<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update On Compact Camera&#8217;s For Real Estate Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:02:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photography and Video (Updated 12/16/08) &#171; A Blog for Real Estate Agents</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-14086</link>
		<dc:creator>Photography and Video (Updated 12/16/08) &#171; A Blog for Real Estate Agents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-14086</guid>
		<description>[...] 12/16/2008 - An article on the Photography for Real Estate Blog was interesting - Update On Compact Camera’s For Real Estate Photography. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 12/16/2008 &#8211; An article on the Photography for Real Estate Blog was interesting &#8211; Update On Compact Camera’s For Real Estate Photography. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Ellender</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-13807</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Ellender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-13807</guid>
		<description>Oh, nearly forgot! I was very impressed with the 2 year standard warranty, plus the ectra year the camera shop threw in PLUS Ricoh have a 3 Month unconditional guarantee .. I can chuck it off the Eureka tower &amp; just go &amp; get a new one if I want!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, nearly forgot! I was very impressed with the 2 year standard warranty, plus the ectra year the camera shop threw in PLUS Ricoh have a 3 Month unconditional guarantee .. I can chuck it off the Eureka tower &amp; just go &amp; get a new one if I want!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Ellender</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-13806</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Ellender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-13806</guid>
		<description>Today I set off with every intention of buying the Panasonic, no-one at my nearest huge shopping mall had it in stock.

 I came back home &amp; cup of tea in hand started phoning around, several cups of tea later I had discovered a pattern ...

 there was a waiting list for this camera at most stores but it seemed as if no-one in Melbourne actually had one, I could have got what may have been the last one in Sydney sent overnight though!

The pattern I discovered though was that most retailers seemed to like the camera they were very peeved with Panasonic &amp; felt very let down, especially as most could not give a firm delivery date &amp; could not promise to have it before Christmas, a few muttered things like &quot;typical Panasonic behaviour&quot; ... so, this got me-a-thinking ... what with the debacle about the RAW support &amp; what seemed like poor retailer support I decided to come back to this site &amp; have another read.

I am now the proud owner of a Ricoh GX-200 EVF Kit. This camera feel beautiful in the hand &amp; evrything you touch feels well made. The removable tilting electronic viewfinder is great to use when wearing my glasses. The automatic opening/closing lens cap reminded my Son of an episode of Doctor Who, it&#039;s very cool :) http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/gallery/s1_07gallery/800/20.jpg

The only thing I thought long &amp; hard about pre-purchase today was the poor range for Auto Exposure Bracketing: +/- 0.3/0.5 EV. As I have been trying out some HDR techniques lately I still believe that I can pull this off if I shoot in RAW .. by the way DNG so no worries there!

Well that&#039;s my tale &amp; after dinner I sat down &amp; looked at all the pieces &amp; started reading the fine manual. I&#039;ll report back in a few days, if you don&#039;t mind, with my first shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I set off with every intention of buying the Panasonic, no-one at my nearest huge shopping mall had it in stock.</p>
<p> I came back home &amp; cup of tea in hand started phoning around, several cups of tea later I had discovered a pattern &#8230;</p>
<p> there was a waiting list for this camera at most stores but it seemed as if no-one in Melbourne actually had one, I could have got what may have been the last one in Sydney sent overnight though!</p>
<p>The pattern I discovered though was that most retailers seemed to like the camera they were very peeved with Panasonic &amp; felt very let down, especially as most could not give a firm delivery date &amp; could not promise to have it before Christmas, a few muttered things like &#8220;typical Panasonic behaviour&#8221; &#8230; so, this got me-a-thinking &#8230; what with the debacle about the RAW support &amp; what seemed like poor retailer support I decided to come back to this site &amp; have another read.</p>
<p>I am now the proud owner of a Ricoh GX-200 EVF Kit. This camera feel beautiful in the hand &amp; evrything you touch feels well made. The removable tilting electronic viewfinder is great to use when wearing my glasses. The automatic opening/closing lens cap reminded my Son of an episode of Doctor Who, it&#8217;s very cool <img src='http://photographyforrealestate.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/gallery/s1_07gallery/800/20.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/gallery/s1_07gallery/800/20.jpg</a></p>
<p>The only thing I thought long &amp; hard about pre-purchase today was the poor range for Auto Exposure Bracketing: +/- 0.3/0.5 EV. As I have been trying out some HDR techniques lately I still believe that I can pull this off if I shoot in RAW .. by the way DNG so no worries there!</p>
<p>Well that&#8217;s my tale &amp; after dinner I sat down &amp; looked at all the pieces &amp; started reading the fine manual. I&#8217;ll report back in a few days, if you don&#8217;t mind, with my first shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photography For Real Estate &#187; Lightroom 2.2 Available</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-13744</link>
		<dc:creator>Photography For Real Estate &#187; Lightroom 2.2 Available</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-13744</guid>
		<description>[...] This is a free update that includes the long awaited Panasonic DMC-LX3 Camera RAW support that I talked about a few days ago. Click here (Tom Hogarty&#8217;s blog) for all the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is a free update that includes the long awaited Panasonic DMC-LX3 Camera RAW support that I talked about a few days ago. Click here (Tom Hogarty&#8217;s blog) for all the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-13742</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-13742</guid>
		<description>Richard- Yes:

 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/573592-REG/Panasonic_DMC_LX3K_Lumix_DMC_LX3_Digital_Camera.html/KBI/2847</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard- Yes:</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/573592-REG/Panasonic_DMC_LX3K_Lumix_DMC_LX3_Digital_Camera.html/KBI/2847" rel="nofollow">http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/573592-REG/Panasonic_DMC_LX3K_Lumix_DMC_LX3_Digital_Camera.html/KBI/2847</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Ellender</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-13739</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Ellender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-13739</guid>
		<description>Yay! Thanks for the update.  I also saw this just now on http://luminous-landscape.com/whatsnew/#322 that there is a new version of lightroom which adds raw support for this camera. I&#039;ve just installed it &amp; it opens the .rw2 file just fine!

