<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simpleviewer an Alternative Simpler Slide-Show Template for Lightroom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/09/28/simpleviewer-an-alternative-simpler-slide-show-template-for-lightroom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/09/28/simpleviewer-an-alternative-simpler-slide-show-template-for-lightroom/</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:19:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: asiavr</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/09/28/simpleviewer-an-alternative-simpler-slide-show-template-for-lightroom/comment-page-1/#comment-1120</link>
		<dc:creator>asiavr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 03:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=178#comment-1120</guid>
		<description>i m the simpleplayer user. very good and easy to use.
combining with picasa, you don&#039;t need any computer knowledge at all.

cheers
asiavr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i m the simpleplayer user. very good and easy to use.<br />
combining with picasa, you don&#8217;t need any computer knowledge at all.</p>
<p>cheers<br />
asiavr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Dhaem</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/09/28/simpleviewer-an-alternative-simpler-slide-show-template-for-lightroom/comment-page-1/#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>James Dhaem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=178#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>check out dfgallery

my example
http://lowellharvestparade.dvd-tour.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>check out dfgallery</p>
<p>my example<br />
<a href="http://lowellharvestparade.dvd-tour.com/" rel="nofollow">http://lowellharvestparade.dvd-tour.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenn Goutal</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/09/28/simpleviewer-an-alternative-simpler-slide-show-template-for-lightroom/comment-page-1/#comment-1124</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenn Goutal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=178#comment-1124</guid>
		<description>I am afraid I have to agree with Levi.

The monoslideshow *is* elegant and simple in that it just starts right up and takes off without requiring any interaction beyond the first click.
But that&#039;s exactly the problem -- it takes off before I&#039;m ready, and goes at its own pace, without reference to the pace at which I want to view it;
and, indeed, there is no hint as to how to make it stop,
short of using the browser&#039;s own &quot;Back&quot; button.
Beyond that, I found the &quot;transitions&quot; upon displaying each new image made me a little seasick;
all that up-and-down motion really got to me.
Regardless of whether the motion was a X, Y, or combination translation, or a zoom in or out,
it was distracting from the actual images.
I realize that that may not be a built-in feature of the software;
it may be just how you happened to configure this particular presentation.
Also, and I&#039;m guessing that this *is* a feature of the software, and not your personal choice,
monoslideshow required me to maximize my browser window, i.e. cover my entire monitor;
otherwise, part of the image(s) was cut off at the bottom.
The image(s) didn&#039;t resize themselves to fit the browser window that I as user am happy with.
As a viewer, I really dislike a site that does this, and will tend to avoid it.

Simpleviewer is, yes, a little clunky by today&#039;s standards,
which may say more about the inappropriateness of today&#039;s standards
than about the fitness of that software for its purpose.
I found the interface quite intuitive based on my particular experience of the web --
there&#039;s obviously a large image with a bunch of small images off to one side,
so it seems clear that the little images are &quot;thumbnails&quot; of a set of images to be viewed.
Clicking on any of the thumbnails does indeed immediately display a large version of the image.
The image comes up quickly, without a lot of distracting fanfare,
and the experience is entirely viewer-paced and viewer-ordered.
The one thing that did confuse me was the big arrowhead;
my first expectation was that it would start a slide show;
I was surprised when, instead, it merely &quot;paged&quot; to a different set of thumbnails.
But once I realized that, it was fine.

