<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sharpening in Real Estate Photography Workflow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/01/sharpening-in-real-estate-photography-workflow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/01/sharpening-in-real-estate-photography-workflow/</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:04:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon May</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/01/sharpening-in-real-estate-photography-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 02:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=204#comment-1274</guid>
		<description>I get the feeling that, like sharpening, de-noising (Noise Ninja &amp; co) should be a process best applied after final downsizing. I always thought that de-noising had a smoothing effect which required subsequent sharpening, but Noise Ninja (a recent purchase for me) seems to smooth and sharpen in one go (softens hands AND piney fresh!). AT least, it has the apparent effect of sharpening. I haven&#039;t compared NN and UM side be side on copies of the same image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get the feeling that, like sharpening, de-noising (Noise Ninja &amp; co) should be a process best applied after final downsizing. I always thought that de-noising had a smoothing effect which required subsequent sharpening, but Noise Ninja (a recent purchase for me) seems to smooth and sharpen in one go (softens hands AND piney fresh!). AT least, it has the apparent effect of sharpening. I haven&#8217;t compared NN and UM side be side on copies of the same image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Stec</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/01/sharpening-in-real-estate-photography-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Stec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=204#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>Matt Kloskowsky at photoshop professionals and Lightroom killer tips praises the Lightroom&#039;s sharpening not to mention resampling of images claiming it&#039;s superiority to PS&#039;s algoritms, so I guess it&#039;s like in parliament... 10 people, 15 opinions...

regards
__
Matt Stec Photography - www.shotz4U.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt Kloskowsky at photoshop professionals and Lightroom killer tips praises the Lightroom&#8217;s sharpening not to mention resampling of images claiming it&#8217;s superiority to PS&#8217;s algoritms, so I guess it&#8217;s like in parliament&#8230; 10 people, 15 opinions&#8230;</p>
<p>regards<br />
__<br />
Matt Stec Photography &#8211; <a href="http://www.shotz4U.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.shotz4U.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larrylohrman</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/01/sharpening-in-real-estate-photography-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>larrylohrman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=204#comment-1275</guid>
		<description>Matt,
I think you are right... Martin Evening&#039;s book on pg 8 suggests that &quot;fixing the image data as a pixel image&quot; happens last. This must be the same for exporting.

Thanks for keeping me straight.

However, I&#039;ve always been a little disappointed with Lightroom sharpening. Chris Orwig that wrote the Photoshop User article I referred to and does the lynda.com videos agrees that &quot;Photosho Sharpening is best&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,<br />
I think you are right&#8230; Martin Evening&#8217;s book on pg 8 suggests that &#8220;fixing the image data as a pixel image&#8221; happens last. This must be the same for exporting.</p>
<p>Thanks for keeping me straight.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;ve always been a little disappointed with Lightroom sharpening. Chris Orwig that wrote the Photoshop User article I referred to and does the lynda.com videos agrees that &#8220;Photosho Sharpening is best&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Stec</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/11/01/sharpening-in-real-estate-photography-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Stec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=204#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>Larry, did you come across any documentation of Lightroom saying that resizing images is applied as the last in the process of export. I would have thought that someone in Adobe thought of that to make sharpening the last command after reducing pixel size of the image, otherwise quite good implementation of sharpening tool in LR 1.1 is useless if it needs to be redone after exporting image. After all the only way to get an image processed by Lightroom whether it is being resized or not is to export it to whatever format you want.

Regards
__
Matt Stec Photography - www.shotz4U.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, did you come across any documentation of Lightroom saying that resizing images is applied as the last in the process of export. I would have thought that someone in Adobe thought of that to make sharpening the last command after reducing pixel size of the image, otherwise quite good implementation of sharpening tool in LR 1.1 is useless if it needs to be redone after exporting image. After all the only way to get an image processed by Lightroom whether it is being resized or not is to export it to whatever format you want.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
__<br />
Matt Stec Photography &#8211; <a href="http://www.shotz4U.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.shotz4U.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

