Comments on: Phanfare A Photosharing Site With Attractive Slide Shows http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/02/03/phanfare-a-photosharing-site-with-attractive-slide-shows/ Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful Fri, 25 May 2012 01:11:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: larry http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/02/03/phanfare-a-photosharing-site-with-attractive-slide-shows/comment-page-1/#comment-14594 larry Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:41:21 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=712#comment-14594 Patti- Slideshow Pro (http://slideshowpro.net/products/slideshowpro/slideshowpro_for_lightroom) does full screen flash slide shows like this: http://lohrman.com/exteriors/index.html Patti-
Slideshow Pro (http://slideshowpro.net/products/slideshowpro/slideshowpro_for_lightroom) does full screen flash slide shows like this:

http://lohrman.com/exteriors/index.html

]]> By: P Chandler http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/02/03/phanfare-a-photosharing-site-with-attractive-slide-shows/comment-page-1/#comment-14593 P Chandler Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:26:30 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=712#comment-14593 I have used phanfare since 2007. My clients have loved the full screen images. But the downsides are the inability to link to Realtor.com, the lack of agent name and contact info, as well as the occasional downtime with phanfare. I was having to create a separate video file for Realtor.com as they do not allow linking of sub domains. Sooo, I have added a lightroom slideshow that I host as an alternative. I use both, giving my clients the choice. A handful will not switch over to the lightroom veriosn as they prefer the full screen images on phanfare. Anyone know of a lightroom plugin with a full screen image option? I have used phanfare since 2007. My clients have loved the full screen images. But the downsides are the inability to link to Realtor.com, the lack of agent name and contact info, as well as the occasional downtime with phanfare. I was having to create a separate video file for Realtor.com as they do not allow linking of sub domains. Sooo, I have added a lightroom slideshow that I host as an alternative. I use both, giving my clients the choice. A handful will not switch over to the lightroom veriosn as they prefer the full screen images on phanfare. Anyone know of a lightroom plugin with a full screen image option?

]]> By: James Northen http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/02/03/phanfare-a-photosharing-site-with-attractive-slide-shows/comment-page-1/#comment-14500 James Northen Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:11:51 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=712#comment-14500 I use Phanfare for my slideshows and while it is not perfect, it is very fast. Name it upload it and copy the lnik and email it. Typically I have the images uploading as I am creating the brochure or editing the next set of images. The cost is also bery good.... unlimited shows for under 60 USD. M. James I use Phanfare for my slideshows and while it is not perfect, it is very fast. Name it upload it and copy the lnik and email it. Typically I have the images uploading as I am creating the brochure or editing the next set of images. The cost is also bery good…. unlimited shows for under 60 USD.

M. James

]]> By: Phanfare A Photosharing Site With Attractive Slide Shows - Larry Lohrman | Photo News Today http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/02/03/phanfare-a-photosharing-site-with-attractive-slide-shows/comment-page-1/#comment-14450 Phanfare A Photosharing Site With Attractive Slide Shows - Larry Lohrman | Photo News Today Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:21:25 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=712#comment-14450 [...] Source and Read More: photographyforrealestate.net [...] [...] Source and Read More: photographyforrealestate.net [...]

]]> By: Jakob http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/02/03/phanfare-a-photosharing-site-with-attractive-slide-shows/comment-page-1/#comment-14436 Jakob Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:47:36 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=712#comment-14436 This is nice. Thanks for posting. I would say the Ken Burns needs a little optimizing as it is a little choppy in my browser. Much better just leaving it off for me. This is nice. Thanks for posting. I would say the Ken Burns needs a little optimizing as it is a little choppy in my browser. Much better just leaving it off for me.

]]>