<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HDR Studio by Unifiedcolor Announces A Mac Version</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/02/07/hdr-studio-by-unifiedcolor-announces-a-mac-version/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/02/07/hdr-studio-by-unifiedcolor-announces-a-mac-version/</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:02:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Gibson</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/02/07/hdr-studio-by-unifiedcolor-announces-a-mac-version/comment-page-1/#comment-25214</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=4139#comment-25214</guid>
		<description>After buying Photomatix Pro literally the day before this post, and not being happy with the muddiness of its processed images, I read the post, and decided to give the free trial of HDR Studio (for Mac) a try. I am so confused, even after reading their tutorial, and watching their tutorial videos, I still can&#039;t get images to look anywhere near as good as those made with Photomatix (they are much more muddy).   

In using 5-7 RAW images of a living room with a view of gardens, Photomatix gives a relatively good inital (processed) image, albeit muddy, while in HDR Studio, I couldn&#039;t even get the initial (processed) image to show both inside and the view out the window (the view of outside was blown out), until after playing around with sliders in many different categories, I finally got both interior &amp; exterior to show up, but now the interior is completely muddy, much worse than Photomatix. I almost feel that there seems to be a step missing (or I am missing a step): In Photomatix Pro, there are just 2 steps until you get the preliminary image (1. Generate HDF Image, then 2. Tone Mapping, then you have a decent (ie. I can see inside &amp; outside) image to start working on. In HDR Studio, after the Merge to HDR step, you are presented with the image, and it feels like there should be a second step (the equivalent step to Photomatix&#039;s &quot;Tone Mapping&quot; (automatic) step), but there isn&#039;t, you are left to playing with all the sliders now. 

Also, HDR Studio (for Mac) is extremely slow, compared to Photomatix Pro (Mac). It took 5-7 min. to process 6-7 RAW images (~12-14MB each). Have they slowed the free trial version down, or is there a bug in their new software, or...? (I have a 2GHz Duo MacBook, which fits their requirement.) 

Larry,
Do you have some settings (particularly in the Brightness/Contrast, Highlight/Shadow, and WhiteBalance settings), that I maybe just completely off on (particularly for house interior images with views out the windows)? 

Blayne,
Great blog, great images, and great testing of the 2 different software! Do you have any special settings (or any HDR Studios &quot; recipes&quot;, as  they call them) you can recommend 

