<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stills: The Most Effective Way to Shoot Video For Real Estate Tours</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:19:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracey</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/comment-page-1/#comment-15847</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/#comment-15847</guid>
		<description>Wow, some people take opinions very seriously! lol

Ben, I think you may have missed a class in Making Money 101. Subcontracting to talented and reliable people can free realtors up to do their job, which is sell the house. 

Just an opinion.

; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, some people take opinions very seriously! lol</p>
<p>Ben, I think you may have missed a class in Making Money 101. Subcontracting to talented and reliable people can free realtors up to do their job, which is sell the house. </p>
<p>Just an opinion.</p>
<p>; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/comment-page-1/#comment-2985</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/#comment-2985</guid>
		<description>In regards to the Soundslides slideshow program, I recently purchased it and it is a snap to use, could not be much easier. Below are links to 2 slideshows that I created. Not related to Real Estate but they should give you a feel for the product....

http://www.creativepd.com/slideshows/brianmccullough080122/index.html

http://www.creativepd.com/slideshows/mkeimagesyearinreview2007/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the Soundslides slideshow program, I recently purchased it and it is a snap to use, could not be much easier. Below are links to 2 slideshows that I created. Not related to Real Estate but they should give you a feel for the product&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.creativepd.com/slideshows/brianmccullough080122/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.creativepd.com/slideshows/brianmccullough080122/index.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.creativepd.com/slideshows/mkeimagesyearinreview2007/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.creativepd.com/slideshows/mkeimagesyearinreview2007/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Kouijzer</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/comment-page-1/#comment-2848</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kouijzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/#comment-2848</guid>
		<description>Who the heck are people employing to make videos for them at 20x the price of a selection of stills? What is it with the world today? People are too quick to employ someone else to do what is ultimately their own job (and usually fairly easy) - If you are an agent, YOU should be recording that video, YOU should be adding audio to it, and YOU should be uploading it onto your site??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who the heck are people employing to make videos for them at 20x the price of a selection of stills? What is it with the world today? People are too quick to employ someone else to do what is ultimately their own job (and usually fairly easy) &#8211; If you are an agent, YOU should be recording that video, YOU should be adding audio to it, and YOU should be uploading it onto your site??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/comment-page-1/#comment-2703</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/#comment-2703</guid>
		<description>Adam, you are right... A video is a video. But a ken/burns style &quot;video&quot; has the big advantage of being almost a video, cheaper.

In the assumption that &quot;something is better than nothing&quot; and that a quality video budget will be the 20 times more expensive, 99% of the Realtors will pick up the &quot;video&quot;

Considering many aspects, the &quot;videos&quot; are a great marketing instrument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, you are right&#8230; A video is a video. But a ken/burns style &#8220;video&#8221; has the big advantage of being almost a video, cheaper.</p>
<p>In the assumption that &#8220;something is better than nothing&#8221; and that a quality video budget will be the 20 times more expensive, 99% of the Realtors will pick up the &#8220;video&#8221;</p>
<p>Considering many aspects, the &#8220;videos&#8221; are a great marketing instrument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Maurer</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/comment-page-1/#comment-2699</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Maurer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/#comment-2699</guid>
		<description>Stills are stills and full motion video is video.

Creating a montage of still that move around is not video, and never will be.
Personally, I think the moving stills technique is crap.
There is no change is perspective as you approach an object... it just looks wrong.

If you are going to shoot video, then you need to walk thru the house, just as you would in person... otherwise there is no point to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stills are stills and full motion video is video.</p>
<p>Creating a montage of still that move around is not video, and never will be.<br />
Personally, I think the moving stills technique is crap.<br />
There is no change is perspective as you approach an object&#8230; it just looks wrong.</p>
<p>If you are going to shoot video, then you need to walk thru the house, just as you would in person&#8230; otherwise there is no point to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/comment-page-1/#comment-2686</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/#comment-2686</guid>
		<description>Paul- agreed! Video is video... panning is not video...

I stll like a professionally done 360 panos better than video anyhow. Why do we want to sacrifice picture quality to see tree branches move?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul- agreed! Video is video&#8230; panning is not video&#8230;</p>
<p>I stll like a professionally done 360 panos better than video anyhow. Why do we want to sacrifice picture quality to see tree branches move?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/comment-page-1/#comment-2679</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/#comment-2679</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t Ken Burns slideshows still just PHOTOS?  Zooming in and out of a photo doesn&#039;t make it more compelling than a still photo - does it?  It still doesn&#039;t show the relationship between rooms like video.  It&#039;s not really video - it&#039;s just a slideshow!  Call it what it is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t Ken Burns slideshows still just PHOTOS?  Zooming in and out of a photo doesn&#8217;t make it more compelling than a still photo &#8211; does it?  It still doesn&#8217;t show the relationship between rooms like video.  It&#8217;s not really video &#8211; it&#8217;s just a slideshow!  Call it what it is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Estate/Buisness News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stills: The Most Effective Way to Shoot Video For Real Estate Tours</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/comment-page-1/#comment-2676</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Estate/Buisness News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stills: The Most Effective Way to Shoot Video For Real Estate Tours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/#comment-2676</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by larry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by larry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photo News Today &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stills: The Most Effective Way to Shoot Video For Real Estate Tours</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/comment-page-1/#comment-2675</link>
		<dc:creator>Photo News Today &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stills: The Most Effective Way to Shoot Video For Real Estate Tours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/#comment-2675</guid>
		<description>[...] Source and Read More: Photography for Real Estate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source and Read More: Photography for Real Estate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Estate &#187; Stills: The Most Effective Way to Shoot Video For Real Estate Tours</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/comment-page-1/#comment-2674</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Estate &#187; Stills: The Most Effective Way to Shoot Video For Real Estate Tours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/25/stills-the-most-effective-way-to-shoot-video-for-real-estate-tours/#comment-2674</guid>
		<description>[...] Glenn Kelman wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Glenn Kelman wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

