<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real Estate Photographer Opportunity in Marin County, CA</title>
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/06/19/real-estate-photographer-oppurtunity-in-marin-county-ca/</link>
	<description>Tips and Techniques for Real Estate Photography</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Stec</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/06/19/real-estate-photographer-oppurtunity-in-marin-county-ca/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Stec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 05:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/06/19/real-estate-photographer-oppurtunity-in-marin-county-ca/#comment-678</guid>
		<description>I've seen it few times: "must own a PC, not Mac" As I'm just happily switching to Mac I see it somewhat ridiculous unless the company provides you with some sort of a pano stitching software specifically designed and available only on a PC platform... luckily I'll have best of both worlds with PBPC2D. but that makes me think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen it few times: &#8220;must own a PC, not Mac&#8221; As I&#8217;m just happily switching to Mac I see it somewhat ridiculous unless the company provides you with some sort of a pano stitching software specifically designed and available only on a PC platform&#8230; luckily I&#8217;ll have best of both worlds with PBPC2D. but that makes me think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Soles</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/06/19/real-estate-photographer-oppurtunity-in-marin-county-ca/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Soles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/06/19/real-estate-photographer-oppurtunity-in-marin-county-ca/#comment-677</guid>
		<description>This part made me go &lt;i&gt;"Hmmm..."&lt;/i&gt;:
"If you have the above items and are interested please send me some samples of your architectural photography. (If you don’t have any, just take a few building shots and a few inside shots that include windows.)"

So if the only thing I need to know how to do is take "...a few building shots and a few inside shots that include windows.", what's the advantage to the agent of paying me vs. doing it themselves? We'll probably both do an equally terrible job but the agent will save themselves a hundred bucks or so.

Am I missing something here?

Justin

PS: As far as panoramas go, I'm still not seeing this used widely in real estate listings b/c of competiting player standards (QT vs. Java vs. everything else). Maybe this is their gimmick, but as a realtor I can't use it in any other advertising media except the web (and usually not even on MLS).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This part made me go <i>&#8220;Hmmm&#8230;&#8221;</i>:<br />
&#8220;If you have the above items and are interested please send me some samples of your architectural photography. (If you don’t have any, just take a few building shots and a few inside shots that include windows.)&#8221;</p>
<p>So if the only thing I need to know how to do is take &#8220;&#8230;a few building shots and a few inside shots that include windows.&#8221;, what&#8217;s the advantage to the agent of paying me vs. doing it themselves? We&#8217;ll probably both do an equally terrible job but the agent will save themselves a hundred bucks or so.</p>
<p>Am I missing something here?</p>
<p>Justin</p>
<p>PS: As far as panoramas go, I&#8217;m still not seeing this used widely in real estate listings b/c of competiting player standards (QT vs. Java vs. everything else). Maybe this is their gimmick, but as a realtor I can&#8217;t use it in any other advertising media except the web (and usually not even on MLS).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Reibman</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/06/19/real-estate-photographer-oppurtunity-in-marin-county-ca/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Reibman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 05:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/06/19/real-estate-photographer-oppurtunity-in-marin-county-ca/#comment-676</guid>
		<description>Can't have a Mac? That's a deal breaker for me. Guess I'm not moving to SF!

Before I got my own business going I considered previewfirst.com. They're in the business of creating a larger company by sort of franchising their business (you generate the leads according to their marketing strategy, script, etc) It seemed somewhat appealing at the time but once you get your own clients their's no comparison. I can certainly see it as an opportunity to make big bucks by starting your own company and doing this on a large scale. Not my thing though, but their is an opportunity that some are capitalizing on. I was amazed at the number of shoots that their photographers can supposedly do per day. Not that much money, but based on volume you could make decent money but you'd have to work like a squirrel on speed...and for peanuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t have a Mac? That&#8217;s a deal breaker for me. Guess I&#8217;m not moving to SF!</p>
<p>Before I got my own business going I considered previewfirst.com. They&#8217;re in the business of creating a larger company by sort of franchising their business (you generate the leads according to their marketing strategy, script, etc) It seemed somewhat appealing at the time but once you get your own clients their&#8217;s no comparison. I can certainly see it as an opportunity to make big bucks by starting your own company and doing this on a large scale. Not my thing though, but their is an opportunity that some are capitalizing on. I was amazed at the number of shoots that their photographers can supposedly do per day. Not that much money, but based on volume you could make decent money but you&#8217;d have to work like a squirrel on speed&#8230;and for peanuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Weinheimer</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/06/19/real-estate-photographer-oppurtunity-in-marin-county-ca/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Weinheimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/06/19/real-estate-photographer-oppurtunity-in-marin-county-ca/#comment-675</guid>
		<description>better but still not quite what it should be..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>better but still not quite what it should be..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