Thanks for any info, tips, 
Luke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After buying Photomatix Pro literally the day before this post, and not being happy with the muddiness of its processed images, I read the post, and decided to give the free trial of HDR Studio (for Mac) a try. I am so confused, even after reading their tutorial, and watching their tutorial videos, I still can&#8217;t get images to look anywhere near as good as those made with Photomatix (they are much more muddy).   </p>
<p>In using 5-7 RAW images of a living room with a view of gardens, Photomatix gives a relatively good inital (processed) image, albeit muddy, while in HDR Studio, I couldn&#8217;t even get the initial (processed) image to show both inside and the view out the window (the view of outside was blown out), until after playing around with sliders in many different categories, I finally got both interior &amp; exterior to show up, but now the interior is completely muddy, much worse than Photomatix. I almost feel that there seems to be a step missing (or I am missing a step): In Photomatix Pro, there are just 2 steps until you get the preliminary image (1. Generate HDF Image, then 2. Tone Mapping, then you have a decent (ie. I can see inside &amp; outside) image to start working on. In HDR Studio, after the Merge to HDR step, you are presented with the image, and it feels like there should be a second step (the equivalent step to Photomatix&#8217;s &#8220;Tone Mapping&#8221; (automatic) step), but there isn&#8217;t, you are left to playing with all the sliders now. </p>
<p>Also, HDR Studio (for Mac) is extremely slow, compared to Photomatix Pro (Mac). It took 5-7 min. to process 6-7 RAW images (~12-14MB each). Have they slowed the free trial version down, or is there a bug in their new software, or&#8230;? (I have a 2GHz Duo MacBook, which fits their requirement.) </p>
<p>Larry,<br />
Do you have some settings (particularly in the Brightness/Contrast, Highlight/Shadow, and WhiteBalance settings), that I maybe just completely off on (particularly for house interior images with views out the windows)? </p>
<p>Blayne,<br />
Great blog, great images, and great testing of the 2 different software! Do you have any special settings (or any HDR Studios &#8221; recipes&#8221;, as  they call them) you can recommend </p>
<p>Thanks for any info, tips,<br />
Luke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/02/07/hdr-studio-by-unifiedcolor-announces-a-mac-version/comment-page-1/#comment-25136</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=4139#comment-25136</guid>
		<description>A member at realestatephotographers.net also made a blog post post about this topic.  I may have to take a closer look at this software.  The blog I&#039;m mentioning can be found here:  http://realestatephotographers.net/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=hdr-.html&amp;Itemid=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A member at realestatephotographers.net also made a blog post post about this topic.  I may have to take a closer look at this software.  The blog I&#8217;m mentioning can be found here:  <a href="http://realestatephotographers.net/index.php?option=com_myblog&#038;show=hdr-.html&#038;Itemid=1" rel="nofollow">http://realestatephotographers.net/index.php?option=com_myblog&#038;show=hdr-.html&#038;Itemid=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/02/07/hdr-studio-by-unifiedcolor-announces-a-mac-version/comment-page-1/#comment-25046</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=4139#comment-25046</guid>
		<description>This looks like a great photo program.  I&#039;ll have to give it a try.  Photoshop has been my standard equipment, but I can see a use for a simpler program at times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like a great photo program.  I&#8217;ll have to give it a try.  Photoshop has been my standard equipment, but I can see a use for a simpler program at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Darling</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/02/07/hdr-studio-by-unifiedcolor-announces-a-mac-version/comment-page-1/#comment-25044</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Darling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=4139#comment-25044</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll have to give it a try.  As a avid Photomatix user, I&#039;m exited to see the difference in programs. If it makes more realistic images, it will be great for real estate photography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have to give it a try.  As a avid Photomatix user, I&#8217;m exited to see the difference in programs. If it makes more realistic images, it will be great for real estate photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/02/07/hdr-studio-by-unifiedcolor-announces-a-mac-version/comment-page-1/#comment-25039</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=4139#comment-25039</guid>
		<description>@Blayne- Thanks for posting your examples. What I mean by &quot;being easier to produce a more realistic looking image&quot; is that I find that no matter what you do in HDR Studio, you cannot created the overcooked look that is so often seen with Photomatix created HDR images. Yes, as you nicely demonstrated you can produce realistic images in HDR Studio that look much like realistic images created with Photomatix but It looks to me like HDR Studio prevents you from creating that &quot;overcooked&quot; look. With Photomatix, it takes restrain on the part of the photographer running the sliders to get a realistic image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Blayne- Thanks for posting your examples. What I mean by &#8220;being easier to produce a more realistic looking image&#8221; is that I find that no matter what you do in HDR Studio, you cannot created the overcooked look that is so often seen with Photomatix created HDR images. Yes, as you nicely demonstrated you can produce realistic images in HDR Studio that look much like realistic images created with Photomatix but It looks to me like HDR Studio prevents you from creating that &#8220;overcooked&#8221; look. With Photomatix, it takes restrain on the part of the photographer running the sliders to get a realistic image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blayne Beacham</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/02/07/hdr-studio-by-unifiedcolor-announces-a-mac-version/comment-page-1/#comment-25038</link>
		<dc:creator>Blayne Beacham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=4139#comment-25038</guid>
		<description>If you want, you can read my blog.  I did a huge post today all based on your post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want, you can read my blog.  I did a huge post today all based on your post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Boros</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/02/07/hdr-studio-by-unifiedcolor-announces-a-mac-version/comment-page-1/#comment-25037</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Boros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=4139#comment-25037</guid>
		<description>I have been using the &quot;Exposure Fusion&quot; mode in Photomatix Pro 3.2 exclusively when I need to composite an image.  I find this mode makes much more realistic looking images without all the unwanted side effects of the HDR mode images.  Does anyone know if HDR Studio has an &quot;Exposure Fusion&quot; mode like Photomatix?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using the &#8220;Exposure Fusion&#8221; mode in Photomatix Pro 3.2 exclusively when I need to composite an image.  I find this mode makes much more realistic looking images without all the unwanted side effects of the HDR mode images.  Does anyone know if HDR Studio has an &#8220;Exposure Fusion&#8221; mode like Photomatix?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blayne Beacham</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2010/02/07/hdr-studio-by-unifiedcolor-announces-a-mac-version/comment-page-1/#comment-25034</link>
		<dc:creator>Blayne Beacham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=4139#comment-25034</guid>
		<description>I am excited about this.  I have become so upset recently about all the ghosting effects of Photomatix.  All I do is real estate photography, so the fuzziness of the images frustrates me.  I am going to download the trial.  I will be back to  tell you what I think.  I am so happy to have found your blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am excited about this.  I have become so upset recently about all the ghosting effects of Photomatix.  All I do is real estate photography, so the fuzziness of the images frustrates me.  I am going to download the trial.  I will be back to  tell you what I think.  I am so happy to have found your blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

