Comments on: Power of A Polarizer: Story Behind My New Blog Header Image

By: Renan

Renan — Mon, 04 Jul 2011 07:54:08 +0000

The link to the 360° seems to be wrong : http://http//lohrman.com/vr/busch/lake.html
Replace it with the correct one : http://lohrman.com/vr/busch/lake.html

By: Jason Lusk

Jason Lusk — Thu, 14 May 2009 00:58:12 +0000

I find that I’m using a circular polarizer on my exterior shots about half the time, mainly to bring out the sky.

By: larry

larry — Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:36:53 +0000

@Scott,
Yes, since this shoot that I was posting about I always carry a polarizer.

You are right, the polarizing effect of coarse depends on the angle of the sun so when shooting shots in all directions for use in stitching it makes no sense to use a polarizer… at the time when I didn’t realize this.

By: Scott Pruett

Scott Pruett — Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:41:11 +0000

Larry, re: polarizing a 8mm fish, you can fit a polarizer on the ring that the cap snaps to, but of course your FOV will be restricted if you shoot with it on. You may want to investigate the physics of polarization a little; it doesn’t work well for panoramas. Try it sometime w/ your 16-35.

By: Photo News Today - "All the imaging news, all the time."

Photo News Today - "All the imaging news, all the time." — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:43:14 +0000

[...] Source and Read More: Photography for Real Estate [...]

By: Drew Meyers

Drew Meyers — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:20:15 +0000

I like the new header Larry – such a great piece of photography.

By: Justin Soles

Justin Soles — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:35:18 +0000

Everything you said is very true. I think that knowing how to use filters (not just physical filters but also digital filters in PS) are just some of the tools and techniques that separate RE photographers from the typical RE agent who does their own photography. It’s a shame more agents don’t take advantage of this…