<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightroom for $199 Introductory Price</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/01/30/lightroom-for-199-introductory-price/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/01/30/lightroom-for-199-introductory-price/</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:10:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/01/30/lightroom-for-199-introductory-price/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 02:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=37#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Those are the two features that I am also missing. It&#039;s a same to have to jump to photoshop for just one of two missing features. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Those are the two features that I am also missing. It&#8217;s a same to have to jump to photoshop for just one of two missing features. <img src='http://photographyforrealestate.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larrylohrman</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/01/30/lightroom-for-199-introductory-price/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>larrylohrman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 07:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=37#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Scott,
Version 1.0 of Lightroom will have the ability to clone and use a healing brush... See the recent post on www.lightroom-news.com on removing dust spots. Apparently this was a feature added because so many beta testers requested it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,<br />
Version 1.0 of Lightroom will have the ability to clone and use a healing brush&#8230; See the recent post on <a href="http://www.lightroom-news.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lightroom-news.com</a> on removing dust spots. Apparently this was a feature added because so many beta testers requested it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Hargis</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/01/30/lightroom-for-199-introductory-price/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hargis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 02:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=37#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to put in a plug for Lightroom -- I&#039;ve been using the beta version and it rocks!
However (and this is a big however) it for some reason lacks basic editing tools like a clone stamp, healing brush and perspective controls, making it virtually useless for architectural work. I mean, c&#039;mon Adobe -- everyone has to spot out lens/sensor dust sometime!!

That said, Lightroom is unbeatable for editing large shoots of people or outdoor subjects. And the color and tone balancing controls are just wonderful. In fact, if I&#039;ve taken a truly spectacular Interiors shot and want it for my portfolio, I&#039;ll take it into LR first to color correct, then into CS2 for the regular treatment there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to put in a plug for Lightroom &#8212; I&#8217;ve been using the beta version and it rocks!<br />
However (and this is a big however) it for some reason lacks basic editing tools like a clone stamp, healing brush and perspective controls, making it virtually useless for architectural work. I mean, c&#8217;mon Adobe &#8212; everyone has to spot out lens/sensor dust sometime!!</p>
<p>That said, Lightroom is unbeatable for editing large shoots of people or outdoor subjects. And the color and tone balancing controls are just wonderful. In fact, if I&#8217;ve taken a truly spectacular Interiors shot and want it for my portfolio, I&#8217;ll take it into LR first to color correct, then into CS2 for the regular treatment there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