In regard to your comment to Linda --
It&#039;s too bad you (and we) don&#039;t have an interface that allows both.
There *are* such interfaces; they&#039;re just not specifically intended for real estate.
I think that the ideal would be a place for a main image
(that resizes itself according to the current size of the window)
and a set of the most obvious buttons underneath (or somewhere)
for First, Previous, Next, Last, Play, and Stop, and perhaps a Rate control,
probably calibrated in seconds per image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am afraid I have to agree with Levi.</p>
<p>The monoslideshow *is* elegant and simple in that it just starts right up and takes off without requiring any interaction beyond the first click.<br />
But that&#8217;s exactly the problem &#8212; it takes off before I&#8217;m ready, and goes at its own pace, without reference to the pace at which I want to view it;<br />
and, indeed, there is no hint as to how to make it stop,<br />
short of using the browser&#8217;s own &#8220;Back&#8221; button.<br />
Beyond that, I found the &#8220;transitions&#8221; upon displaying each new image made me a little seasick;<br />
all that up-and-down motion really got to me.<br />
Regardless of whether the motion was a X, Y, or combination translation, or a zoom in or out,<br />
it was distracting from the actual images.<br />
I realize that that may not be a built-in feature of the software;<br />
it may be just how you happened to configure this particular presentation.<br />
Also, and I&#8217;m guessing that this *is* a feature of the software, and not your personal choice,<br />
monoslideshow required me to maximize my browser window, i.e. cover my entire monitor;<br />
otherwise, part of the image(s) was cut off at the bottom.<br />
The image(s) didn&#8217;t resize themselves to fit the browser window that I as user am happy with.<br />
As a viewer, I really dislike a site that does this, and will tend to avoid it.</p>
<p>Simpleviewer is, yes, a little clunky by today&#8217;s standards,<br />
which may say more about the inappropriateness of today&#8217;s standards<br />
than about the fitness of that software for its purpose.<br />
I found the interface quite intuitive based on my particular experience of the web &#8211;<br />
there&#8217;s obviously a large image with a bunch of small images off to one side,<br />
so it seems clear that the little images are &#8220;thumbnails&#8221; of a set of images to be viewed.<br />
Clicking on any of the thumbnails does indeed immediately display a large version of the image.<br />
The image comes up quickly, without a lot of distracting fanfare,<br />
and the experience is entirely viewer-paced and viewer-ordered.<br />
The one thing that did confuse me was the big arrowhead;<br />
my first expectation was that it would start a slide show;<br />
I was surprised when, instead, it merely &#8220;paged&#8221; to a different set of thumbnails.<br />
But once I realized that, it was fine.</p>
<p>In regard to your comment to Linda &#8211;<br />
It&#8217;s too bad you (and we) don&#8217;t have an interface that allows both.<br />
There *are* such interfaces; they&#8217;re just not specifically intended for real estate.<br />
I think that the ideal would be a place for a main image<br />
(that resizes itself according to the current size of the window)<br />
and a set of the most obvious buttons underneath (or somewhere)<br />
for First, Previous, Next, Last, Play, and Stop, and perhaps a Rate control,<br />
probably calibrated in seconds per image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larrylohrman</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/09/28/simpleviewer-an-alternative-simpler-slide-show-template-for-lightroom/comment-page-1/#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>larrylohrman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=178#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>@Linda
Simpleviewer does not auto-run... the user has to step through the photos by clicking on the thumbnails. Some would say this is one of it&#039;s strengths. Some advocate that it&#039;s better to have the whole tour be automatic (like monoslideshow) and some think viewers are not happy that they don&#039;t have control or it&#039;s not easy to see how to take control of the show.

@Aaron
Before my experience using monoslideshow on a listing I would have argued with you but not today. Simple is the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Linda<br />
Simpleviewer does not auto-run&#8230; the user has to step through the photos by clicking on the thumbnails. Some would say this is one of it&#8217;s strengths. Some advocate that it&#8217;s better to have the whole tour be automatic (like monoslideshow) and some think viewers are not happy that they don&#8217;t have control or it&#8217;s not easy to see how to take control of the show.</p>
<p>@Aaron<br />
Before my experience using monoslideshow on a listing I would have argued with you but not today. Simple is the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/09/28/simpleviewer-an-alternative-simpler-slide-show-template-for-lightroom/comment-page-1/#comment-1122</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=178#comment-1122</guid>
		<description>I like that monoslideshow is an autorun show. Is simpleviewer supposed to do the same or is it client controlled switching of the images?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that monoslideshow is an autorun show. Is simpleviewer supposed to do the same or is it client controlled switching of the images?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaronleitz</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/09/28/simpleviewer-an-alternative-simpler-slide-show-template-for-lightroom/comment-page-1/#comment-1125</link>
		<dc:creator>aaronleitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 03:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=178#comment-1125</guid>
		<description>I have yet to see a more flexible, simple and elegant flash gallery than simpleviewer. Monoslideshow is pretty good but I like Simpleviewer better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have yet to see a more flexible, simple and elegant flash gallery than simpleviewer. Monoslideshow is pretty good but I like Simpleviewer better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

