<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photomatix HDR For Problem Exteriors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/27/photomatix-hdr-for-problem-exteriors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/27/photomatix-hdr-for-problem-exteriors/</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:55:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Reibman</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/27/photomatix-hdr-for-problem-exteriors/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Reibman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 15:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=101#comment-524</guid>
		<description>Yes, you may even &#039;boldly&#039; suggest. Thanks for the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you may even &#8216;boldly&#8217; suggest. Thanks for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Hargis</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/27/photomatix-hdr-for-problem-exteriors/comment-page-1/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hargis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 14:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=101#comment-523</guid>
		<description>You know, I&#039;ve been really, really lucky on this score -- I have had exactly 2 deadbeat clients, one of whom I wanted to &quot;fire&quot; anyway. My best client disappeared for about 5 weeks once, and was in arrears on a shoot, but when she surfaced, she paid the old invoice, the shoot I was doing for her that day, and booked another, paid in advance. So all was forgiven.

On another note - can I meekly suggest that we move these ongoing discussions over to Flicker, where it&#039;s easier to keep track? A lot of this stuff would be best discussed on the Flicker Photo Business forum, where there are lots of pro photogs with opinions.
http://www.flickr.com/groups/photobusinessforum/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I&#8217;ve been really, really lucky on this score &#8212; I have had exactly 2 deadbeat clients, one of whom I wanted to &#8220;fire&#8221; anyway. My best client disappeared for about 5 weeks once, and was in arrears on a shoot, but when she surfaced, she paid the old invoice, the shoot I was doing for her that day, and booked another, paid in advance. So all was forgiven.</p>
<p>On another note &#8211; can I meekly suggest that we move these ongoing discussions over to Flicker, where it&#8217;s easier to keep track? A lot of this stuff would be best discussed on the Flicker Photo Business forum, where there are lots of pro photogs with opinions.<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/photobusinessforum/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/groups/photobusinessforum/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Reibman</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/27/photomatix-hdr-for-problem-exteriors/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Reibman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 06:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=101#comment-525</guid>
		<description>&#039;To the point of being ridiculous&#039; is exactly the phrase I&#039;d use to describe it. How about a 75-80% foot dragging, beyond two weeks? And I agree, we work really hard to make things go smoothly for them by getting the photos to them fast. As I get busier, I know which realtors I&#039;ll jump through hoops for to get the photos for them or schedule a shoot, and which ones I won&#039;t. But I have started asking for payment at the shoot now, accept for my trusted clients who are prompt. BTW, one of my regular cliens always brings a check to the shoot and sent me a check once, in advance of the shoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;To the point of being ridiculous&#8217; is exactly the phrase I&#8217;d use to describe it. How about a 75-80% foot dragging, beyond two weeks? And I agree, we work really hard to make things go smoothly for them by getting the photos to them fast. As I get busier, I know which realtors I&#8217;ll jump through hoops for to get the photos for them or schedule a shoot, and which ones I won&#8217;t. But I have started asking for payment at the shoot now, accept for my trusted clients who are prompt. BTW, one of my regular cliens always brings a check to the shoot and sent me a check once, in advance of the shoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cherie Irwin</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/27/photomatix-hdr-for-problem-exteriors/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Cherie Irwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 02:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=101#comment-527</guid>
		<description>I hear you!  I just decided to do the same thing.  I have a credit card authorization form that I have my clients fill out, before their first shoot.  They check a box that allows me to keep their credit card number on file so that can I bill their credit card at the time that I deliver their photos.  It works alot like when a hotel or rental car company takes your credit card number as a deposit when you make a reservation. It costs me a little more, but I&#039;d rather pay around 1.75% in processing fees instead of having to deal with depositing checks in the bank or deal with sending out &quot;REMINDER&quot; notices on a weekly basis.  The level of &quot;foot dragging&quot; is getting to the point of being ridiculous.  How angry would your client be if you took two months to get them their photos?  We&#039;re often times expected to squeeze in properties on short notice and crank out the final photos and tours by the next morning.  And, I&#039;m sure you would agree that it isn&#039;t asking too much to be paid when our work is complete, or at least within 10 days of invoice date (especially when you offer a pay online feature).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you!  I just decided to do the same thing.  I have a credit card authorization form that I have my clients fill out, before their first shoot.  They check a box that allows me to keep their credit card number on file so that can I bill their credit card at the time that I deliver their photos.  It works alot like when a hotel or rental car company takes your credit card number as a deposit when you make a reservation. It costs me a little more, but I&#8217;d rather pay around 1.75% in processing fees instead of having to deal with depositing checks in the bank or deal with sending out &#8220;REMINDER&#8221; notices on a weekly basis.  The level of &#8220;foot dragging&#8221; is getting to the point of being ridiculous.  How angry would your client be if you took two months to get them their photos?  We&#8217;re often times expected to squeeze in properties on short notice and crank out the final photos and tours by the next morning.  And, I&#8217;m sure you would agree that it isn&#8217;t asking too much to be paid when our work is complete, or at least within 10 days of invoice date (especially when you offer a pay online feature).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Reibman</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/27/photomatix-hdr-for-problem-exteriors/comment-page-1/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Reibman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 00:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=101#comment-516</guid>
		<description>Scott,

One of my problems is knowing the market price on these photos. I&#039;ve had two stagers ask to buy my images and one told me what another  popular photographer was asking so I just had to go with that in this case. The donation idea is based on my own giving and saves me the hassle of invoicing.

