<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You Willing To Let Anyone Use Your flickr Photos?</title>
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/19/are-you-willing-to-let-anyone-use-your-flickr-photos/</link>
	<description>Tips and Techniques for Real Estate Photography</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: LuMaxArt</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/19/are-you-willing-to-let-anyone-use-your-flickr-photos/#comment-4387</link>
		<dc:creator>LuMaxArt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/19/are-you-willing-to-let-anyone-use-your-flickr-photos/#comment-4387</guid>
		<description>Another Perspective:

http://goldencompass.com/blog/just-because-its-free-doesnt-mean-its-yours/

By Michael Benidt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Perspective:</p>
<p><a href="http://goldencompass.com/blog/just-because-its-free-doesnt-mean-its-yours/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/goldencompass.com');">http://goldencompass.com/blog/just-because-its-free-doesnt-mean-its-yours/</a></p>
<p>By Michael Benidt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Estate - Information on Real Estate &#187; Are You Willing To Let Anyone Use Your flickr Photos?</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/19/are-you-willing-to-let-anyone-use-your-flickr-photos/#comment-2520</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Estate - Information on Real Estate &#187; Are You Willing To Let Anyone Use Your flickr Photos?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/19/are-you-willing-to-let-anyone-use-your-flickr-photos/#comment-2520</guid>
		<description>[...] You Willing To Let Anyone Use Your flickr Photos?          Greg Swann wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptAs the administrator of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] You Willing To Let Anyone Use Your flickr Photos?          Greg Swann wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptAs the administrator of the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Lacoste</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/19/are-you-willing-to-let-anyone-use-your-flickr-photos/#comment-2518</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Lacoste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/19/are-you-willing-to-let-anyone-use-your-flickr-photos/#comment-2518</guid>
		<description>Flickr doesn't change the image stealing issues. It's easier to link, to search, to find, to re-use, to show, to discuss. But fundamentally, an image can be stolen if it's diffused.

There is no real technical possibility to protect them: if you can saw them, you can copy them. Scan a book, download a jpeg, take a photo of a painting, alt-print screen a flash slideshow. It's always possible to remove a watermark if it's still possible to understand the meaning of an image.

The better way, for me, is to know who could be capable to steal your images and for what aim. For me, as a real estate agent, it's my local concurrence. It happened to me once (not from flickr but my own website), I read some case law, and now I know how to intimidate thieves.

On the other hand, flickr's sharing functions are just great: if it's not for my paid work, all my pictures are under a &lt;a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" rel="nofollow"&gt;CC attribution license&lt;/a&gt;, it's easy to adjust the license for each. And so they can be used for anything, I find that great, like &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Public_domain_image_resources" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt;. For example, some of my photos are used on a &lt;a href="http://www.sacred-destinations.com/egypt/cairo-sultan-hassan-mosque.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;touristic site&lt;/a&gt; (with attribution!) on the Sultan Hassan mosquee&lt;/a&gt; in Cairo.

I think the success of the group (and others) is bound to the sharing features of flickr. I think it wouldn't be a great idea to make it difficult for others to join.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flickr doesn&#8217;t change the image stealing issues. It&#8217;s easier to link, to search, to find, to re-use, to show, to discuss. But fundamentally, an image can be stolen if it&#8217;s diffused.</p>
<p>There is no real technical possibility to protect them: if you can saw them, you can copy them. Scan a book, download a jpeg, take a photo of a painting, alt-print screen a flash slideshow. It&#8217;s always possible to remove a watermark if it&#8217;s still possible to understand the meaning of an image.</p>
<p>The better way, for me, is to know who could be capable to steal your images and for what aim. For me, as a real estate agent, it&#8217;s my local concurrence. It happened to me once (not from flickr but my own website), I read some case law, and now I know how to intimidate thieves.</p>
<p>On the other hand, flickr&#8217;s sharing functions are just great: if it&#8217;s not for my paid work, all my pictures are under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/creativecommons.org');">CC attribution license</a>, it&#8217;s easy to adjust the license for each. And so they can be used for anything, I find that great, like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Public_domain_image_resources" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/en.wikipedia.org');">Wikipedia</a>. For example, some of my photos are used on a <a href="http://www.sacred-destinations.com/egypt/cairo-sultan-hassan-mosque.htm" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.sacred-destinations.com');">touristic site</a> (with attribution!) on the Sultan Hassan mosquee in Cairo.</p>
<p>I think the success of the group (and others) is bound to the sharing features of flickr. I think it wouldn&#8217;t be a great idea to make it difficult for others to join.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Are You Willing To Let Anyone Use Your flickr Photos?</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/19/are-you-willing-to-let-anyone-use-your-flickr-photos/#comment-2517</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Are You Willing To Let Anyone Use Your flickr Photos?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/19/are-you-willing-to-let-anyone-use-your-flickr-photos/#comment-2517</guid>
		<description>[...] gandlwoods wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptAs the administrator of the Photography for Real Estate (PFRE) flickr group I feel obligated to let everyone that is a PFRE member and posting photos to that flickr group about a dimension of flickr that is not completely obvious. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] gandlwoods wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptAs the administrator of the Photography for Real Estate (PFRE) flickr group I feel obligated to let everyone that is a PFRE member and posting photos to that flickr group about a dimension of flickr that is not completely obvious. &#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athol Kay</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/19/are-you-willing-to-let-anyone-use-your-flickr-photos/#comment-2516</link>
		<dc:creator>Athol Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2008/01/19/are-you-willing-to-let-anyone-use-your-flickr-photos/#comment-2516</guid>
		<description>Basically anything you post online, can and will be used in evidence against you...

...no hang on that's not quite right is it.

Pretty close to it though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically anything you post online, can and will be used in evidence against you&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;no hang on that&#8217;s not quite right is it.</p>
<p>Pretty close to it though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
