<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: D40 &#8211; Nikon&#8217;s New Low-End DSLR Announced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyforrealestate.net/2006/11/22/d40-nikons-new-low-end-dslr-announced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2006/11/22/d40-nikons-new-low-end-dslr-announced/</link>
	<description>Helping Real Estate Photographers Be Successful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:55:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2006/11/22/d40-nikons-new-low-end-dslr-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-31800</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=13#comment-31800</guid>
		<description>This is one excellent camera, even with the relatively low megapixels resolution the overall quality of features for this price makes one of the bests (if not the best) machines of the category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one excellent camera, even with the relatively low megapixels resolution the overall quality of features for this price makes one of the bests (if not the best) machines of the category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Lacoste</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2006/11/22/d40-nikons-new-low-end-dslr-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Lacoste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyforrealestate.info/?p=13#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Note that at this time, the D40 is at the same price than the D50 which has a much lower actual price than its introduction MSRP one yaer and a half ago.

You gain those features:
# larger, higher definition review screen
# higher ISO 3200 sensitivity
# more compactness and lightness

but lost those:
* only internal focus motor AF-S and AF-I lenses autofocus
* three AF sensors, down from five
* top LCD status display removed, information provided by the back screen
* direct access to resolution, white balance and sensitivity settings removed

A good thing is that Nikon keep the 1/500s (unlimited in fact, electronic) flash sync.

For the SB-400, I&#039;m not sure it could be useful for interior photo because its coverage is only 28 mm equivalent. It should not be noticeable with a 24 mm eq., but not under, unless with a wide-angle converter like a sto-fen omni-bounce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that at this time, the D40 is at the same price than the D50 which has a much lower actual price than its introduction MSRP one yaer and a half ago.</p>
<p>You gain those features:<br />
# larger, higher definition review screen<br />
# higher ISO 3200 sensitivity<br />
# more compactness and lightness</p>
<p>but lost those:<br />
* only internal focus motor AF-S and AF-I lenses autofocus<br />
* three AF sensors, down from five<br />
* top LCD status display removed, information provided by the back screen<br />
* direct access to resolution, white balance and sensitivity settings removed</p>
<p>A good thing is that Nikon keep the 1/500s (unlimited in fact, electronic) flash sync.</p>
<p>For the SB-400, I&#8217;m not sure it could be useful for interior photo because its coverage is only 28 mm equivalent. It should not be noticeable with a 24 mm eq., but not under, unless with a wide-angle converter like a sto-fen omni-bounce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

