<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Releases Lightroom 2.0 Beta</title>
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/02/adobe-releases-lightroom-20-beta/</link>
	<description>Tips and Techniques for Real Estate Photography</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/02/adobe-releases-lightroom-20-beta/#comment-4536</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/02/adobe-releases-lightroom-20-beta/#comment-4536</guid>
		<description>It is VERY slow... it's a beta, I know, but still...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is VERY slow&#8230; it&#8217;s a beta, I know, but still&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles C Stirk Jr</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/02/adobe-releases-lightroom-20-beta/#comment-4518</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles C Stirk Jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/02/adobe-releases-lightroom-20-beta/#comment-4518</guid>
		<description>Adam we convert the NEF to DNG on import into Lightroom I do't know if that is a fix but just a thought ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam we convert the NEF to DNG on import into Lightroom I do&#8217;t know if that is a fix but just a thought ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles C Stirk Jr</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/02/adobe-releases-lightroom-20-beta/#comment-4517</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles C Stirk Jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/02/adobe-releases-lightroom-20-beta/#comment-4517</guid>
		<description>"Green and Blue shades are rendered accurately, but red-orange-brown"
Odd I had thought the D300 &#38; D3 were very similar .

Once we realised the in camera D3 tint or hue adjust didn't carry over to lightroom (why any one would touch these I do not know)  

We were able to dial in files just fine with the tint &#38; colour temp in Lightroom 1.3.1 v Camera Raw 4.3.1..  

My pet peeve is Lightroom print module  not functioning properly I was hoping it would be fixed by now I have the one print job I do a year . An HBA event coming up  in couple of weeks 

I was hoping Lightroom the 1.4. release would sort out the issues ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Green and Blue shades are rendered accurately, but red-orange-brown&#8221;<br />
Odd I had thought the D300 &amp; D3 were very similar .</p>
<p>Once we realised the in camera D3 tint or hue adjust didn&#8217;t carry over to lightroom (why any one would touch these I do not know)  </p>
<p>We were able to dial in files just fine with the tint &amp; colour temp in Lightroom 1.3.1 v Camera Raw 4.3.1..  </p>
<p>My pet peeve is Lightroom print module  not functioning properly I was hoping it would be fixed by now I have the one print job I do a year . An HBA event coming up  in couple of weeks </p>
<p>I was hoping Lightroom the 1.4. release would sort out the issues &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Maurer</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/02/adobe-releases-lightroom-20-beta/#comment-4499</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Maurer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/02/adobe-releases-lightroom-20-beta/#comment-4499</guid>
		<description>BTW Larry, the "Adobe Labs Lightroom site" hyperlink above has an erroneous http in the link.
ie; there are two https, and results in the inevitable 404 error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW Larry, the &#8220;Adobe Labs Lightroom site&#8221; hyperlink above has an erroneous http in the link.<br />
ie; there are two https, and results in the inevitable 404 error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Maurer</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/02/adobe-releases-lightroom-20-beta/#comment-4498</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Maurer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/02/adobe-releases-lightroom-20-beta/#comment-4498</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I'm getting jacked off with Lightroom.

The overall functionality and feature set is superb. except there is one small problem...

It cannot render Nikon NEF images as well as the in-camera JPGs.
No matter how much time your spend (waste), you cannot get accurate colour rendition involving the RED channel.  
You can tweak all you like in the HSL panel, to no avail. :-(
The same old red channel Nikon problem.

Particularly noticeable with timbers (flooring, furniture, etc) - they're just plain wrong.
It is usually rendered as a horrible brown.

I might add, this is using a D300 preset too, and goes beyond a W/B issue.
Green and Blue shades are rendered accurately, but red-orange-brown isn't.

With Nikon's own Capture NX, it isn't a problem... the colours are spot on.
What a pity Nikon can't/won't release the processing algorithm so that 3rd party vendors can process  NEFs properly.
Then again, why would they?

If Capture NX had the functionality of LR, then it would be one awesome piece of software for Nikon shooters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I&#8217;m getting jacked off with Lightroom.</p>
<p>The overall functionality and feature set is superb. except there is one small problem&#8230;</p>
<p>It cannot render Nikon NEF images as well as the in-camera JPGs.<br />
No matter how much time your spend (waste), you cannot get accurate colour rendition involving the RED channel.<br />
You can tweak all you like in the HSL panel, to no avail. <img src='http://photographyforrealestate.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
The same old red channel Nikon problem.</p>
<p>Particularly noticeable with timbers (flooring, furniture, etc) - they&#8217;re just plain wrong.<br />
It is usually rendered as a horrible brown.</p>
<p>I might add, this is using a D300 preset too, and goes beyond a W/B issue.<br />
Green and Blue shades are rendered accurately, but red-orange-brown isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>With Nikon&#8217;s own Capture NX, it isn&#8217;t a problem&#8230; the colours are spot on.<br />
What a pity Nikon can&#8217;t/won&#8217;t release the processing algorithm so that 3rd party vendors can process  NEFs properly.<br />
Then again, why would they?</p>
<p>If Capture NX had the functionality of LR, then it would be one awesome piece of software for Nikon shooters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Estate - Information on Real Estate &#187; Adobe Releases Lightroom 2.0 Beta</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/02/adobe-releases-lightroom-20-beta/#comment-4481</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Estate - Information on Real Estate &#187; Adobe Releases Lightroom 2.0 Beta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/04/02/adobe-releases-lightroom-20-beta/#comment-4481</guid>
		<description>[...] Releases Lightroom 2.0 Beta          unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThanks to Cherie Irwin for pointing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Releases Lightroom 2.0 Beta          unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThanks to Cherie Irwin for pointing [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
