<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What You Need to Know About Uploading to MLSs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/09/09/what-you-need-to-know-about-uploading-to-mlss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/09/09/what-you-need-to-know-about-uploading-to-mlss/</link>
	<description>Tips and Techniques for Real Estate Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 18:12:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chad J</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/09/09/what-you-need-to-know-about-uploading-to-mlss/comment-page-1/#comment-20694</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=2929#comment-20694</guid>
		<description>The MLS I output for is Rappatoni.  I called the company and asked what the limitations were and what the system would do to images.  They are the same as Dylans, 400px wide and no limitation on length.  I have found the sweet spot by outputting from light room with longest edge 400px@72DPI w/sharpen for screen.  It seems that since the image meets the 400px wide or less that the image mangler skips over doing anything to them and just pushes them through as-is.  My images look better than any on the MLS.  Clear, sharp and no compression BS.  I use other photographers uploads as another way to differentiate myself from the other photog&#039;s in my area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MLS I output for is Rappatoni.  I called the company and asked what the limitations were and what the system would do to images.  They are the same as Dylans, 400px wide and no limitation on length.  I have found the sweet spot by outputting from light room with longest edge 400px@72DPI w/sharpen for screen.  It seems that since the image meets the 400px wide or less that the image mangler skips over doing anything to them and just pushes them through as-is.  My images look better than any on the MLS.  Clear, sharp and no compression BS.  I use other photographers uploads as another way to differentiate myself from the other photog&#8217;s in my area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Darling</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/09/09/what-you-need-to-know-about-uploading-to-mlss/comment-page-1/#comment-20615</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Darling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=2929#comment-20615</guid>
		<description>Our Central Oregon MLS only allows 400 pixels wide, no larger than 3 MB.  I&#039;ve found that reducing the size in Photoshop to 400 pixels wide at 72 DPI works the best.  I sharpen the photo, then use the &quot;Save for web and device&quot; option.  I&#039;ve tried other sizes, but this works the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our Central Oregon MLS only allows 400 pixels wide, no larger than 3 MB.  I&#8217;ve found that reducing the size in Photoshop to 400 pixels wide at 72 DPI works the best.  I sharpen the photo, then use the &#8220;Save for web and device&#8221; option.  I&#8217;ve tried other sizes, but this works the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krynop</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/09/09/what-you-need-to-know-about-uploading-to-mlss/comment-page-1/#comment-20613</link>
		<dc:creator>Krynop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=2929#comment-20613</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve stopped sharpening automatically because I find it increases the file size beyond our MLS limits. Our MLS is Paragon 4.0 (fnres.com). It messes with photos over 640 x 480 or larger than 32K.

It would be interesting if a matrix of MLS programs were assembled with some basic photo standard info like 1) file size, 2) dimensions, and 3) user tips. I can&#039;t imagine that there are that many programs out there.

Larry, this might be a nice resource for this website to host.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve stopped sharpening automatically because I find it increases the file size beyond our MLS limits. Our MLS is Paragon 4.0 (fnres.com). It messes with photos over 640 x 480 or larger than 32K.</p>
<p>It would be interesting if a matrix of MLS programs were assembled with some basic photo standard info like 1) file size, 2) dimensions, and 3) user tips. I can&#8217;t imagine that there are that many programs out there.</p>
<p>Larry, this might be a nice resource for this website to host.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/09/09/what-you-need-to-know-about-uploading-to-mlss/comment-page-1/#comment-20610</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=2929#comment-20610</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t speak for MLS, but on most  sites with auto photo resizing  it&#039;s best to upload actual size used at highest quality with sharpening, so no resizing done.  For 3x2 images increase canvas size to make the height 4x3 (photoshop batch action) if that&#039;s what the site uses which does leave a white border,  but IMHOP better than a cropped or stretch photo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t speak for MLS, but on most  sites with auto photo resizing  it&#8217;s best to upload actual size used at highest quality with sharpening, so no resizing done.  For 3&#215;2 images increase canvas size to make the height 4&#215;3 (photoshop batch action) if that&#8217;s what the site uses which does leave a white border,  but IMHOP better than a cropped or stretch photo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/09/09/what-you-need-to-know-about-uploading-to-mlss/comment-page-1/#comment-20609</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=2929#comment-20609</guid>
		<description>@Anonymous- Yes, you got it, that&#039;s exactly the point! You can&#039;t sharpen at final output size cause the MLS is going to do their &quot;photo mangling&quot; thing and re-compress even if you give them the final size!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anonymous- Yes, you got it, that&#8217;s exactly the point! You can&#8217;t sharpen at final output size cause the MLS is going to do their &#8220;photo mangling&#8221; thing and re-compress even if you give them the final size!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/09/09/what-you-need-to-know-about-uploading-to-mlss/comment-page-1/#comment-20608</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=2929#comment-20608</guid>
		<description>What about the golden rule of sharpening at final output size?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the golden rule of sharpening at final output size?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What You Need to Know About Uploading to MLSs &#8211; Larry Lohrman @ Photo News Today</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/09/09/what-you-need-to-know-about-uploading-to-mlss/comment-page-1/#comment-20603</link>
		<dc:creator>What You Need to Know About Uploading to MLSs &#8211; Larry Lohrman @ Photo News Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=2929#comment-20603</guid>
		<description>[...] Source and Read More:&#160;photographyforrealestate.net [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source and Read More:&nbsp;photographyforrealestate.net [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
