<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Contender For A Canon G9 Pole Camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 01:11:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cris</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-13974</link>
		<dc:creator>Cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 06:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/#comment-13974</guid>
		<description>I have recently adapted a Panasonic LX3 to take photographs from a handheld 10-meter pole using a home built interval timer that repeats every 10 seconds. I really like the camera and its performance from the pole.  

You can find details at:

http://steel.ced.berkeley.edu/cris/kap/discuss/comments.php?DiscussionID=1841&amp;page=1#Item_7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently adapted a Panasonic LX3 to take photographs from a handheld 10-meter pole using a home built interval timer that repeats every 10 seconds. I really like the camera and its performance from the pole.  </p>
<p>You can find details at:</p>
<p><a href="http://steel.ced.berkeley.edu/cris/kap/discuss/comments.php?DiscussionID=1841&#038;page=1#Item_7">http://steel.ced.berkeley.edu/cris/kap/discuss/comments.php?DiscussionID=1841&#038;page=1#Item_7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-11279</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 04:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/#comment-11279</guid>
		<description>Mike- Yes it does. I have the manual sitting in front of me (pg 76) delay timer is 10, 15, 20, 30 sec.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike- Yes it does. I have the manual sitting in front of me (pg 76) delay timer is 10, 15, 20, 30 sec.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Martin</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-11277</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 02:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/#comment-11277</guid>
		<description>Larry,
The biggest flaw is that it doesn&#039;t have an up to 30 second delay timer.  I can&#039;t get my pole up in less than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry,<br />
The biggest flaw is that it doesn&#8217;t have an up to 30 second delay timer.  I can&#8217;t get my pole up in less than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-11170</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/#comment-11170</guid>
		<description>Do you think the micro four thirds technology will work well for PAP?  I thought so when micro four thirds was announced, but now seeing the Lumix G1, it might be the best option for PAP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think the micro four thirds technology will work well for PAP?  I thought so when micro four thirds was announced, but now seeing the Lumix G1, it might be the best option for PAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-11123</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 05:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/#comment-11123</guid>
		<description>The problem with the Lumix is the same problem with the majority of the new P&amp;S...no flipping viewfinder. granted the G9&#039;s is not accurate but it is there to use. i had a nikon 8400..bought in brand new in a wolf camera store..they apologized because it was &quot;old technology&quot; and sold it to me for $285.00..took perfect pictures but i dropped it and the AF is trashed and nobody to fix it. 

so for now, i will stick with the canon G9 (aka Leica light) and old fashioned side grip for my travel camera and a sony DSC R! (10.2 mb with Zeiss 24-120mm for my large landscape pictures while my 20D sits in my bag losing value each day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with the Lumix is the same problem with the majority of the new P&amp;S&#8230;no flipping viewfinder. granted the G9&#8242;s is not accurate but it is there to use. i had a nikon 8400..bought in brand new in a wolf camera store..they apologized because it was &#8220;old technology&#8221; and sold it to me for $285.00..took perfect pictures but i dropped it and the AF is trashed and nobody to fix it. </p>
<p>so for now, i will stick with the canon G9 (aka Leica light) and old fashioned side grip for my travel camera and a sony DSC R! (10.2 mb with Zeiss 24-120mm for my large landscape pictures while my 20D sits in my bag losing value each day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cole</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-8083</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/#comment-8083</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen several articles that say it also has an 18mm converter for it as well. But I have no idea how good that lens is.

Here&#039;s a couple articles I&#039;ve seen on it....

http://panasonic.net/pavc/lumix/lx3/index.html
http://www.i4u.com/article19155.html
http://gizmodo.com/5027211/panasonic-lumix-lx3-high+end-point+and+shoot-dumps-pixels-to-stay-sensitive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen several articles that say it also has an 18mm converter for it as well. But I have no idea how good that lens is.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a couple articles I&#8217;ve seen on it&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://panasonic.net/pavc/lumix/lx3/index.html">http://panasonic.net/pavc/lumix/lx3/index.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.i4u.com/article19155.html">http://www.i4u.com/article19155.html</a><br />
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5027211/panasonic-lumix-lx3-high+end-point+and+shoot-dumps-pixels-to-stay-sensitive">http://gizmodo.com/5027211/panasonic-lumix-lx3-high+end-point+and+shoot-dumps-pixels-to-stay-sensitive</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-8051</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/#comment-8051</guid>
		<description>Mike- Only info I have is from dpreview.com it&#039;s not even on the market until sometime in Sept.

Bruce- Yes, I&#039;ve heard about the Ricoh GX100, that&#039;s one of the point and shoots that Sabrina Huang has in her list that I referred to in my last point-and-shoot post:

http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/07/18/what-about-using-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike- Only info I have is from dpreview.com it&#8217;s not even on the market until sometime in Sept.</p>
<p>Bruce- Yes, I&#8217;ve heard about the Ricoh GX100, that&#8217;s one of the point and shoots that Sabrina Huang has in her list that I referred to in my last point-and-shoot post:</p>
<p><a href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/07/18/what-about-using-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/07/18/what-about-using-compact-cameras-for-real-estate-photography/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-8040</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/#comment-8040</guid>
		<description>Excuse spelling mistakes above- the intervalometer on the GX100 allows the camera to take a series of shots as close as five seconds apart- set it going, hoist the pole up, wave it around for a minute or so in the general direction - you soon get the hang of it- , pull it down, and you&#039;ll have at least one great shot! Couple with the 19 mm equiv adapter, and it&#039;s a no-brainer. Beautifully made, high quality images,  RAW availability, and I don&#039;t work for Ricoh!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse spelling mistakes above- the intervalometer on the GX100 allows the camera to take a series of shots as close as five seconds apart- set it going, hoist the pole up, wave it around for a minute or so in the general direction &#8211; you soon get the hang of it- , pull it down, and you&#8217;ll have at least one great shot! Couple with the 19 mm equiv adapter, and it&#8217;s a no-brainer. Beautifully made, high quality images,  RAW availability, and I don&#8217;t work for Ricoh!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-8038</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/#comment-8038</guid>
		<description>My Ricoh GX100  has intervalometer, shoots RAW, has 10mpixel and has 24mm equiv, and a 19 mm adapter. The new GX200 is an upgrade, but I find the 100 a fantastic pole cam. It&#039;s small and light, and fits in a pocket. A totally underrated camrea, although I believe Ricohs are not popular in the USA. ( I&#039;m downunedr in Oz)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Ricoh GX100  has intervalometer, shoots RAW, has 10mpixel and has 24mm equiv, and a 19 mm adapter. The new GX200 is an upgrade, but I find the 100 a fantastic pole cam. It&#8217;s small and light, and fits in a pocket. A totally underrated camrea, although I believe Ricohs are not popular in the USA. ( I&#8217;m downunedr in Oz)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Martin</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-8037</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/08/13/new-contender-for-a-canon-g9-pole-camera/#comment-8037</guid>
		<description>Larry,
I can&#039;t find an on-line manual for this camera.  Does it give me up to 30 seconds delay time to get my pole up before it trips?  Once up, does it take a burst of at least 5 shots?  Does it do all this with very loud sound effects (i.e., so I don&#039;t have to guess when things are complete)?  My little Canon does all this but not RAW and not 24mm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry,<br />
I can&#8217;t find an on-line manual for this camera.  Does it give me up to 30 seconds delay time to get my pole up before it trips?  Once up, does it take a burst of at least 5 shots?  Does it do all this with very loud sound effects (i.e., so I don&#8217;t have to guess when things are complete)?  My little Canon does all this but not RAW and not 24mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

