<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Landmark New Features In Lightroom 2 Beta</title>
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/09/landmark-new-features-in-lightroom-2-beta/</link>
	<description>Tips and Techniques for Real Estate Photography</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/09/landmark-new-features-in-lightroom-2-beta/#comment-4970</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/09/landmark-new-features-in-lightroom-2-beta/#comment-4970</guid>
		<description>I started using Lightroom and got all excited by the new Galleries.  Then I tested it on an old PowerBook laptop with 1024x768 resolution and realised it won't display the full size image, only a small  size  450wide and no larger.  I then checked my web stats for a year and see 48.58% of visitors are using a 1024x768 resolution (not including 800x600 either!).  It now doesn't seem  worth the loading times wait if it will only go this size.  A real shame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started using Lightroom and got all excited by the new Galleries.  Then I tested it on an old PowerBook laptop with 1024&#215;768 resolution and realised it won&#8217;t display the full size image, only a small  size  450wide and no larger.  I then checked my web stats for a year and see 48.58% of visitors are using a 1024&#215;768 resolution (not including 800&#215;600 either!).  It now doesn&#8217;t seem  worth the loading times wait if it will only go this size.  A real shame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Ridley</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/09/landmark-new-features-in-lightroom-2-beta/#comment-4753</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Ridley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/09/landmark-new-features-in-lightroom-2-beta/#comment-4753</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I'm gonna be installing it for everyday use, I'll wait until it's working properly..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m gonna be installing it for everyday use, I&#8217;ll wait until it&#8217;s working properly..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Bay</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/09/landmark-new-features-in-lightroom-2-beta/#comment-4720</link>
		<dc:creator>William Bay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/09/landmark-new-features-in-lightroom-2-beta/#comment-4720</guid>
		<description>While the feature set is quite stunning, I can't see why you would consider using a beta for everyday use. I'm not even going to install until the final version comes out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the feature set is quite stunning, I can&#8217;t see why you would consider using a beta for everyday use. I&#8217;m not even going to install until the final version comes out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