If you could help me with one more thing please,  just so I get the right/newest model number,  it&#039;s the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay! Thanks for the update.  I also saw this just now on <a href="http://luminous-landscape.com/whatsnew/#322" rel="nofollow">http://luminous-landscape.com/whatsnew/#322</a> that there is a new version of lightroom which adds raw support for this camera. I&#8217;ve just installed it &amp; it opens the .rw2 file just fine!</p>
<p>If you could help me with one more thing please,  just so I get the right/newest model number,  it&#8217;s the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photo News Today &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Update On Compact Camera&#8217;s For Real Estate Photography</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-13719</link>
		<dc:creator>Photo News Today &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Update On Compact Camera&#8217;s For Real Estate Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-13719</guid>
		<description>[...] Source and Read More:&#160;photographyforrealestate.net [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source and Read More:&nbsp;photographyforrealestate.net [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-13695</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-13695</guid>
		<description>Hi Marc- Long time, no hear. Thanks for the links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Marc- Long time, no hear. Thanks for the links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Lacoste</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-13684</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Lacoste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-13684</guid>
		<description>I love my Ricoh GX-100, but the Lumix LX3 is really tempting. I wasn&#039;t at first, because I thought it was lacking a wide angle converter.

But it isn&#039;t the case : Panasonic makes a .75 converter, for the equivalent of a 18mm lens, great!
http://panasonic.net/avc/lumix/compact/lx3/optional_accessories.html

And there is also a really cute 2*AA flash, with a bounce head :)
http://panasonic.net/avc/lumix/popup/pressrelease/dmw_fl220.html

Mmmh. Panasonic is gaining points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my Ricoh GX-100, but the Lumix LX3 is really tempting. I wasn&#8217;t at first, because I thought it was lacking a wide angle converter.</p>
<p>But it isn&#8217;t the case : Panasonic makes a .75 converter, for the equivalent of a 18mm lens, great!<br />
<a href="http://panasonic.net/avc/lumix/compact/lx3/optional_accessories.html" rel="nofollow">http://panasonic.net/avc/lumix/compact/lx3/optional_accessories.html</a></p>
<p>And there is also a really cute 2*AA flash, with a bounce head <img src='http://photographyforrealestate.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<a href="http://panasonic.net/avc/lumix/popup/pressrelease/dmw_fl220.html" rel="nofollow">http://panasonic.net/avc/lumix/popup/pressrelease/dmw_fl220.html</a></p>
<p>Mmmh. Panasonic is gaining points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Claghorn</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-13668</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Claghorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/12/12/update-on-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-13668</guid>
		<description>We recently bought a Panasonic Lumix FX-35 for testing purposes.  I took it out on a shoot and made all the same shots as I did with the Nikon D-80 and 12-24mm Nikkor.  Of course, there is a noticable difference in the width of the shot, and the little tiny onboard flash can&#039;t come close to the SB800 Speedlight with the Nikon.  But, for the typical agent, we believe this camera is a fairly decent option.  

You can find the FX35 new for $349 or less.  It&#039;s shirt pocket sized, 10.1 megapixel, with a 25mm lens (unusually wide for this type of camera).  It is also capable of recording 720p Hi Def Video If you find one significantly cheaper than that, be concious of what your getting with it.  

To see comparison shots between the Nikon D-80 Digital SLR and the Panasonic Lumix FX35, click this link:  http://buildatour.com/Home/Forum/tabid/123/aff/1/aft/4/afv/topic/Default.aspx

For Overview, Tech Specs, Accessories, and reviews, click this link:  http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-Camcorders/Digital-Cameras/Lumix-Digital-Cameras/model.DMC-FX35S.O_11002_7000000000000005702#tabsection</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We recently bought a Panasonic Lumix FX-35 for testing purposes.  I took it out on a shoot and made all the same shots as I did with the Nikon D-80 and 12-24mm Nikkor.  Of course, there is a noticable difference in the width of the shot, and the little tiny onboard flash can&#8217;t come close to the SB800 Speedlight with the Nikon.  But, for the typical agent, we believe this camera is a fairly decent option.  </p>
<p>You can find the FX35 new for $349 or less.  It&#8217;s shirt pocket sized, 10.1 megapixel, with a 25mm lens (unusually wide for this type of camera).  It is also capable of recording 720p Hi Def Video If you find one significantly cheaper than that, be concious of what your getting with it.  </p>
<p>To see comparison shots between the Nikon D-80 Digital SLR and the Panasonic Lumix FX35, click this link:  <a href="http://buildatour.com/Home/Forum/tabid/123/aff/1/aft/4/afv/topic/Default.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://buildatour.com/Home/Forum/tabid/123/aff/1/aft/4/afv/topic/Default.aspx</a></p>
<p>For Overview, Tech Specs, Accessories, and reviews, click this link:  <a href="http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-Camcorders/Digital-Cameras/Lumix-Digital-Cameras/model.DMC-FX35S.O_11002_7000000000000005702#tabsection" rel="nofollow">http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-Camcorders/Digital-Cameras/Lumix-Digital-Cameras/model.DMC-FX35S.O_11002_7000000000000005702#tabsection</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

