<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alternatives For Controlling Window Brightness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/01/18/alternatives-for-controlling-window-brightness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/01/18/alternatives-for-controlling-window-brightness/</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:04:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Walker</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/01/18/alternatives-for-controlling-window-brightness/comment-page-1/#comment-45203</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=532#comment-45203</guid>
		<description>Some good sound advise. I like HDR if it is not overly &quot;photoshopped&quot; and has the natural look. Realtors and brokers want the natural look an not some artsy faked look. They want the potential clients to see in person what the picture conveyed. 

I also have found the twilight time period to work great. I like to wait for when the interior and outside light levels are about the same. But one only gets one house done in this time period. Best to save that for the upscale houses that need great pictures for that high end pricing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some good sound advise. I like HDR if it is not overly &#8220;photoshopped&#8221; and has the natural look. Realtors and brokers want the natural look an not some artsy faked look. They want the potential clients to see in person what the picture conveyed. </p>
<p>I also have found the twilight time period to work great. I like to wait for when the interior and outside light levels are about the same. But one only gets one house done in this time period. Best to save that for the upscale houses that need great pictures for that high end pricing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Estate Photography &#124; North Sound Property News</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/01/18/alternatives-for-controlling-window-brightness/comment-page-1/#comment-26726</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Estate Photography &#124; North Sound Property News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 01:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=532#comment-26726</guid>
		<description>[...] For Real Estate has a popular post on how to control window lighting.  This is the classic real estate photography issue - on a sunny day, bright light floods in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For Real Estate has a popular post on how to control window lighting.  This is the classic real estate photography issue &#8211; on a sunny day, bright light floods in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Eichler</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/01/18/alternatives-for-controlling-window-brightness/comment-page-1/#comment-25687</link>
		<dc:creator>David Eichler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=532#comment-25687</guid>
		<description>For me, unless it is a sunset, side-lighting of the exterior would be best because it creates a sense of depth. Direct frontal lighting, i.e. with the sun behind the camera, would yield a very flat and uniform effect, which I think would be less interesting in many cases.

And, if it is mild, backlighting of the exterior can be very attractive.  

However, it seems to me that all of this really depends on how strong or diffused the sunlight is, and the time of day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, unless it is a sunset, side-lighting of the exterior would be best because it creates a sense of depth. Direct frontal lighting, i.e. with the sun behind the camera, would yield a very flat and uniform effect, which I think would be less interesting in many cases.</p>
<p>And, if it is mild, backlighting of the exterior can be very attractive.  </p>
<p>However, it seems to me that all of this really depends on how strong or diffused the sunlight is, and the time of day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Hargis</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/01/18/alternatives-for-controlling-window-brightness/comment-page-1/#comment-25686</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hargis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=532#comment-25686</guid>
		<description>@ Erik G. --- Actually, the opposite is true. What you say sounds intuitive, but in fact if the sun is behind you, then the objects you&#039;re seeing out the window are being directly illuminated, and are as bright as it is possible for them to be. Much better to be looking at the shadow side of foliage etc. Easier to expose for.

That said, if the goal is to render the view itself as pretty as possible, then having the sun behind you is the way to go, generally. But in the context of this article, that situation really makes integrating the view exposure and the interior exposure much, much harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Erik G. &#8212; Actually, the opposite is true. What you say sounds intuitive, but in fact if the sun is behind you, then the objects you&#8217;re seeing out the window are being directly illuminated, and are as bright as it is possible for them to be. Much better to be looking at the shadow side of foliage etc. Easier to expose for.</p>
<p>That said, if the goal is to render the view itself as pretty as possible, then having the sun behind you is the way to go, generally. But in the context of this article, that situation really makes integrating the view exposure and the interior exposure much, much harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Requa</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/01/18/alternatives-for-controlling-window-brightness/comment-page-1/#comment-25675</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Requa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=532#comment-25675</guid>
		<description>For interior shots on a sunny day, it is best to shoot either early in the morning or later in the afternoon depending on which way the home is facing.  It might require mulitple visits, but worth it.  You can take advantage of those long shadows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For interior shots on a sunny day, it is best to shoot either early in the morning or later in the afternoon depending on which way the home is facing.  It might require mulitple visits, but worth it.  You can take advantage of those long shadows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Grammer</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/01/18/alternatives-for-controlling-window-brightness/comment-page-1/#comment-14239</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Grammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=532#comment-14239</guid>
		<description>Also good to keep the sun behind you so that it shines on the view, not the window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also good to keep the sun behind you so that it shines on the view, not the window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: family photography</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/01/18/alternatives-for-controlling-window-brightness/comment-page-1/#comment-14226</link>
		<dc:creator>family photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=532#comment-14226</guid>
		<description>Thanks, a great range of options for dealing with internal/window brightness issues - which can be extremely frustrating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, a great range of options for dealing with internal/window brightness issues &#8211; which can be extremely frustrating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous#1</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/01/18/alternatives-for-controlling-window-brightness/comment-page-1/#comment-14219</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous#1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=532#comment-14219</guid>
		<description>Very neat. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very neat. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photo News Today &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Alternatives For Controlling Window Brightness - Larry Lohrman</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2009/01/18/alternatives-for-controlling-window-brightness/comment-page-1/#comment-14216</link>
		<dc:creator>Photo News Today &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Alternatives For Controlling Window Brightness - Larry Lohrman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=532#comment-14216</guid>
		<description>[...] Source and Read More:&#160;photographyforrealestate.net [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source and Read More:&nbsp;photographyforrealestate.net [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