On  a related subject, I&#039;ve been having some difficulty getting paid recently so I&#039;m changing over to COD for most of my clients. One client was so egregious that I deleted all the photos from the virtual tour I created and told him he was not authorized to use the photos on the mls until I received payment. In this case, the house is still on the market six weeks later so I could do that. I know a lot of businesses have issues with slow and non payments but I&#039;ve never before been in a business where I&#039;m invoicing so much and seeing such a high rate of foot dragging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>One of my problems is knowing the market price on these photos. I&#8217;ve had two stagers ask to buy my images and one told me what another  popular photographer was asking so I just had to go with that in this case. The donation idea is based on my own giving and saves me the hassle of invoicing.</p>
<p>On  a related subject, I&#8217;ve been having some difficulty getting paid recently so I&#8217;m changing over to COD for most of my clients. One client was so egregious that I deleted all the photos from the virtual tour I created and told him he was not authorized to use the photos on the mls until I received payment. In this case, the house is still on the market six weeks later so I could do that. I know a lot of businesses have issues with slow and non payments but I&#8217;ve never before been in a business where I&#8217;m invoicing so much and seeing such a high rate of foot dragging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raye Bellinger</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/27/photomatix-hdr-for-problem-exteriors/comment-page-1/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>Raye Bellinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=101#comment-515</guid>
		<description>Since we are talking legal issues, does anyone have a good &quot;boiler plate&quot; EULA?  Perhaps even a few examples of typical policies.

Thanks,
RLB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since we are talking legal issues, does anyone have a good &#8220;boiler plate&#8221; EULA?  Perhaps even a few examples of typical policies.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
RLB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larrylohrman</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/27/photomatix-hdr-for-problem-exteriors/comment-page-1/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>larrylohrman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 17:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=101#comment-512</guid>
		<description>Scott,
I like that. At least make sure they have your policy in writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,<br />
I like that. At least make sure they have your policy in writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Hargis</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/27/photomatix-hdr-for-problem-exteriors/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hargis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 15:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=101#comment-514</guid>
		<description>@Larry -- I go through a pricing/policy sheet with every new client before the first shoot, then I assume they&#039;re &quot;on board&quot; from that point on. The policy sheet spells out the usage terms, which are also printed on the back of every invoice.

@ Mark Riebman -- Can I suggest a non-profit? It&#039;s called the &quot;Photographers Should Get Paid Foundation&quot; and you&#039;re the main beneficiary.
Stagers are businesses just like you - they should pay their own way without subsidies from us!

Just my 2 cents&#039; worth...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Larry &#8212; I go through a pricing/policy sheet with every new client before the first shoot, then I assume they&#8217;re &#8220;on board&#8221; from that point on. The policy sheet spells out the usage terms, which are also printed on the back of every invoice.</p>
<p>@ Mark Riebman &#8212; Can I suggest a non-profit? It&#8217;s called the &#8220;Photographers Should Get Paid Foundation&#8221; and you&#8217;re the main beneficiary.<br />
Stagers are businesses just like you &#8211; they should pay their own way without subsidies from us!</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents&#8217; worth&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Lacoste</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/27/photomatix-hdr-for-problem-exteriors/comment-page-1/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Lacoste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 06:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=101#comment-513</guid>
		<description>and here is the comic strip for this situation : http://web.mac.com/aaronandpatty/iWeb/What%20the%20Duck/Comic%20Strips/659E05F0-204D-4513-9D03-B03F5F1E9734.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and here is the comic strip for this situation : <a href="http://web.mac.com/aaronandpatty/iWeb/What%20the%20Duck/Comic%20Strips/659E05F0-204D-4513-9D03-B03F5F1E9734.html" rel="nofollow">http://web.mac.com/aaronandpatty/iWeb/What%20the%20Duck/Comic%20Strips/659E05F0-204D-4513-9D03-B03F5F1E9734.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Northen</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/27/photomatix-hdr-for-problem-exteriors/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>James Northen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 23:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=101#comment-522</guid>
		<description>In response to Larry&#039;s comment #7 - she is a Type A personality with a streak of Southern Charm and a no frills vocabulary.

M. James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Larry&#8217;s comment #7 &#8211; she is a Type A personality with a streak of Southern Charm and a no frills vocabulary.</p>
<p>M. James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

