<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Combine HDR With Flash For The Best Of Both Worlds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/03/09/combine-hdr-with-flash-for-the-best-of-both-worlds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/03/09/combine-hdr-with-flash-for-the-best-of-both-worlds/</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:09:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/03/09/combine-hdr-with-flash-for-the-best-of-both-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-41444</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 06:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=1050#comment-41444</guid>
		<description>How about FEB?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about FEB?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/03/09/combine-hdr-with-flash-for-the-best-of-both-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-23738</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=1050#comment-23738</guid>
		<description>@Ed- For more details on this process see the PFRE discussion group:

http://www.flickr.com/groups/photographyforrealestate/discuss/72157615088733712/?search=HDR+flash

For the reasons you mention the bracketing is done manually to allow for recycle time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ed- For more details on this process see the PFRE discussion group:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/photographyforrealestate/discuss/72157615088733712/?search=HDR+flash">http://www.flickr.com/groups/photographyforrealestate/discuss/72157615088733712/?search=HDR+flash</a></p>
<p>For the reasons you mention the bracketing is done manually to allow for recycle time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/03/09/combine-hdr-with-flash-for-the-best-of-both-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-23737</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=1050#comment-23737</guid>
		<description>I noticed Sylvia didn&#039;t answer the following question on her Flickr so I&#039;ll ask it again here. How do you shoot each exposure level (-2, 0, +2) with the mounted flash given the varying recycle times of the flash? If you do AEB with continuous shooting then on the second and third shots the flash doesn&#039;t fire. The answer may be that I need a better flash (speedlite 420ex) but I am curious if Sylvia (or others) take each exposure shot one at a time so the flash fires or of it is in fact in continuous mode.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed Sylvia didn&#8217;t answer the following question on her Flickr so I&#8217;ll ask it again here. How do you shoot each exposure level (-2, 0, +2) with the mounted flash given the varying recycle times of the flash? If you do AEB with continuous shooting then on the second and third shots the flash doesn&#8217;t fire. The answer may be that I need a better flash (speedlite 420ex) but I am curious if Sylvia (or others) take each exposure shot one at a time so the flash fires or of it is in fact in continuous mode.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/03/09/combine-hdr-with-flash-for-the-best-of-both-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-15553</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=1050#comment-15553</guid>
		<description>Eric.
Would you be so kind as to tell me what picture slide show you used in your 3 examples above?

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric.<br />
Would you be so kind as to tell me what picture slide show you used in your 3 examples above?</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Darling</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/03/09/combine-hdr-with-flash-for-the-best-of-both-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-15104</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Darling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=1050#comment-15104</guid>
		<description>I blend flash and HDR, but in a bit of a different way.  I do a 3 image HDR (photomatix), then a flash shot.  I blend them together in PS.  Why do it?  The results speak for themselves.  HDR&#039;s are muddy, single flash shots have lots of shadows and usually don&#039;t light up the room properly.  When combining ambiant light from the HDR and artificial light from the flash, you get the best of both worlds.  Plus, its easy and doesn&#039;t take much time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blend flash and HDR, but in a bit of a different way.  I do a 3 image HDR (photomatix), then a flash shot.  I blend them together in PS.  Why do it?  The results speak for themselves.  HDR&#8217;s are muddy, single flash shots have lots of shadows and usually don&#8217;t light up the room properly.  When combining ambiant light from the HDR and artificial light from the flash, you get the best of both worlds.  Plus, its easy and doesn&#8217;t take much time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Switching to HDR in real estate &#124; CalevPhoto</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/03/09/combine-hdr-with-flash-for-the-best-of-both-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-15101</link>
		<dc:creator>Switching to HDR in real estate &#124; CalevPhoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=1050#comment-15101</guid>
		<description>[...] have also read about a technique that involves using a bounced flash set to manual mode with HDR, in order to improve the brightness [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have also read about a technique that involves using a bounced flash set to manual mode with HDR, in order to improve the brightness [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Grammer</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/03/09/combine-hdr-with-flash-for-the-best-of-both-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-15054</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Grammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 03:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=1050#comment-15054</guid>
		<description>Larry,
Apologies if my post was unclear...  I&#039;m super busy and rushed the comment.  I was offering the web sites listed as examples of precisely what you stated - use of a single strobe to eliminate many problems associated with HDR.  All the interior shots on those sites were created with a single strobe.
Best,
Erik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry,<br />
Apologies if my post was unclear&#8230;  I&#8217;m super busy and rushed the comment.  I was offering the web sites listed as examples of precisely what you stated &#8211; use of a single strobe to eliminate many problems associated with HDR.  All the interior shots on those sites were created with a single strobe.<br />
Best,<br />
Erik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/03/09/combine-hdr-with-flash-for-the-best-of-both-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-15048</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=1050#comment-15048</guid>
		<description>Erik- Others have raised this question too. I&#039;ll take the liberty of speaking for Sylvia and others that use this technique... I think the benefit of this approach is that for the minor cost of one on-camera flash (which doesn&#039;t slow you down on site) you eliminate many of the problems with the HDR process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erik- Others have raised this question too. I&#8217;ll take the liberty of speaking for Sylvia and others that use this technique&#8230; I think the benefit of this approach is that for the minor cost of one on-camera flash (which doesn&#8217;t slow you down on site) you eliminate many of the problems with the HDR process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Grammer</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/03/09/combine-hdr-with-flash-for-the-best-of-both-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-15047</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Grammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=1050#comment-15047</guid>
		<description>&quot;Well, nice idea, but I don’t entirly get it. Why still doing HDR if you are adding light already? Wasn’t the point of doing HDR to NOT flash the scene to begin with?&quot;

One might argue that the point of HDR is to capture a greater dynamic range and that not using a flash is merely a potential benefit of the process.  In practice, a major issue with HDR is white balance due to mixed light sources.  Adding a bit of daylight-balanced strobe can seriously mitigate that problem without making the strobe your primary light source:

http://www.2205robles.com
http://www.1533altadena.com
http://www.6579pickwickstreet.com

Best,
Erik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Well, nice idea, but I don’t entirly get it. Why still doing HDR if you are adding light already? Wasn’t the point of doing HDR to NOT flash the scene to begin with?&#8221;</p>
<p>One might argue that the point of HDR is to capture a greater dynamic range and that not using a flash is merely a potential benefit of the process.  In practice, a major issue with HDR is white balance due to mixed light sources.  Adding a bit of daylight-balanced strobe can seriously mitigate that problem without making the strobe your primary light source:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.2205robles.com">http://www.2205robles.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.1533altadena.com">http://www.1533altadena.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.6579pickwickstreet.com">http://www.6579pickwickstreet.com</a></p>
<p>Best,<br />
Erik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/03/09/combine-hdr-with-flash-for-the-best-of-both-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-14989</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=1050#comment-14989</guid>
		<description>It will not be long before we we will have the camera do HDR. Recently, I read Fuji has developed a sensor that does that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will not be long before we we will have the camera do HDR. Recently, I read Fuji has developed a sensor that does that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

