLS [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/29/is-your-photo-licensing-consistent-with-your-local-mls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strategies to Stay Within the Law When Editing Digital Photos</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/08/13/strategies-to-stay-within-the-law-when-editing-digital-photos/</link>
		<comments>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/08/13/strategies-to-stay-within-the-law-when-editing-digital-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Editing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hesitate to do another post on photo editing ethics again since we have pretty much beat this subject to death in the recent past. However, the Real Estate Trends + Technology Magazine of the California Association of Realtors have a pretty definitive article by John Edwards, titled Have you crossed the line? I think [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/08/13/strategies-to-stay-within-the-law-when-editing-digital-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

