<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 Selling DSLRs As of February 2007</title>
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/05/top-5-dslrs-as-of-february-2007/</link>
	<description>Tips and Techniques for Real Estate Photography</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/05/top-5-dslrs-as-of-february-2007/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/05/top-5-dslrs-as-of-february-2007/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>Oh, it's SELLERS ... sorry guys...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, it&#8217;s SELLERS &#8230; sorry guys&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Hargis</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/05/top-5-dslrs-as-of-february-2007/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hargis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/05/top-5-dslrs-as-of-february-2007/#comment-444</guid>
		<description>So what are the top 5 sellers? PopPhoto's list are the ones I'd have predicted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what are the top 5 sellers? PopPhoto&#8217;s list are the ones I&#8217;d have predicted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/05/top-5-dslrs-as-of-february-2007/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/05/top-5-dslrs-as-of-february-2007/#comment-443</guid>
		<description>Should be renamed as top 5 value dslrs, those presented aren't by far the top 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should be renamed as top 5 value dslrs, those presented aren&#8217;t by far the top 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larrylohrman</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/05/top-5-dslrs-as-of-february-2007/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>larrylohrman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/05/top-5-dslrs-as-of-february-2007/#comment-442</guid>
		<description>Corey,
Yes, I've verified with Sidney Jimenez (www.sidneyjimenez.com) that the Sigma 10-20mm does in fact auto focus on the D40. Sidney says:

"Yes, the combination works and the Sigma is fully automatic. I LOVE THE COMBINATION."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey,<br />
Yes, I&#8217;ve verified with Sidney Jimenez (www.sidneyjimenez.com) that the Sigma 10-20mm does in fact auto focus on the D40. Sidney says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes, the combination works and the Sigma is fully automatic. I LOVE THE COMBINATION.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Shelton</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/05/top-5-dslrs-as-of-february-2007/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Shelton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/05/top-5-dslrs-as-of-february-2007/#comment-441</guid>
		<description>Has anyone confirmed that the Sigma 10-20mm actually DOES auto focus.  I agree that it should, but it'd be nice to hear that someone has the D40 with the Sigma 10-20mm and has actually had it work for them.

BTW, this site is a Godsend, thanks Larry,

Corey Shelton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone confirmed that the Sigma 10-20mm actually DOES auto focus.  I agree that it should, but it&#8217;d be nice to hear that someone has the D40 with the Sigma 10-20mm and has actually had it work for them.</p>
<p>BTW, this site is a Godsend, thanks Larry,</p>
<p>Corey Shelton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Lacoste</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/05/top-5-dslrs-as-of-february-2007/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Lacoste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 09:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/05/top-5-dslrs-as-of-february-2007/#comment-440</guid>
		<description>One of my new co-workers bought this combination following my advice: D40 + Sigma 10-20 + SB-600. It's great. Cheap, wide, excellent results. The review screen is great, color accurate, large and bright.

The D40 light meter is optimized for consumer use, it produces lighter results than other nikons - I use a D50 and a D70 - and this is great for our needs. The matrix metering is really across the full scene, not center-weighted like the D70, which was ending with often +3/4 exposure compensation. I would be afraid of the only 2 stops exposure compensation of the canons.

I'm certainly biased towards Nikon, but given that they have the same features, I think the ergonomics made them a little better than Canon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my new co-workers bought this combination following my advice: D40 + Sigma 10-20 + SB-600. It&#8217;s great. Cheap, wide, excellent results. The review screen is great, color accurate, large and bright.</p>
<p>The D40 light meter is optimized for consumer use, it produces lighter results than other nikons - I use a D50 and a D70 - and this is great for our needs. The matrix metering is really across the full scene, not center-weighted like the D70, which was ending with often +3/4 exposure compensation. I would be afraid of the only 2 stops exposure compensation of the canons.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m certainly biased towards Nikon, but given that they have the same features, I think the ergonomics made them a little better than Canon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
