<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HDR Images For Real Estate Photography</title>
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/</link>
	<description>Tips and Techniques for Real Estate Photography</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 03:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>@Mike,
See my post from back in March of this year on how to do HDR panoramas with Photomatix:

  http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=62

This post gives two examples done with Photomatix:
  http://lohrman.com/qt/KevinLiving.htm
  as I recall each of the 3 shots had -2EV, 0, +2EV
And one stitched with one just the 0 EV images
  http://lohrman.com/qt/MyNormalPano.htm

I'm not sure what the Photomatix parameters were because Kevin created the HDR pano and I created the non-HDR pano.

On this use of HDR I like the non-header version better because the HDR version had the "grungy" look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike,<br />
See my post from back in March of this year on how to do HDR panoramas with Photomatix:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=62" rel="nofollow" >http://photographyforrealestate.net/?p=62</a></p>
<p>This post gives two examples done with Photomatix:<br />
  <a href="http://lohrman.com/qt/KevinLiving.htm" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/lohrman.com');">http://lohrman.com/qt/KevinLiving.htm</a><br />
  as I recall each of the 3 shots had -2EV, 0, +2EV<br />
And one stitched with one just the 0 EV images<br />
  <a href="http://lohrman.com/qt/MyNormalPano.htm" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/lohrman.com');">http://lohrman.com/qt/MyNormalPano.htm</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the Photomatix parameters were because Kevin created the HDR pano and I created the non-HDR pano.</p>
<p>On this use of HDR I like the non-header version better because the HDR version had the &#8220;grungy&#8221; look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Martin</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 03:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>Larry,
I have experimented with interior HDR and panoramas of same.  I have no acceptable results.  Anything you can offer or refer me to would be appreciated.  At the same time, I feel I'm getting great results for exterior shots.  So how do I create more "dymamic range" for interior photos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry,<br />
I have experimented with interior HDR and panoramas of same.  I have no acceptable results.  Anything you can offer or refer me to would be appreciated.  At the same time, I feel I&#8217;m getting great results for exterior shots.  So how do I create more &#8220;dymamic range&#8221; for interior photos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larrylohrman</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1346</link>
		<dc:creator>larrylohrman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 01:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1346</guid>
		<description>Mike,
When I stitch 3 different panos with identical images (except for exposure) and identical control points with PTgui I get 3 identical panos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
When I stitch 3 different panos with identical images (except for exposure) and identical control points with PTgui I get 3 identical panos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Martin</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1341</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1341</guid>
		<description>Larry,
Understand.  But the process is laborious.  For example, after doing three stitches (one for each exposure), I’m still not ready for HDR processing.  The resulting images aren’t exactly the same size.  Photomatix doesn’t like that.  I have to resize them to exactly match.  After that I can combine them in Photomatix.  I’d like to have one program that combines the best of pano stitching and HDR development.  I’m hoping its PTgui PRO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry,<br />
Understand.  But the process is laborious.  For example, after doing three stitches (one for each exposure), I’m still not ready for HDR processing.  The resulting images aren’t exactly the same size.  Photomatix doesn’t like that.  I have to resize them to exactly match.  After that I can combine them in Photomatix.  I’d like to have one program that combines the best of pano stitching and HDR development.  I’m hoping its PTgui PRO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larrylohrman</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>larrylohrman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>Mike,
No, you don't have to use RAW file with PTgui. Matt was just saying that you get better results if you shoot RAW because you are able to adjust things like white-balance, exposure before you start stitching.

PTgui will take jpg as input.

