<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: D40 - Nikon&#8217;s New Low-End DSLR Announced</title>
	<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2006/11/22/d40-nikons-new-low-end-dslr-announced/</link>
	<description>Tips and Techniques for Real Estate Photography</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc Lacoste</title>
		<link>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2006/11/22/d40-nikons-new-low-end-dslr-announced/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Lacoste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographyforrealestate.net/2006/11/22/d40-nikons-new-low-end-dslr-announced/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Note that at this time, the D40 is at the same price than the D50 which has a much lower actual price than its introduction MSRP one yaer and a half ago.

You gain those features:
# larger, higher definition review screen
# higher ISO 3200 sensitivity
# more compactness and lightness

but lost those:
* only internal focus motor AF-S and AF-I lenses autofocus
* three AF sensors, down from five
* top LCD status display removed, information provided by the back screen
* direct access to resolution, white balance and sensitivity settings removed

A good thing is that Nikon keep the 1/500s (unlimited in fact, electronic) flash sync.

For the SB-400, I'm not sure it could be useful for interior photo because its coverage is only 28 mm equivalent. It should not be noticeable with a 24 mm eq., but not under, unless with a wide-angle converter like a sto-fen omni-bounce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that at this time, the D40 is at the same price than the D50 which has a much lower actual price than its introduction MSRP one yaer and a half ago.</p>
<p>You gain those features:<br />
# larger, higher definition review screen<br />
# higher ISO 3200 sensitivity<br />
# more compactness and lightness</p>
<p>but lost those:<br />
* only internal focus motor AF-S and AF-I lenses autofocus<br />
* three AF sensors, down from five<br />
* top LCD status display removed, information provided by the back screen<br />
* direct access to resolution, white balance and sensitivity settings removed</p>
<p>A good thing is that Nikon keep the 1/500s (unlimited in fact, electronic) flash sync.</p>
<p>For the SB-400, I&#8217;m not sure it could be useful for interior photo because its coverage is only 28 mm equivalent. It should not be noticeable with a 24 mm eq., but not under, unless with a wide-angle converter like a sto-fen omni-bounce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
