<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightroom Enfuse Tutorial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/09/10/lightroom-enfuse-tutorial-on-vimeo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/09/10/lightroom-enfuse-tutorial-on-vimeo/</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 01:11:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/09/10/lightroom-enfuse-tutorial-on-vimeo/comment-page-1/#comment-14073</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/09/10/lightroom-enfuse-tutorial-on-vimeo/#comment-14073</guid>
		<description>Michael- Sorry, I just updated the links above. I was kicked off of Vimeo because they don&#039;t allow anything related to real estate. I&#039;m in the process of hosting all my tutorial videos myself so I can provide high quality. In the mean time this video is on youtube at:

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTuzyW34xAo

All of my current video tutorials have links at:

  http://photographyforrealestate.net/articles/

The &quot;tutorial&quot; link along the top of the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael- Sorry, I just updated the links above. I was kicked off of Vimeo because they don&#8217;t allow anything related to real estate. I&#8217;m in the process of hosting all my tutorial videos myself so I can provide high quality. In the mean time this video is on youtube at:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTuzyW34xAo">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTuzyW34xAo</a></p>
<p>All of my current video tutorials have links at:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/articles/">http://photographyforrealestate.net/articles/</a></p>
<p>The &#8220;tutorial&#8221; link along the top of the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/09/10/lightroom-enfuse-tutorial-on-vimeo/comment-page-1/#comment-14072</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/09/10/lightroom-enfuse-tutorial-on-vimeo/#comment-14072</guid>
		<description>video is missing from vimeo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>video is missing from vimeo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Martin</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/09/10/lightroom-enfuse-tutorial-on-vimeo/comment-page-1/#comment-11165</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/09/10/lightroom-enfuse-tutorial-on-vimeo/#comment-11165</guid>
		<description>From what I&#039;ve read on the www.pangeasoft.net website, Bracketeer looks like a Mac only application.  Is that true?  

How would you rate Bracketeer compared to Photomatix?  

I also have a hard time relating the use of products like Bracketeer with Enfuse with Lightroom.  I can&#039;t tell which is on first base (i.e., Light Room, Enfurse or Bracketeer).  Please help me make sense of these relationships.

I&#039;ve used Photomatix for a long time with pretty wonderful results.  However, I&#039;m always looking for something better.  

My biggest problem with HDR imaging is color balance.  Since it uses no flash::: In a typical room situation with large windows, the choice is obvious: natural light.  However, when natural ambient light isn&#039;t as strong, the choice might be tungsten.  Unfortunately, that makes views thru windows look too blue.  So what&#039;s the better answer?  I hope it&#039;s not just more post processing with Photoshop/etc.

Bottom Line:  I believe in the future of HDR imaging.  I want to keep on top of the best software products to develop great RE images.  Sometimes, nothing artificially added (i.e. no flash) is the best choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve read on the <a href="http://www.pangeasoft.net">http://www.pangeasoft.net</a> website, Bracketeer looks like a Mac only application.  Is that true?  </p>
<p>How would you rate Bracketeer compared to Photomatix?  </p>
<p>I also have a hard time relating the use of products like Bracketeer with Enfuse with Lightroom.  I can&#8217;t tell which is on first base (i.e., Light Room, Enfurse or Bracketeer).  Please help me make sense of these relationships.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used Photomatix for a long time with pretty wonderful results.  However, I&#8217;m always looking for something better.  </p>
<p>My biggest problem with HDR imaging is color balance.  Since it uses no flash::: In a typical room situation with large windows, the choice is obvious: natural light.  However, when natural ambient light isn&#8217;t as strong, the choice might be tungsten.  Unfortunately, that makes views thru windows look too blue.  So what&#8217;s the better answer?  I hope it&#8217;s not just more post processing with Photoshop/etc.</p>
<p>Bottom Line:  I believe in the future of HDR imaging.  I want to keep on top of the best software products to develop great RE images.  Sometimes, nothing artificially added (i.e. no flash) is the best choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Photography &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lightroom Enfuse Tutorial on Vimeo</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/09/10/lightroom-enfuse-tutorial-on-vimeo/comment-page-1/#comment-11154</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Photography &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lightroom Enfuse Tutorial on Vimeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/09/10/lightroom-enfuse-tutorial-on-vimeo/#comment-11154</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital photography by larry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital photography by larry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Palermo</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/09/10/lightroom-enfuse-tutorial-on-vimeo/comment-page-1/#comment-11153</link>
		<dc:creator>David Palermo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/09/10/lightroom-enfuse-tutorial-on-vimeo/#comment-11153</guid>
		<description>Great tutorial Larry.  Now I can put a voice to your face!  So besides being convenient that it works in LightRoom I don&#039;t see any real advantage to buying it since I already have Bracketeer which allows me to include or not include images used for the blend.  It also allows me to make changes with sliders and see a preview before I start the blending process.

The problem I have with all these processes is that when I blend an interior with bright windows the edges of the windows become &quot;muddy&quot; looking and boy that really bugs me!  I&#039;d pay lots of money to someone who can correct that situation!  Here is an example of &quot;muddy&quot; windows:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/7937835@N03/2842527718

And here is a nice example by Scott Hargis (by using flash) of very clean window slats (ok they are NOT called slats but I can&#039;t remember what the heck they&#039;re called).  I am referring to the wood pieces IN the window.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/scotthargis/2844585745</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tutorial Larry.  Now I can put a voice to your face!  So besides being convenient that it works in LightRoom I don&#8217;t see any real advantage to buying it since I already have Bracketeer which allows me to include or not include images used for the blend.  It also allows me to make changes with sliders and see a preview before I start the blending process.</p>
<p>The problem I have with all these processes is that when I blend an interior with bright windows the edges of the windows become &#8220;muddy&#8221; looking and boy that really bugs me!  I&#8217;d pay lots of money to someone who can correct that situation!  Here is an example of &#8220;muddy&#8221; windows:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/7937835@N03/2842527718">http://www.flickr.com/photos/7937835@N03/2842527718</a></p>
<p>And here is a nice example by Scott Hargis (by using flash) of very clean window slats (ok they are NOT called slats but I can&#8217;t remember what the heck they&#8217;re called).  I am referring to the wood pieces IN the window.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/scotthargis/2844585745">http://www.flickr.com/photos/scotthargis/2844585745</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video :: Lightroom 2 Enfuse Tutorial at Imaging Insider</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/09/10/lightroom-enfuse-tutorial-on-vimeo/comment-page-1/#comment-11152</link>
		<dc:creator>Video :: Lightroom 2 Enfuse Tutorial at Imaging Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/09/10/lightroom-enfuse-tutorial-on-vimeo/#comment-11152</guid>
		<description>[...] Go to Video&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Go to Video&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

