<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Negotiating Agency Shooting Contracts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/03/08/negotiating-agency-shooting-contracts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/03/08/negotiating-agency-shooting-contracts/</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:09:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilles Brunet</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/03/08/negotiating-agency-shooting-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-25743</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilles Brunet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=4346#comment-25743</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, having only one big client might be risky. 

Thanks for the post.
Gilles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, having only one big client might be risky. </p>
<p>Thanks for the post.<br />
Gilles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/03/08/negotiating-agency-shooting-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-25721</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=4346#comment-25721</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d caution against the really large brokerages -- if the volumes are too high, you are putting all your eggs in one basket. If they go belly up, or simply change their photography policy, you have a major problem. And if they monopolize your time, you become effectively an employee, but without even the semblance of job security, and of course zero benefits. A better course is to have several small-to-medium-sized offices. Then if you lose one, it&#039;s not such a disaster. Also, with the medium-sized clients, the volumes aren&#039;t so great as to pressure your rates too far down. Best of both worlds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d caution against the really large brokerages &#8212; if the volumes are too high, you are putting all your eggs in one basket. If they go belly up, or simply change their photography policy, you have a major problem. And if they monopolize your time, you become effectively an employee, but without even the semblance of job security, and of course zero benefits. A better course is to have several small-to-medium-sized offices. Then if you lose one, it&#8217;s not such a disaster. Also, with the medium-sized clients, the volumes aren&#8217;t so great as to pressure your rates too far down. Best of both worlds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Salgado</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/03/08/negotiating-agency-shooting-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-25692</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Salgado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=4346#comment-25692</guid>
		<description>I would also suggest that large acreage properties with multiple structures fall into the estate category, regardless how big the home is.

It would be interesting to see a range of Thomas&#039;s pricing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also suggest that large acreage properties with multiple structures fall into the estate category, regardless how big the home is.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to see a range of Thomas&#8217;s pricing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

