<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Most Important Photo of A Home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/04/the-most-important-photo-of-a-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/04/the-most-important-photo-of-a-home/</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:11:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Lee</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/04/the-most-important-photo-of-a-home/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 10:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=84#comment-439</guid>
		<description>Thanks for including the shot of a condo. I know we had spoken about what to do for a condo, but seeing it in a picture reaffirms what you were talking about. But, as you mentioned, its more difficult to get a really good picture of a condo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for including the shot of a condo. I know we had spoken about what to do for a condo, but seeing it in a picture reaffirms what you were talking about. But, as you mentioned, its more difficult to get a really good picture of a condo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larrylohrman</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/04/the-most-important-photo-of-a-home/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>larrylohrman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 02:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=84#comment-437</guid>
		<description>Scott,
You raise two excellent points. Use the most attractive angle for the home even if it is the rear. Sometimes the front just doesn&#039;t work so don&#039;t be afraid to use the rear.

On condominiums I recommend a shot of the whole condo building and it&#039;s environment over a tight front door shot because it gives the buyer more information. I&#039;ve added a shot of the last condo we sold as an example. Although I admit frequently it is hard to find a good whole condo building shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,<br />
You raise two excellent points. Use the most attractive angle for the home even if it is the rear. Sometimes the front just doesn&#8217;t work so don&#8217;t be afraid to use the rear.</p>
<p>On condominiums I recommend a shot of the whole condo building and it&#8217;s environment over a tight front door shot because it gives the buyer more information. I&#8217;ve added a shot of the last condo we sold as an example. Although I admit frequently it is hard to find a good whole condo building shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/04/the-most-important-photo-of-a-home/comment-page-1/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 00:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=84#comment-436</guid>
		<description>Sometimes, I find that the REAR exterior is the better facade, and can be substituted in MLS as the exterior.

As for those awful condominiums where the front shot is nothing but garage door, and the unit is physically connected to the units on either side, I often shoot a tighter detail shot of the front door, which hopefully has some plantings or bright flowers to add some pizazz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, I find that the REAR exterior is the better facade, and can be substituted in MLS as the exterior.</p>
<p>As for those awful condominiums where the front shot is nothing but garage door, and the unit is physically connected to the units on either side, I often shoot a tighter detail shot of the front door, which hopefully has some plantings or bright flowers to add some pizazz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Hoelscher</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/04/the-most-important-photo-of-a-home/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Hoelscher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 13:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=84#comment-435</guid>
		<description>One issue I have is these tract homes. It&#039;s hard to get anything more than a front on. I try to angle some, but, of course, then you get the neighbors house. Also, out here in Phoenix, at least, shooting the exterior during the afternoon, the sky is just plain boring.

Love those shots you posted!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One issue I have is these tract homes. It&#8217;s hard to get anything more than a front on. I try to angle some, but, of course, then you get the neighbors house. Also, out here in Phoenix, at least, shooting the exterior during the afternoon, the sky is just plain boring.</p>
<p>Love those shots you posted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/05/04/the-most-important-photo-of-a-home/comment-page-1/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 17:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=84#comment-438</guid>
		<description>thanks for reminding us how impt this one image is. twilight or not is usu. dependent on the buyer. But as you remind us, twilight is the way to go to hide some less photogenic areas of homes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for reminding us how impt this one image is. twilight or not is usu. dependent on the buyer. But as you remind us, twilight is the way to go to hide some less photogenic areas of homes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

