Comments on: Real Estate Photography With Sony A100 & Sigma 10-20 Zoom http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/01/14/real-estate-photography-with-sony-a100-sigma-10-20-zoom/ Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful Wed, 23 May 2012 21:57:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Marc Lacoste http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/01/14/real-estate-photography-with-sony-a100-sigma-10-20-zoom/comment-page-1/#comment-140 Marc Lacoste Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:42:16 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=32#comment-140 I'll ned to try PTlens: I love open source programs and dislike DxO badly ported mac application (CPU usage always at max, spinning fan), and disrupting my workflow. I’ll ned to try PTlens: I love open source programs and dislike DxO badly ported mac application (CPU usage always at max, spinning fan), and disrupting my workflow.

]]> By: Mike Price http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/01/14/real-estate-photography-with-sony-a100-sigma-10-20-zoom/comment-page-1/#comment-142 Mike Price Sat, 20 Jan 2007 03:12:26 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=32#comment-142 I was about to post the same recommendation regarding PTLens. The exterior photos really need it. It looks as if something was done to the interior shots to straighten out the barrel distortion. I find PTLens to be more effective than DxO. On another note. Great Blog! It's a great resource for the Real Estate Community. Cheers, MP I was about to post the same recommendation regarding PTLens. The exterior photos really need it. It looks as if something was done to the interior shots to straighten out the barrel distortion. I find PTLens to be more effective than DxO.

On another note. Great Blog! It’s a great resource for the Real Estate Community.

Cheers,
MP

]]> By: Marc Lacoste http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/01/14/real-estate-photography-with-sony-a100-sigma-10-20-zoom/comment-page-1/#comment-139 Marc Lacoste Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:20:16 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=32#comment-139 I have to say I love this lens, too. It's just as wide as needed and sufficently sharp at all apertures for its purpose - I don't need more than 1Mpix. Its main drawback is its barrel distortion, removeable with PTlens or DxO optics when it's too visble, ie when a straight line is present at the edge. When I saw its usefulness, it's realy cheap. Makes me wonder if the canon 5D + sigma 12-24 is worth it, but there is some appeal. There is a flickr group dedicated : http://www.flickr.com/groups/sigma10-20/ Here are some great reviews of various ultra wide : http://www.16-9.net/lens_tests/ I have to say I love this lens, too. It’s just as wide as needed and sufficently sharp at all apertures for its purpose – I don’t need more than 1Mpix. Its main drawback is its barrel distortion, removeable with PTlens or DxO optics when it’s too visble, ie when a straight line is present at the edge.

When I saw its usefulness, it’s realy cheap. Makes me wonder if the canon 5D + sigma 12-24 is worth it, but there is some appeal. There is a flickr group dedicated : http://www.flickr.com/groups/sigma10-20/

Here are some great reviews of various ultra wide : http://www.16-9.net/lens_tests/

]]> By: Aaron Leitz http://photographyforrealestate.net/2007/01/14/real-estate-photography-with-sony-a100-sigma-10-20-zoom/comment-page-1/#comment-141 Aaron Leitz Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:32:06 +0000 http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=32#comment-141 I use the Sigma 10-20mm almost exclusively and it's a great lens! I use the Sigma 10-20mm almost exclusively and it’s a great lens!

]]>