<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Good News and The Bad News For Real Estate Photographers</title>
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/</link>
	<description>Tips and Techniques for Real Estate Photography</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Photo News Today &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Good News and The Bad News For Real Estate Photographers</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6485</link>
		<dc:creator>Photo News Today &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Good News and The Bad News For Real Estate Photographers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6485</guid>
		<description>[...] Source and Read More:&#160;photographyforrealestate.net [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Source and Read More:&nbsp;photographyforrealestate.net [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6484</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6484</guid>
		<description>Mike- A lot depends on the agreed to commission arrangement with the seller. If the agent has discounted their commission to get the listing then they are more likely to ask the seller to pay for things. On the other hand, if they have advertised themselves as a "full service" listing agent, sellers expect to have the agent pay. There's no set arrangement, each listing is a different contract with different agreements and expectations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike- A lot depends on the agreed to commission arrangement with the seller. If the agent has discounted their commission to get the listing then they are more likely to ask the seller to pay for things. On the other hand, if they have advertised themselves as a &#8220;full service&#8221; listing agent, sellers expect to have the agent pay. There&#8217;s no set arrangement, each listing is a different contract with different agreements and expectations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cole</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6483</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6483</guid>
		<description>I’ve wondered why agents don’t just ask their sellers to pay for the photography. Granted, the seller probably feels they’re already paying enough in commission. But agents seem to be able to convince a lot of people to pay extra for things like staging - which costs a whole lot more than professional photography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve wondered why agents don’t just ask their sellers to pay for the photography. Granted, the seller probably feels they’re already paying enough in commission. But agents seem to be able to convince a lot of people to pay extra for things like staging - which costs a whole lot more than professional photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6457</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6457</guid>
		<description>Larry,
Thanks a lot for the prompt reply.
Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry,<br />
Thanks a lot for the prompt reply.<br />
Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Yother</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6448</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Yother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 03:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6448</guid>
		<description>Interesting.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, I've been doing the cover photos for Homes &#38; Land magazine in my area and receiving free ad space in lieu of payment. Lately, my half-page ad has been aimed at Sellers asking if the photos of their home for sale look like the ones in the ad. Then, explaining if they want our photos, they have to contact one of our client Realtors who I've listed by office, phone number and name. Still to early to see if its making much impact but will monitor and redo the ads regularly.

Another thing we've been doing for a while is to provide the Realtors with a CD of their virtual tours and a custom but simple splash page with addresses to choose from. The I show the Realtors how to copy it to their laptops so they have it readily available when making listing calls. Feedback has been really positive and they say after making their listing presentations, they show the sellers their laptop examples and its almost always a done deal.

Guess I've always considered the Realtor to be our customer and the seller as their customer. By helping our customers get more orders (listings), we also get more orders.

Just some of the ideas we've used.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.</p>
<p>As I mentioned in an earlier post, I&#8217;ve been doing the cover photos for Homes &amp; Land magazine in my area and receiving free ad space in lieu of payment. Lately, my half-page ad has been aimed at Sellers asking if the photos of their home for sale look like the ones in the ad. Then, explaining if they want our photos, they have to contact one of our client Realtors who I&#8217;ve listed by office, phone number and name. Still to early to see if its making much impact but will monitor and redo the ads regularly.</p>
<p>Another thing we&#8217;ve been doing for a while is to provide the Realtors with a CD of their virtual tours and a custom but simple splash page with addresses to choose from. The I show the Realtors how to copy it to their laptops so they have it readily available when making listing calls. Feedback has been really positive and they say after making their listing presentations, they show the sellers their laptop examples and its almost always a done deal.</p>
<p>Guess I&#8217;ve always considered the Realtor to be our customer and the seller as their customer. By helping our customers get more orders (listings), we also get more orders.</p>
<p>Just some of the ideas we&#8217;ve used.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6447</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6447</guid>
		<description>The chart is very telling Larry.  I've decided to move toward a marketing pitch that moves to the photographer helping with partnering with the agent to get listings vs. just emphasizing that the photographer helps to sell....especially in this market!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The chart is very telling Larry.  I&#8217;ve decided to move toward a marketing pitch that moves to the photographer helping with partnering with the agent to get listings vs. just emphasizing that the photographer helps to sell&#8230;.especially in this market!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6437</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6437</guid>
		<description>JR- The chart is published by an appraiser (Alan Pope) from MLS active and pending sales data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR- The chart is published by an appraiser (Alan Pope) from MLS active and pending sales data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6435</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6435</guid>
		<description>Excellent chart. I would like to publish a chart like that for my market area.
What means did you use to publish this chart?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent chart. I would like to publish a chart like that for my market area.<br />
What means did you use to publish this chart?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Good News and The Bad News For Real Estate Photographers &#183; Invest-In-Real-Estate.ExplainedOnline.Net</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6434</link>
		<dc:creator>The Good News and The Bad News For Real Estate Photographers &#183; Invest-In-Real-Estate.ExplainedOnline.Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6434</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Photography For Real Estate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Original post by Photography For Real Estate [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Good News and The Bad News For Real Estate Photographers &#183; Real-Estate.ExplainedOnline.Net</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6433</link>
		<dc:creator>The Good News and The Bad News For Real Estate Photographers &#183; Real-Estate.ExplainedOnline.Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/06/30/the-good-news-and-the-bad-news-for-real-estate-photographers/#comment-6433</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Photography For Real Estate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Original post by Photography For Real Estate [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
