Comments on: Professional Photographers Prefer Lightroom Over Aperture http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/10/19/professional-photographers-prefer-lightroom-over-aperture/ Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful Thu, 24 May 2012 23:55:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: true70 » Professional Photographers Prefer Lightroom Over Aperture http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/10/19/professional-photographers-prefer-lightroom-over-aperture/comment-page-1/#comment-1237 true70 » Professional Photographers Prefer Lightroom Over Aperture Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:20:50 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=193#comment-1237 [...] sourced here [...] [...] sourced here [...]

]]> By: shaun mclane http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/10/19/professional-photographers-prefer-lightroom-over-aperture/comment-page-1/#comment-1238 shaun mclane Sat, 20 Oct 2007 17:50:17 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=193#comment-1238 I tried Aperture, and LR, and even though I'm a huge Apple fan, LR just seems to handle the load better for me. I tried Aperture, and LR, and even though I’m a huge Apple fan, LR just seems to handle the load better for me.

]]> By: Adam Maurer http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/10/19/professional-photographers-prefer-lightroom-over-aperture/comment-page-1/#comment-1239 Adam Maurer Sat, 20 Oct 2007 07:42:36 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=193#comment-1239 I was using Adobe Camera Raw as RAW images were being dragged into Photochop for PP. Often, it was difficult to maintain colour balance between multiple images of the same scene. Enter Lightroom. I have been using this exclusively as the front end, and it's wonderful. In additon to tweaking WB, exposure, upping the vibrance, sat, etc, it's so easy to compare shots, rate shots, and choose the keepers. I have this system where I assign a star value: 5 Stars: 4:3 that can be exported as a JPG directly with no further PP 4 Stars: 3:2 from dSLR, or 4:3 image that requires Photoshop tweaks 3 Stars: Part of a pano sequence, export as TIF for PTGUI 2 Stars: Review and see if there is anything better Being able to sort images depending on star rating (or you can use colour ratings as well) really helps with the workflow. It was a dog to learn, but well worth the effort. 5 Stars to Lightroom! :-) I was using Adobe Camera Raw as RAW images were being dragged into Photochop for PP.
Often, it was difficult to maintain colour balance between multiple images of the same scene.

Enter Lightroom.
I have been using this exclusively as the front end, and it’s wonderful.
In additon to tweaking WB, exposure, upping the vibrance, sat, etc, it’s so easy to compare shots, rate shots, and choose the keepers.

I have this system where I assign a star value:
5 Stars: 4:3 that can be exported as a JPG directly with no further PP
4 Stars: 3:2 from dSLR, or 4:3 image that requires Photoshop tweaks
3 Stars: Part of a pano sequence, export as TIF for PTGUI
2 Stars: Review and see if there is anything better

Being able to sort images depending on star rating (or you can use colour ratings as well) really helps with the workflow.

It was a dog to learn, but well worth the effort.
5 Stars to Lightroom! :-)

]]>