Comments on: And Wed Was Nikon Day – A Full Frame Nikon! http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/08/24/and-wed-was-nikon-day-a-full-frame-nikon/ Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful Thu, 24 May 2012 14:11:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: David Palermo http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/08/24/and-wed-was-nikon-day-a-full-frame-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-968 David Palermo Sat, 25 Aug 2007 17:34:03 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=157#comment-968 I have read that in the D3 noise is almost undetectable until you get up to about ISO 6400! Sounds too good to be true. I recently switched from Nikon to Canon for 3 reasons. 1. Full frame 2. Canon's 24mm TS-E lens, and 3. Low image noise. If Nikon can provide me with a better solution than Canon I will gladly switch back but I really like Canon's 24mm TS-E lens and Nikon doesn't offer a wide angle Tilt Shift lens. David I have read that in the D3 noise is almost undetectable until you get up to about ISO 6400! Sounds too good to be true.

I recently switched from Nikon to Canon for 3 reasons. 1. Full frame 2. Canon’s 24mm TS-E lens, and 3. Low image noise. If Nikon can provide me with a better solution than Canon I will gladly switch back but I really like Canon’s 24mm TS-E lens and Nikon doesn’t offer a wide angle Tilt Shift lens.

David

]]> By: David Palermo http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/08/24/and-wed-was-nikon-day-a-full-frame-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-967 David Palermo Sat, 25 Aug 2007 17:32:11 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=157#comment-967 The new CMOS chip Nikon is using in the D3 wasn't made by Sony. From what I have read it's a Nikon-developed CMOS sensor. Nikon also uses it's own chip technology in the D2H and D2Hs according to dpreview.com. So this should be interesting. I have also read that in the D3 noise is almost undetectable until you get up to about ISO 6400! Sounds too good to be true. I recently switched from Nikon to Canon for 3 reasons. 1. Full frame 2. Canon's 24mm TS-E lens, and 3. Low image noise. If Nikon can provide me with a better solution than Canon I will gladly switch back but I really like Canon's 24mm TS-E lens and Nikon doesn't offer a wide angle Tilt Shift lens. David The new CMOS chip Nikon is using in the D3 wasn’t made by Sony. From what I have read it’s a Nikon-developed CMOS sensor. Nikon also uses it’s own chip technology in the D2H and D2Hs according to dpreview.com. So this should be interesting. I have also read that in the D3 noise is almost undetectable until you get up to about ISO 6400! Sounds too good to be true.

I recently switched from Nikon to Canon for 3 reasons. 1. Full frame 2. Canon’s 24mm TS-E lens, and 3. Low image noise. If Nikon can provide me with a better solution than Canon I will gladly switch back but I really like Canon’s 24mm TS-E lens and Nikon doesn’t offer a wide angle Tilt Shift lens.

David

]]> By: mvus http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/08/24/and-wed-was-nikon-day-a-full-frame-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-966 mvus Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:37:40 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=157#comment-966 You'd have to get the sigma 12-24mm to use on the D3 as the sigma 10-20mm isn't designed for full frame sensors. You’d have to get the sigma 12-24mm to use on the D3 as the sigma 10-20mm isn’t designed for full frame sensors.

]]> By: Justin Soles http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/08/24/and-wed-was-nikon-day-a-full-frame-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-965 Justin Soles Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:21:46 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=157#comment-965 Actually, why bother spending money on the new 14-24 lens when you can reuse an older wide-angle lens with the full-frame Nikon DSLR? Still, having a true 10-20mm w/the Sigma will be really sweet! Actually, why bother spending money on the new 14-24 lens when you can reuse an older wide-angle lens with the full-frame Nikon DSLR? Still, having a true 10-20mm w/the Sigma will be really sweet!

]]> By: Raye Bellinger http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/08/24/and-wed-was-nikon-day-a-full-frame-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-969 Raye Bellinger Sat, 25 Aug 2007 03:15:15 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=157#comment-969 So much for the full frame argument.... So much for the full frame argument….

]]> By: aaronleitz http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/08/24/and-wed-was-nikon-day-a-full-frame-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-971 aaronleitz Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:42:44 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=157#comment-971 The 14-24 f2.8 looks very juicy indeed! The 14-24 f2.8 looks very juicy indeed!

]]> By: sworlando http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/08/24/and-wed-was-nikon-day-a-full-frame-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-970 sworlando Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:54:24 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=157#comment-970 The D3 and the 14-24 will cost around $7,000 but sounds like something I need to have. Then again the Canon 5D and 14mm will only cost around $4,500 but I really like the Nikon stuff. The D3 and the 14-24 will cost around $7,000 but sounds like something I need to have. Then again the Canon 5D and 14mm will only cost around $4,500 but I really like the Nikon stuff.

]]> By: Tim Thompson http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/08/24/and-wed-was-nikon-day-a-full-frame-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-964 Tim Thompson Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:06:13 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=157#comment-964 More goodies to spend money on! That 14-24 sounds like a great lens even paired with the new D300. The self-cleaning sensor sounds interesting also. More goodies to spend money on! That 14-24 sounds like a great lens even paired with the new D300. The self-cleaning sensor sounds interesting also.

]]>