<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash Panorama v2.2 Player Looks as Good as QuickTimeVR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/10/16/flash-panorama-v22-player-looks-as-good-as-quicktimevr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/10/16/flash-panorama-v22-player-looks-as-good-as-quicktimevr/</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:35:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tusk</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/10/16/flash-panorama-v22-player-looks-as-good-as-quicktimevr/comment-page-1/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator>Tusk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=191#comment-1225</guid>
		<description>Mmm... that&#039;s IF you can get your head around Denis&#039;confusing &#039;tutorials&#039;. I&#039;m a newcomer to FPP &amp; despite shelling out for his software, am yet to produce my first tour. No real help from him either..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm&#8230; that&#8217;s IF you can get your head around Denis&#8217;confusing &#8216;tutorials&#8217;. I&#8217;m a newcomer to FPP &amp; despite shelling out for his software, am yet to produce my first tour. No real help from him either..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larrylohrman</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/10/16/flash-panorama-v22-player-looks-as-good-as-quicktimevr/comment-page-1/#comment-1226</link>
		<dc:creator>larrylohrman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=191#comment-1226</guid>
		<description>Jeff,
I&#039;ve tried both here is an Immervision one:

  http://www.lohrman.com/vr/tree/tree.html

I think the quality is very close although it is very difficult to compare accurately unless the two different players have  exactly the same input file.

Immervision had the nice little navigation bar at the bottom. Immervision is more complex to setup.

A major factor is which stitcher you use and what file format it puts out.

Immervision images are encoded so they are more difficult to steal if thats an issue.

I&#039;ve haven&#039;t decided yet which I&#039;m going to use for my tours.

I&#039;m leaning towards Immervision just because of the nav bar at the bottom.. it may be easier for users to find their way back from fullscreen to the tour page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,<br />
I&#8217;ve tried both here is an Immervision one:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.lohrman.com/vr/tree/tree.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lohrman.com/vr/tree/tree.html</a></p>
<p>I think the quality is very close although it is very difficult to compare accurately unless the two different players have  exactly the same input file.</p>
<p>Immervision had the nice little navigation bar at the bottom. Immervision is more complex to setup.</p>
<p>A major factor is which stitcher you use and what file format it puts out.</p>
<p>Immervision images are encoded so they are more difficult to steal if thats an issue.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve haven&#8217;t decided yet which I&#8217;m going to use for my tours.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m leaning towards Immervision just because of the nav bar at the bottom.. it may be easier for users to find their way back from fullscreen to the tour page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Titcomb</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/10/16/flash-panorama-v22-player-looks-as-good-as-quicktimevr/comment-page-1/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Titcomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=191#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>Anyone have any opinions on Pure Player for Flash by Immervision vs. Flash Panorama v2.2? Looking for the best solution to replace Quicktime as penetration isn&#039;t good enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone have any opinions on Pure Player for Flash by Immervision vs. Flash Panorama v2.2? Looking for the best solution to replace Quicktime as penetration isn&#8217;t good enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photo News Today &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Flash Panorama v2.2 Player Looks as Good as QuickTimeVR</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/10/16/flash-panorama-v22-player-looks-as-good-as-quicktimevr/comment-page-1/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>Photo News Today &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Flash Panorama v2.2 Player Looks as Good as QuickTimeVR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=191#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>[...] Source and Read More: Photography for Real Estate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source and Read More: Photography for Real Estate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