Also, you don't need PTgui PRO to do HDR panoramas. All you need to do is to do 3 stitches of your images: one on each of -2 set, normal set and +2 set resulting in 3 panos then use Photomatix on the 3 panos. I've done that a lot with blending and masking but it will work with Photomatix too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
No, you don&#8217;t have to use RAW file with PTgui. Matt was just saying that you get better results if you shoot RAW because you are able to adjust things like white-balance, exposure before you start stitching.</p>
<p>PTgui will take jpg as input.</p>
<p>Also, you don&#8217;t need PTgui PRO to do HDR panoramas. All you need to do is to do 3 stitches of your images: one on each of -2 set, normal set and +2 set resulting in 3 panos then use Photomatix on the 3 panos. I&#8217;ve done that a lot with blending and masking but it will work with Photomatix too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Martin</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1344</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1344</guid>
		<description>Larry,
Using RAW files currently isn't an option for me.  I'm very interested in your review/opinions about PTgui PRO.  I'm confused about whether its OK to shoot everyting as jpg files.  Or is it really necessary to start with TIFF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry,<br />
Using RAW files currently isn&#8217;t an option for me.  I&#8217;m very interested in your review/opinions about PTgui PRO.  I&#8217;m confused about whether its OK to shoot everyting as jpg files.  Or is it really necessary to start with TIFF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1345</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1345</guid>
		<description>We did quite a few direct comparisons between HDR and RAW when working on the tour at http://www.esitetours.com/27188302/ and found that we wound up getting the best results with the RAW files. We just weren't able to tweak the color and lighting enough in Photomatix to get realistic enough coloration.  The main exceptions would be for exterior tours at twilight where you capture the interior lights through the windows or rooms with large windows that could be potentially washed out in sunlight. In the future, we will most likely be using RAW for 90% our 360s. You can always adjust the exposure in a raw converter and throw them into Photomatix after the fact. We find, however that lowering the exposure and bumping up the fill light in the raw converter typically will create a similar, more accurate look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We did quite a few direct comparisons between HDR and RAW when working on the tour at <a href="http://www.esitetours.com/27188302/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.esitetours.com');">http://www.esitetours.com/27188302/</a> and found that we wound up getting the best results with the RAW files. We just weren&#8217;t able to tweak the color and lighting enough in Photomatix to get realistic enough coloration.  The main exceptions would be for exterior tours at twilight where you capture the interior lights through the windows or rooms with large windows that could be potentially washed out in sunlight. In the future, we will most likely be using RAW for 90% our 360s. You can always adjust the exposure in a raw converter and throw them into Photomatix after the fact. We find, however that lowering the exposure and bumping up the fill light in the raw converter typically will create a similar, more accurate look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larrylohrman</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1338</link>
		<dc:creator>larrylohrman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1338</guid>
		<description>Mike,
I can tell you more after I upgrade my 3 year old version of PTgui to PTgui Pro (probably this weekend). Kevin at esitetours.com that I did a post on a few days ago uses the HDR features in PTgui PRO to do his tours (for example: http://www.esitetours.com/27188302/ as well as all the other examples on his site is done with PTgui PRO). Kevin says he likes it but it doesn't have as many option slides as Photomatix.

I believe you can get a trial version of PTgui Pro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
I can tell you more after I upgrade my 3 year old version of PTgui to PTgui Pro (probably this weekend). Kevin at esitetours.com that I did a post on a few days ago uses the HDR features in PTgui PRO to do his tours (for example: <a href="http://www.esitetours.com/27188302/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.esitetours.com');">http://www.esitetours.com/27188302/</a> as well as all the other examples on his site is done with PTgui PRO). Kevin says he likes it but it doesn&#8217;t have as many option slides as Photomatix.</p>
<p>I believe you can get a trial version of PTgui Pro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Martin</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1336</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1336</guid>
		<description>I have been using Photomatix Pro and think it it great for external shots.  I have not been able to combine it well with panoramas for external or internal shots.  I'd like opinions about the virtues of PTgui Pro.  Will it really do HDR of panos?  By this I mean: I want to take three shots of each frame at different exposures.  Then I want PTgui Pro (without much help) to do the stitching and HDR tone mapping and give me a great result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Photomatix Pro and think it it great for external shots.  I have not been able to combine it well with panoramas for external or internal shots.  I&#8217;d like opinions about the virtues of PTgui Pro.  Will it really do HDR of panos?  By this I mean: I want to take three shots of each frame at different exposures.  Then I want PTgui Pro (without much help) to do the stitching and HDR tone mapping and give me a great result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe noel</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1343</link>
		<dc:creator>joe noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/27/hdr-images-for-real-estate-photography/#comment-1343</guid>
		<description>I like many others have fallen into the deep hole of HDR its almost like an addiction making me see in HDR most of the time. this technique is especially useful for exteriors. once i figured it out and got some decent software it is the only way to shoot especially pairing it with raw files converted to .dng in lightroom. i have used it inside many times but do not always get great results. but shooting for a decent exposure and then processing it as a single file HDR is always helpful too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like many others have fallen into the deep hole of HDR its almost like an addiction making me see in HDR most of the time. this technique is especially useful for exteriors. once i figured it out and got some decent software it is the only way to shoot especially pairing it with raw files converted to .dng in lightroom. i have used it inside many times but do not always get great results. but shooting for a decent exposure and then processing it as a single file HDR is always helpful too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
